Team v dogs

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7905
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1695 times
Been thanked: 788 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673103Post WellardSaint »

maverick wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:Acres to push forward I think.

Plus Carlisle I have a feeling will be told to sneak forward when he can on occassion.
I reckon Carlisle might play a fair bit forward this week, dogs have named a very small forward line
I think there were suggestions that Jake didn't like playing Fwd for Bombers, or was that just the Ruck?
He seemed really stoked to get that goal in Tassy...
very nice steal. Not sure if he wants to be a target up fwd


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
SemperFidelis
SS Life Member
Posts: 3856
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 2:41pm
Has thanked: 419 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673104Post SemperFidelis »

To the top wrote:
Again we are set up to have just too many passengers against a side that dies not have passengers

Then there is Longer!!

What will their rucks do to him around the ground?
They're playing a first game ruckman, English. Let's just hope Billy gives him a worthy initiation


Always loyal
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30055
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 703 times
Been thanked: 1218 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673105Post saintsRrising »

WellardSaint wrote:
maverick wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:Acres to push forward I think.

Plus Carlisle I have a feeling will be told to sneak forward when he can on occassion.
I reckon Carlisle might play a fair bit forward this week, dogs have named a very small forward line
I think there were suggestions that Jake didn't like playing Fwd for Bombers, or was that just the Ruck?
He seemed really stoked to get that goal in Tassy...
very nice steal. Not sure if he wants to be a target up fwd
I am sure he will not mind to do it for cameo performances or occasional games.

If he pushes forward on occasion it will take some of the heat off Paddy.

It is also very important that Membrey has a good game as I am sure that he will be the forward that will take the most marks.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
lintonstreet
Club Player
Posts: 320
Joined: Thu 09 Jun 2016 8:40pm
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673108Post lintonstreet »

skeptic wrote:
lintonstreet wrote:
skeptic wrote:So Weller survives again eh
He's the best pressure forward we have so highly unlikely he will be dropped anytime soon.
I'd say on performance this season, he's behind Wright, Minch and heck even Gresh who may not be as good a pressure player but is more effective nonetheless.

Would rather Dunstan in the team on form at the moment
Thank goodness the coaching staff and I have a different view of Mav's contribution than you.


realdeal
Club Player
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673110Post realdeal »

Not entirely impressed with our selections the past two weeks..

We've gone from having a severely undersized defense to having a undersized fwd line..
A 188cm Membrey as a key fwd,
an inexperienced and under confident McCartin.
Membrey should be our third 'tall' fwd but now we also take Roo out of the equation.
Add to this Longer's complete inability to play anywhere but in ruck contests..

You'd imagine that Weller plays another MIA game he'll be back at Sandy.

Kind of game I can imagine Gresham having a big one..

However..In saying all of this, with the Dogs lack of tall fwds themselves, is there a chance that the versatile Carlisle has to play in different positions this week?? :idea:


User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5977
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 354 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673111Post MC Gusto »

No roo no Bruce this becomes a critical test for paddy


#1 Ryder fan
realdeal
Club Player
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673112Post realdeal »

WellardSaint wrote:
maverick wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:Acres to push forward I think.

Plus Carlisle I have a feeling will be told to sneak forward when he can on occassion.
I reckon Carlisle might play a fair bit forward this week, dogs have named a very small forward line
I think there were suggestions that Jake didn't like playing Fwd for Bombers, or was that just the Ruck?
He seemed really stoked to get that goal in Tassy...
very nice steal. Not sure if he wants to be a target up fwd
You beat me to it Mav.. re: Carlisle.

I believe the problem Carlisle had was that he was made to play as a permanent forward, not that he refused to play anywhere but defense.


User avatar
Wrote for Luck
Club Player
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673114Post Wrote for Luck »

is Richo forcing our midfield, by way of on field development, to not bomb it long, work it in, and find a target on the chest?
run the risk of Wood having a field day. just hope Acres, Steele, and Stevens can take some, as all are tallish and strong above the head.
glad for Savage he deserves his spot.


Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7905
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1695 times
Been thanked: 788 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673115Post WellardSaint »

millarsaint wrote:is Richo forcing our midfield, by way of on field development, to not bomb it long, work it in, and find a target on the chest?
run the risk of Wood having a field day. just hope Acres, Steele, and Stevens can take some, as all are tallish and strong above the head.
glad for Savage he deserves his spot.
Carlscum is nowhere near as good as Doggies,
but their Docherty took about 300 intercept marks or appeared to grab everything, even with Bwoose, Roo and Skunk in the pack.

Easton Wood will just be thinking "How good's this?" at halftime when he's clunked a dozen or so.


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673121Post dragit »

lintonstreet wrote:
skeptic wrote:
lintonstreet wrote:
skeptic wrote:So Weller survives again eh
He's the best pressure forward we have so highly unlikely he will be dropped anytime soon.
I'd say on performance this season, he's behind Wright, Minch and heck even Gresh who may not be as good a pressure player but is more effective nonetheless.

Would rather Dunstan in the team on form at the moment
Thank goodness the coaching staff and I have a different view of Mav's contribution than you.
Were you were the guy that suggested that Mav was just about to become elite?


User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7905
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1695 times
Been thanked: 788 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673123Post WellardSaint »

dragit wrote:
lintonstreet wrote:
skeptic wrote:
lintonstreet wrote:
skeptic wrote:So Weller survives again eh
He's the best pressure forward we have so highly unlikely he will be dropped anytime soon.
I'd say on performance this season, he's behind Wright, Minch and heck even Gresh who may not be as good a pressure player but is more effective nonetheless.

Would rather Dunstan in the team on form at the moment
Thank goodness the coaching staff and I have a different view of Mav's contribution than you.
Were you were the guy that suggested that Mav was just about to become elite?
yep, he said Mav was on the cusp of "elite" and here is the post
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=91866&p=1648977&hilit=Mav#p1648977


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16490
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3432 times
Been thanked: 2686 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673124Post skeptic »

WellardSaint wrote:
dragit wrote:
lintonstreet wrote:
skeptic wrote:
lintonstreet wrote:
skeptic wrote:So Weller survives again eh
He's the best pressure forward we have so highly unlikely he will be dropped anytime soon.
I'd say on performance this season, he's behind Wright, Minch and heck even Gresh who may not be as good a pressure player but is more effective nonetheless.

Would rather Dunstan in the team on form at the moment
Thank goodness the coaching staff and I have a different view of Mav's contribution than you.
Were you were the guy that suggested that Mav was just about to become elite?
yep, he said Mav was on the cusp of "elite" and here is the post
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=91866&p=1648977&hilit=Mav#p1648977

I really want to reiterate here... I actually thought he was in the cusp of getting into that group at the start of the season too. I thought he was SUPERB last season and I rate him.

But he just hasn't produced this season.

I don't want him cut from the list... just to go back, find some form and come back and play the type of footy we know he's capable of.

No special treatment


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30055
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 703 times
Been thanked: 1218 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673130Post saintsRrising »

skeptic wrote:

I really want to reiterate here... I actually thought he was in the cusp of getting into that group at the start of the season too. I thought he was SUPERB last season and I rate him.

But he just hasn't produced this season.

I don't want him cut from the list... just to go back, find some form and come back and play the type of footy we know he's capable of.

No special treatment
Well you want him dropped. But who would you bring in?

Wright not playing this week.
Long not ready.
Lonie certainly has been worse that Weller this year.

rice is probably the most deserving player outside the 22 picked who could play, but he has not played forward at all and so is not an option to replace Weller.

Despite Weller not being as polished as in recent years he has still won plenty of the ball.

It would seem to me that to play someone else in place of Weller would be special treatment for that player.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10631
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 792 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673136Post ace »

carn_sainter wrote:Meatball in for Dunstan is a good move.

I have serious worries that we won't be able to move the ball from the back half because we won't have anything to kick to.

I'm interested in seeing how we set up. Weller and Membrey leading off half forward, McCartin deeper?

For a team that relies heavily on banging it in deep and long, we don't have much aerial power. Here's hoping we can beat their press and hit some targets.
It is a ridiculous setup.
Paddy showed last week that if he plays don't expect much, certainly don't count on him to dominate with high marking or even bringing the ball to ground.
Membrey is valuable when he has one opponent but make him compete against two opponents and his output could plummet.
Without Riewoldt we need another tall up forward.
I only hope that we listed Bruce as an emergency because we actually intend for him to play.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10631
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 792 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673137Post ace »

WellardSaint wrote:
millarsaint wrote:is Richo forcing our midfield, by way of on field development, to not bomb it long, work it in, and find a target on the chest?
run the risk of Wood having a field day. just hope Acres, Steele, and Stevens can take some, as all are tallish and strong above the head.
glad for Savage he deserves his spot.
Carlscum is nowhere near as good as Doggies,
but their Docherty took about 300 intercept marks or appeared to grab everything, even with Bwoose, Roo and Skunk in the pack.

Easton Wood will just be thinking "How good's this?" at halftime when he's clunked a dozen or so.
Easton Wood likely to be best on ground given our selected forward setup.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673141Post fugazi »

This team just makes no sense.
Slow FF and no CHF
The plan must be kick it to a double teamed McCartin, hope that he brings it to ground and have the mosquito fleet to crumb goals.

The reality is, they will just intercept mark and run off Paddy and create havoc off their half back line.


Nee!
User avatar
Linton Lodger
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2467
Joined: Mon 18 Aug 2014 2:07pm
Has thanked: 86 times
Been thanked: 256 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673143Post Linton Lodger »

maverick wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:Acres to push forward I think.

Plus Carlisle I have a feeling will be told to sneak forward when he can on occassion.
I reckon Carlisle might play a fair bit forward this week, dogs have named a very small forward line
Yeah, we're going in with a smallish forward line. Would not surprise if Jake goes forward.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16490
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3432 times
Been thanked: 2686 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673145Post skeptic »

saintsRrising wrote:
skeptic wrote:

I really want to reiterate here... I actually thought he was in the cusp of getting into that group at the start of the season too. I thought he was SUPERB last season and I rate him.

But he just hasn't produced this season.

I don't want him cut from the list... just to go back, find some form and come back and play the type of footy we know he's capable of.

No special treatment
Well you want him dropped. But who would you bring in?

Wright not playing this week.
Long not ready.
Lonie certainly has been worse that Weller this year.

rice is probably the most deserving player outside the 22 picked who could play, but he has not played forward at all and so is not an option to replace Weller.

Despite Weller not being as polished as in recent years he has still won plenty of the ball.

It would seem to me that to play someone else in place of Weller would be special treatment for that player.
Respectfully SRS, we've already acknowledged that we're not on the same page on this and I respect that.
Like I said before... would rather see Dunstan stay in the team or see a guy like Sav get a chance up forward or perhaps he or Rice could play back and u could try DMac forward or something.

I guess the point of difference here is how poorly one thinks he's playing... clearly I think he has been poorer than most on here. My feeling is my expectations on him are higher than most too rightly or wrongly


User avatar
carn_sainter
Club Player
Posts: 1470
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:49pm
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673161Post carn_sainter »

skeptic wrote:Respectfully SRS, we've already acknowledged that we're not on the same page on this and I respect that.
Like I said before... would rather see Dunstan stay in the team or see a guy like Sav get a chance up forward or perhaps he or Rice could play back and u could try DMac forward or something.

I guess the point of difference here is how poorly one thinks he's playing... clearly I think he has been poorer than most on here. My feeling is my expectations on him are higher than most too rightly or wrongly
I'm with you a little on this, skeptic. I'm ambivalent about his being played or dropped. I don't think we have a good like-for-like replacement, but Weller has underperformed this year. For me, in every game, he has been either ineffective (missing shots, missing targets, fumbling, sticking tackles) or a passenger who hasn't created anything. Neither play, nor space for others, nor defensive pressure.

He was - last year - an excellent half forward. A lead-up target, a decent crumber, great pressure and a damaging boot. He has none of that going on this season so far.

As lead-up half forwards that can command the footy, we don't have any waiting in the 2s, so I think Weller can stay in the side. But he has to find some form. And I would prefer a guy like Minchington - who can play forward (not as a lead-up target so much) and midfield over Weller if one of them had to be dropped.


User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673163Post bigred »

Reckon we may see Paddy as the hit up around half forward.

He actually does it pretty well when he can run at the ball.

Don't really like the selections. I dunno, this just does not look like a winning formula.

Paddy is hardly in form of any type and the rest of the fwd line are kicking at under 50%.

On face value we could struggle to kick ten goals.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
mullet
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5109
Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673168Post mullet »

I hope Koby has spilled his guts on their game plan


Superboot
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2496
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 9:11pm
Location: Behind the goal, South Road end
Has thanked: 32 times
Been thanked: 35 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673182Post Superboot »

I reckon Mav's playing injured. Not moving freely and is trying to hide a limp.


Vazelos
Club Player
Posts: 1261
Joined: Sun 12 Sep 2010 1:17am
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 317 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673194Post Vazelos »

Carlisle may act as a swing man in this game and may spend time in the forward line.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18394
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1731 times
Been thanked: 801 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673203Post bigcarl »

Rooey needed a rest so no problem with that.

The non-inclusion of Bruce is puzzling though. To me the forward line lacks leadership and a hard, experienced edge.

I don't expect that from Paddy yet. He's still struggling to find his feet. Nor Membrey. That's not his go.

I sincerely hope to be proven wrong, but it's as though we've conceded this match already. And if you look at the ladder only miniscule percentage separates the Bulldogs and us. They aren't that flash.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16490
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3432 times
Been thanked: 2686 times

Re: Team v dogs

Post: # 1673213Post skeptic »

carn_sainter wrote:
skeptic wrote:Respectfully SRS, we've already acknowledged that we're not on the same page on this and I respect that.
Like I said before... would rather see Dunstan stay in the team or see a guy like Sav get a chance up forward or perhaps he or Rice could play back and u could try DMac forward or something.

I guess the point of difference here is how poorly one thinks he's playing... clearly I think he has been poorer than most on here. My feeling is my expectations on him are higher than most too rightly or wrongly
I'm with you a little on this, skeptic. I'm ambivalent about his being played or dropped. I don't think we have a good like-for-like replacement, but Weller has underperformed this year. For me, in every game, he has been either ineffective (missing shots, missing targets, fumbling, sticking tackles) or a passenger who hasn't created anything. Neither play, nor space for others, nor defensive pressure.

He was - last year - an excellent half forward. A lead-up target, a decent crumber, great pressure and a damaging boot. He has none of that going on this season so far.

As lead-up half forwards that can command the footy, we don't have any waiting in the 2s, so I think Weller can stay in the side. But he has to find some form. And I would prefer a guy like Minchington - who can play forward (not as a lead-up target so much) and midfield over Weller if one of them had to be dropped.
I think this is very well put Carn Sainter...
It's a fair criticism to say I'm not considering the who will replace aspect closely enough.

It's a personal but I guess... hate seeing someone underperform this much and still play when a guy like Acres has been in and out for a few years for less.

Perhaps Acres could be that guy who plays HFF and we bring in another mid?

The thing is, if you bring in 2016 Mav into this team... it's pbly the difference btw where we are and top 4 for us at this point.


Post Reply