They should have started at 6 weeks and worked back from that. Another freaking tribunal disgrace.

Good to see the kid come back on though, you blokes must be pretty happy with all that he's done in his first year !

Good luck with that budgie, more likely dementiou will send the afl swat team around to pick off your mate, steal his computer and torch his house.

He will then comment that no one has ever disagreed with a tribunal decision.

Adrian was unable to respond, as he was ironing Andrews boxer shorts.

Hey Tigers,
Wanna better draft pick ?

Kiwi comedian Cal Wilson has a very funny routine on how she became a Saints supporter, including an interesting description of the Fraser.

Very funny girl, and looks pretty good in those banana coloured hotpants on the wedge !

Imagine, barracking for the filth, and they lose !

oooooh the pain!!!

I might, however, lend some vocal support to the blue scum

Saint Corin wrote:I dont understand how Whelan broke/hurt his jaw in that incident, doesn't look like his face connected though. Whats done is done I guess

Well there's no footage of Baker hitting him so I guess that means he's guilty !

Looks to me like whelan tried to kill him.

Saint Corin wrote: if they go for the body and heads clip its unlucky.

It's also reportable. But given the susspension given to Baker, we can think ourselves lucky that Luke wasn't susspended.

Riewoldting wrote:

satchmo wrote:They already have had it both ways.

And the St Kilda Football Club lubes up, bends over and takes it both ways.

I don't think they lube up actually !

Otiman wrote:So you disagree with the baker suspension, or the others? You can't have it both ways.

They already have had it both ways.

Otiman wrote:

Dan Warna wrote:plenty of 'illegal acts' that warrant free kicks NOT suspensions.

How many result in pretty extreme facial injuries though?

Hmmm,...Kosi, fractured skull...no report....Ball,.....brain damage ...no report.......I guess they're not facial injuries ?

According to andrew "zapp" demetriou, adrian "kiff" anderson is looking after that problem.

I would not be so quick to condemn other clubs and players for taking recreational drugs ....if you think any Saints players have never taken the odd "party" drug then you have your head in the sand .... Well BS, if 7 of our players are ever reported to have tested positive I'll bet you'l...

plugger66 wrote:Why would they want the 4th biggest club in Melbourne out.

The 4th biggest club in the 3rd best state ???

Woohoo I'm all excited again !

I'm still pissed off about this, stinger. Help me out with your legal brain ! How is it that the evidence that got him reported was declared incorrect, yet he was suspended ?

If that was the only evidence they had to make a report, and it's wrong, how can they possibly suspend him?

Mr Magic wrote:Some Trivia Q & A

Part 1

*edited by mod

Can we please stay on topic ?

I'm sure the club concerned is going through a testing time, but no doubt it will all be positive in the end.

evertonfc wrote:You know, for everyone who bags them, they've produced three kids who've played AFL football. Not bad.

I've produced three kids that barrack for the Saints. So I win.

I'm not sure why the kid wouldn't be champing at the bit to play for a coach like Ross.

However, I've noticed that the more successful clubs seem to have more patience with developing players, perhaps we give up on them too easily ?

Why would her husband be unhappy ? Surely he's a Saints supporter ?

Grimfang wrote:If it's the first option, you can guarantee the AFL will dedicate a camera to Baker's every move on the field; looking for absolutely anything to nail him on.

That's going to happen anyway; Bakes will be under more scrutiny than pickett was for the rest of his carreer.

Eastern wrote:
Should we send an email to Mr. Demitriou and remind him that the man he is so bitter at was sacked by St Kilda in September 2006? !!

It's the potential son-in-law that he's after now...

What if Bakes goes back top the tribunal and claims he lied in his evidence, there was no contact....cops a 7.5grand fine for lying and the case has to be thrown out for insufficient evidence ?

How about the banner has a big pic of Steven Baker, and underneath it says ..."Rub that out you ****s !"

cowboy18 wrote:Crucifiction?

No, they said he could go free and live on an island somewhere....