This is huge if accurate. Hope you're right Jax! How sure are you -- can you put a % on it?

I thought because dal activated that contract clause he could only be traded to get to north?

GUN.

Feeling much more hopeful of his prospects than I was 3 weeks ago!

bigred wrote:I reckon he is cooked between the ears.

Hope not cooked, but seems very fragile It's a shame.

Is a ruck/fwd if anything I think.

Good to see Simpkin.

southernsaint wrote:I am hoping we even have jimmy websters brother after this years draft to add to our future midfield.

What about Wright's brother?

We'd be flying then....

Dal led the team in clearances and was behind only Steven in contested ball. It wasn't his best game by a long shot, but he wasn't any more tagged out of it than the rest of the St Kilda midfield. What was their excuse again? Give that we were -17 at the clearances and -25 in contested ball I'm at ...

Thing is, we drop dal and they will tag jack. Yes they will and then it will be up to Jack to work through the tag just like any decent midfielder has to in just about every game of their life. It shouldn't be a reason to preclude applying the pressure to Dal. Exactly. Then hopefully when the next ...

As i mentioned earlier haw can you tell he isnt trying? I don't think he's 'not trying'. As I said I reckon he's playing in preservation mode. We all know what he is capable of, and he's not producing that. You don't lose your ability so drastically over a matter of months. Is he injured? If so, re...

Said on The Footy Show his contract stipulates he has another year subject to good health. He is playing in preservation mode IMO. Players like him should be setting the standard for our young brigade. Send him back to the twos, and send the message that anyone not prepared to give their all will no...

I think Stanley is getting games ahead of Simpkin because the coaches know Tom won't be growing any taller. Stanley however could improve his defensive work. Possibly. At some point. They hope. Personally I'd rather see Simpkin out there. Stanley has all the physical attributes, but perhaps not the ...

Now 8...

[quote="gringo"]Read it too. Long wait to see him again if true. Mine took about 4 years to get mostly right again. He will get some good medical treatment but they don't fix easily. Even tendonitis can take a long time.[/] Or there's Roughead who came back last year better than ever. Is t...

Good post, don't see what's so hard to understand?

Great game from Roo with backs against the wall.

Knows we won't win a flag this year but busted a gut for the jumper.

Not sure I'd stick around if we were to relocate to NZ.

Was at that game. He kicked a goal from memory -- marked an opp defender's clanger.

Yes mate, as a member I provided it.

Ralphy wrote:they should be calling people that have been a member for years thats loyality

I'd suggest they are. I have been.

They're not calling people out of the phone book and hoping they're Saints supporters.

Signed up yesterday but still got a call from Nathan Wright.

Heppell is out of contract at the end of the season. After landing BJ, it's being suggested the Bombers might struggle to keep him on their list, particularly if he continues his current form and increases his worth. The kid is a gun. Right age. Why not go hard? http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news...

Quixote wrote:

Junction Oval wrote:Supporters are simply beginning to accept reality - we are now "officially" in a Re-building phase.

Focus now more on effort, not on outcomes.

Hey mate. What's that though? Accept losing?

What's the alternative?

Let's hope the FB is Frawley I have heard Frawley mentioned a bit as a possible transfer prospect over to St.Kilda, just wondering how you rate him? How does he compare to his peers/ those of a similar age. I must ask my Tigers mate how he rates him too. G O S A I N T S Just realised my tigers mate...

Yep Winmar's looking solid! Always thought his biggest weakness was his ... weakness.

Taken by the Hawks.

http://www.afl.com.au/news/newsarticle/ ... fault.aspx

Obviously no good.