3 - Stuart Wenn #22
2 - Chris Donlon #1
1 - Jason Armstrong #26

Woops, sorry those are the West Coast votes.

Saints Votes as follows.

5 - Montagna
4 - Roberton
3 - Milne
2 - Armitage
1 - Steven

There needs to be a Royal Commission into yesterday's game........I'm sure the men in green had something riding on that game. If they had something riding on the game they would have bet on the Saints at $4, the only gambling explaination could be if the bookies paid them off so as to not have to ...

But there is consistency, the Umpires constistently f*** us.

BigMart wrote:How do you know we are squeaky clean??

If we had cheated we would have got caught.

You know part of me would find it fitting if Collingwood ultimately got done for cheating because they dumped Essendon into the s*** to deflect from the Illicit drug issue.

The rest of me would be f****** pissed because we would have been cheated out a Premiership.

Collingwood have a sophisticated media machine which is expert at shifting focus off any suspicious Collingwood behaviour- notice how much of their dirty laundry quickly disappears from view. Usually if there's any heat on Collingwood we quickly see a sensational story in the media about some other...

FFS looks like it Matthew "What's a personality?" Lloyd replacing GT and Damian "neo-hutchy" Barrett in for the Turd

Can be no complaints about Seaford's location now that the freeway is built. thats because you live there mate. the place is a hole, not just Linnen House but the whole 10km radius of it. the freeway was built to avoid Frankston, the traffic, and the dangers of driving through it . For most people ...

mr six o'clock wrote:
I think the saints only use the one ground , which has different coloured boundary lines marked !
one with the mcg ground dimensions and one with the docklands !

Stupid cost cutting, should have 2 ovals of almost identical dimensions like Essendon are planning!

Life memberships are put to a vote at the AGM but not awarded till the B&F. See bottom of first post from the last AGM ... http://www.saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=74529&hilit=AGM I've been to most AGMs since the early 90s. But I'm not travelling down to Frankenstoned for it. Ma...

A fitting punishment would be forfeiture of 1st round picks in this years draft and their picks being downgraded to the last in each subsequent round, as well as the pre-season and rookie drafts and those in club management most responsible being banned from the AFL for 5 years.

Rumours are the Hooker thing might be along the lines of Hooker & Cripps to West Coast, Brown to St Kilda and Pick 26 to Essendon & Essendon using pick 26 to get Jacobs from Port.

Drive to Seaford shouldn't be an issue Peninsula Link will be open early next year so traffic should clear up a little bit.

StGoddard18 wrote:So because I am a social club member with a reserved seat one level 1 I am only a priority 2? But if I had a reserved seat on level 2 I would be priority 1?

I'm level 1 reserved seat holder and have category 1

I dont think we do have enough pace. If we get Koby, we should try and recruit some speedsters in the draft. Geelong and Sydney over the last two years where hardly what youd call quick sides. A ball will always move through the air faster than someone can run. Skills. Skills. Skills. I think you'l...

They normally look to St Kilda when they need a Full Forward Lockett Hall Walsh 2 out of 3 aint bad..... :lol: Soooooo, would Kosi like to move to Sin City? Maybe the warmer climate might help prolong his career? What would they give us for him? Have they got any more Sean Dempsters...? :wink: They...

saintspremiers wrote:Dropping Wilkes and Saad is a first positive step

Saad and Milne were mostly just unlucky, Some of Wiles, Kosi and Reiwoldts kicks were just diabolical.

matrix wrote:got 4 weeks

WTF???

matrix wrote:Nick Bowen:
Chairman: Judd entitle to have his guilty plea taken into account, a matter for jury what weight they give that. "In my judgment his contrition was sincere ..."

well chairman on his side by the looks

Chairman clearly delusional

matrix wrote:jury deliberations about to start

wondering how long this will take??

1 sec to find him guilty, any mans guess how long to throw the book at him for the s*** that came out of Judd & his QC's mouths.

prwilkinson wrote:6 reduced to 4.

Can't be reduced sent directly to the Tribunal

CURLY wrote:StCarl that would have to be the biggest lot of overhyped bulls*** I've seen. If what you posted was true which it isn't Judd will be scissor kicking blokes heads off in his next game.

Because Judd only attacks those that cant defend themselves at the time.

Do you enjoy having your own opinion or just agree with others who say the AFL, the commentators, the media and son on hate us. God I wish I agreed with those people. I am not arguing here. Having a sensible discussion. maybe you get your own way at home so much you cant discuss this without callin...

another thing i disagree on if the player is hurt in the incident the offender gets more weeks how about looking at the incident and saying well f*** me he 'couldve' dislocated the blokes shoulder and caused injury so therefore 4 weeks kind of puts it out there that shite like this is not on but no...

North always seem to give the most damning medical reports so Judd was pretty much screwed to start with. Knowing the AFL they will probably pull a Heath Shaw and work out the exact number of weeks for him to be available for finals (if Carlton make it). Although he should be in for a long holiday, ...