On the Fence (ala "sore balls"). None of your highlighted text is relevant to Baker's case. There is NO EVIDENCE to indicate that Baker, in applying his block, could and should have reasonably foreseen that his head would have made contact with Farmer's head and cause the damage that it u...

saintspremiers wrote:perhaps he's admitted to Woosha that's he's on the gear like his teamate and this is an easy exit for the season.....

nothing would surprise me with that mob.

Or avoiding a test ?

Drugs are bad..
mm'okay ?

Oh When the Saints wrote:Philip Priest QC is an outstanding barrister.

If he couldn't get Baker off, then there are few other barristers in Victoria who could have done a better job IMO.

If there are few better, then how about getting one of the few ?

Move on to the frementle site and torch it.

Harvey is bagging the tribunal ?

He might want to talk about it for a bit longer, might take the freebasing supporters little minds off the fact that their cess pit of a club didn't make the finals.

Go Dees !

Ill bet that the turd plays this week too.

JeffDunne wrote:On what grounds would we appeal?

On the grounds that the finding was incorrect based on the evidence.

Love the way his team mates rally around him ! Looks like they have as much respect for him as we do.

mcadam05 wrote:this is some of the gold from dockerland

Tell them they can have september off this year to look for a coach that doesn't want to go to essendon.

maysiemoo wrote:why dont they release it then?
itll stop the angry letters tomorrow?

Who said that ?

Krikkett wrote:

maysiemoo wrote:7 weeks for something with NO actual VISUAL EVIDENCE

oh.. my.. god....

there are no words to describe... feeling.. now... oh.. my.. gosh...

Really? Who said that?

It was maysiemoo.

If you disagree with the verdict, ring the afl tomorrow and discuss in with adrian anderson. I'm sure he'll be all ears.

The karma bus is gonna run down every last one of you suckholes !

it's true

this'll test the net-nanny !

n1ck wrote:If Chewbacca is a wookie, you MUST ACQUIT!

The wookie defence ! Of course, it cannot fail !

Solar wrote:hayes getting thrown into the fence up at the gabba, dal elbowed in the head by lloyd, maguire getting hit in the guts by hall.....

The lloyd one was nasty, and the bastard got off claiming he was try to play like Robert Harvey !!!

Lenny was in the best form of his career until fenced.

If he's got a lump on the back of his head he walks ? Give Milney a crow bar !

plugger66 wrote: Any club could come up with poor tribunal decisions.

And that's why I have no faith in the process.

I do not for one minute subscribe to the theory we get a raw deal at the tribunal or anywhere else in the AFL. That is just emotional rubbish. Once again I admire you faith in the process, but I don't share it. Two of our players have received severe head injuries (fractured skull, and swelling on ...

plugger66 wrote:That is why it is going to the tribunal. We will see the evidence and if he didnt do anything he will get off.

Fair enough, nice to see that you have faith in the process.

Do you think that he will get off if the evidence consists of 1 freo official saying he saw Baker hit Farmer ?

plugger66 wrote: Have you seen the evidence because if you had can you please tell me.

That's the problem right there plugger, show us the evidence
If it stands up let him hang.

I'm a waitin...

plugger66 wrote:Yes as usual the AFL are picking on us. They hate the Saints. We get the worst decisions. What rubbish. No wonder we are so negitive.

There's more evidence to support that than there is to support a charge against Baker.

Mr Magic wrote:So what is alleged?

dementiou hasn't decided yet.