Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

The place to discuss issues with administrators and moderators. Suggestions welcome. All bans will be posted here and the banning appeals process will be held in this forum.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485464Post Bunk_Moreland »

dragit wrote:BM will always be biGmarT to me… sorry bunk.

I was thinking of being re-baptised too, what do you think of spunk_whoreland or monk_fourskin?
Up to you dragit.

It is not BM's business. But if you do and you want to be known as those nics, I will not be so rude and disprespectful to not do as you wish.

It is known as basic manners.


You are garbage - Enough said
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485469Post plugger66 »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Again an impressive break down of quotes and again I find it hilarious. thanks for making me laugh. Just one thing though. People can find something stupid and not mean the mods are stupid. Way over the top that comment. And i have respected your wishes but i can still think they are stupid. And until told otherwise i will continue to point out examples as to why i think its stupid if an example comes up that I think proves its stupid. Doesnt mean I will bother to get warning for calling you the other nic. As ive pointed out before I would rather get a warning dfor what I class as a real breaking of the rules.

Interesting P66.

I enjoy your thinking. Just a little perplexed that you used stupid a number of times (inference???), and begrudgingly accepted the mods decision.

BM finds it facinating that you would address some of the previous post, but completely disregard the parts about basic manners, and courtesy. BM supposes it is a bit more rock and roll to label someones wishes "stupid" than to accord them basic courtesy and basic manners.

Oh well, only you can change your negative and quite rude demeaner. Its all up to you P66.

Im not negative disagreeing with the ruling. I reckon common sense should suggest it was a poor ruling. matter of fact had the ruling not be made I reckon this thread stops a while back. And I think you can say something is stupid without being rude but i may go with dumb now. or petty. You understand petty BM? And even the real person typing this sometimes struggles with manners so i reckon that would also include p66 because no matter how hard the real person trys to be different to p66 he ends up the same. And if I canged my nic eventually the old p66 will come out. Get my drift BM?


User avatar
GrumpyOne
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8163
Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2010 9:25am
Location: Kicked out of the Coffee Shop, Settlement Pub, Cranbourne

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485501Post GrumpyOne »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
dragit wrote:BM will always be biGmarT to me… sorry bunk.

I was thinking of being re-baptised too, what do you think of spunk_whoreland or monk_fourskin?
Up to you dragit.

It is not BM's business. But if you do and you want to be known as those nics, I will not be so rude and disprespectful to not do as you wish.

It is known as basic manners.
GO must have missed the rule that said that in the Admin Forum one must talk in the third person.

GO apologises.


Australia...... Live it like we stole it....... Because we did.
User avatar
Dave McNamara
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5709
Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
Has thanked: 80 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485524Post Dave McNamara »

GrumpyOne wrote:GO must have missed the rule that said that in the Admin Forum one must talk in the third person.

GO apologises.
Easy mistake to make, GO.

Your concentration was clearly elsewhere. :mrgreen:








Image


It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
skeptic wrote: Tue 30 Jan 2024 8:07pmCongrats to Dave McNamara - hereby dubbed the KNOWINGEST KNOW IT ALL of Saintsational
:mrgreen:
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10190
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485537Post asiu »

that tickles gazrats humour centre
reminds him of the saab he doesnt own

:)

not that u people / avatars / GT's now know that of course
... i mean how could u
gaz isnt really here.


away with your all so yesterday 3rd person chit chat
... gaz takes it to no person chit chat.
beat that.


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485591Post Bunk_Moreland »

plugger66 wrote: Im not negative disagreeing with the ruling.
BM is gratified to hear this
plugger66 wrote: I reckon common sense should suggest it was a poor ruling.
BM suggests that someone who is not in control of all the facts cannot possibly conclude using common sense. BM suggests that you rephrase the sentence and begin it with "...I reckon ingnorance on my part suggests.."
plugger66 wrote:matter of fact had the ruling not be made I reckon this thread stops a while back.
Abiding by the decision and not complaining about it would have stopped the thread a while back
plugger66 wrote:And I think you can say something is stupid without being rude but i may go with dumb now. or petty.

You are free to go with whatever you like within forum rules. BM is free to intreprate your postings in any way BM sees fit, within forum rules
plugger66 wrote: You understand petty BM?
Yes, BM has read many of your posts.
plugger66 wrote: And even the real person typing this sometimes struggles with manners so i reckon that would also include p66 because no matter how hard the real person trys to be different to p66 he ends up the same. And if I canged my nic eventually the old p66 will come out.

That is your opinion. BM,and more importantly the mods dont share it.

plugger66 wrote: Get my drift BM?
No


You are garbage - Enough said
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485594Post Bunk_Moreland »

GrumpyOne wrote:
Bunk_Moreland wrote:
dragit wrote:BM will always be biGmarT to me… sorry bunk.

I was thinking of being re-baptised too, what do you think of spunk_whoreland or monk_fourskin?
Up to you dragit.

It is not BM's business. But if you do and you want to be known as those nics, I will not be so rude and disprespectful to not do as you wish.

It is known as basic manners.
GO must have missed the rule that said that in the Admin Forum one must talk in the third person.

GO apologises.
BM unreservedly accepts your apology GO


You are garbage - Enough said
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485612Post plugger66 »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Im not negative disagreeing with the ruling.
BM is gratified to hear this
plugger66 wrote: I reckon common sense should suggest it was a poor ruling.
BM suggests that someone who is not in control of all the facts cannot possibly conclude using common sense. BM suggests that you rephrase the sentence and begin it with "...I reckon ingnorance on my part suggests.."
plugger66 wrote:matter of fact had the ruling not be made I reckon this thread stops a while back.
Abiding by the decision and not complaining about it would have stopped the thread a while back
plugger66 wrote:And I think you can say something is stupid without being rude but i may go with dumb now. or petty.

You are free to go with whatever you like within forum rules. BM is free to intreprate your postings in any way BM sees fit, within forum rules
plugger66 wrote: You understand petty BM?
Yes, BM has read many of your posts.
plugger66 wrote: And even the real person typing this sometimes struggles with manners so i reckon that would also include p66 because no matter how hard the real person trys to be different to p66 he ends up the same. And if I canged my nic eventually the old p66 will come out.

That is your opinion. BM,and more importantly the mods dont share it.

plugger66 wrote: Get my drift BM?
No
Breaking down sentences does mean the responses make sense. Neither does playing dumb.


Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485633Post Bunk_Moreland »

plugger66 wrote: Breaking down sentences
Yes
plugger66 wrote:does mean the responses make sense.
Agreed

plugger66 wrote: Neither does playing dumb.
This does not make sense. Because P66 is incapable of thinking from an alternate PoV and rationale, P66 concludes all other PoV or rationales are dumb.

Powers of intuitive thinking limited????


You are garbage - Enough said
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485638Post plugger66 »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
plugger66 wrote: Breaking down sentences
Yes
plugger66 wrote:does mean the responses make sense.
Agreed

plugger66 wrote: Neither does playing dumb.
This does not make sense. Because P66 is incapable of thinking from an alternate PoV and rationale, P66 concludes all other PoV or rationales are dumb.

Powers of intuitive thinking limited????

No I think some other POV are fine. What I dont think is very grown up is another poster changing his nic and then somehow pretending he is another poster and somehow convincing the mods people should be getting warned for calling you the other name. Sounds petty and very childish. And that was doesnt mean responses make sense. Its important sometimes to read what you write otherwise people who break down sentences will do it to prove their point. Anyway BM I am still laughing as I type this stuff. And please call me f*** wit66 from now on as plugger66 has left the building.


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10190
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485639Post asiu »

Neither sentences make sense given the use of 'Neither' as keyword
in the second sentence.
Playing dumb is an artform.

.... fantastic contribution to ever decreasing circles.
Bravo.


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485640Post plugger66 »

Principle of Q'uo wrote:Neither sentences make sense given the use of 'Neither' as keyword
in the second sentence.
Playing dumb is an artform.

.... fantastic contribution to ever decreasing circles.
Bravo.
Thanks not that i know what you ever say.


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10190
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485643Post asiu »

Neither me you.

My pleasure.


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
Bunk_Moreland
SS Life Member
Posts: 3602
Joined: Wed 14 May 2014 7:45pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485646Post Bunk_Moreland »

plugger66 wrote: No I think some other POV are fine.

Well thats just dandy
plugger66 wrote:What I dont think is very grown up is another poster changing his nic and then somehow pretending he is another poster and somehow convincing the mods people should be getting warned for calling you the other name.
You can think that but you would be wrong, ignorantly wrong.
plugger66 wrote: Sounds petty and very childish.
yes, as petty and childish as someone with their noses out of joint because the mods made a ruling that they are incapable of understanding. So sad :cry:
plugger66 wrote:And that was doesnt mean responses make sense.
That doesn't make sense
plugger66 wrote: Its important sometimes to read what you write otherwise people who break down sentences will do it to prove their point.
Who does that? What I would suggest is that you complain to the moderators about posters replying to your posts by breaking up the salient points, so as to respond to the scatter gun like factoids thrown about in your posts. If the mods decide that this type of response is against forum rules, they can make a ruling in favour or not.

However please be adult enough to accept their ruling :wink:
plugger66 wrote:Anyway BM I am still laughing as I type this stuff.
Thank you for referring to me as BM. It has taken a while to get you to heel :D
plugger66 wrote:And please call me f*** wit66 from now on as plugger66 has left the building.
Have you had the mods disable the nic plugger66? How have you managed to post this with that nic then?

Once the nic f***wit66 is enabled and plugger66 is disabled, BM will be all means call you that if you want.

You see because BM has basic manners and shows respect, not just for the mods and their rulings, but for the poster with their simple request.

BM has not got a chip on his shoulder or a huge ego that rails against simple requests.

Just remember plugger66, you will lose you post count if plugger66 is disabled. Can you handle that?


You are garbage - Enough said
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485654Post plugger66 »

Bunk_Moreland wrote:
plugger66 wrote: No I think some other POV are fine.

Well thats just dandy
plugger66 wrote:What I dont think is very grown up is another poster changing his nic and then somehow pretending he is another poster and somehow convincing the mods people should be getting warned for calling you the other name.
You can think that but you would be wrong, ignorantly wrong.
plugger66 wrote: Sounds petty and very childish.
yes, as petty and childish as someone with their noses out of joint because the mods made a ruling that they are incapable of understanding. So sad :cry:
plugger66 wrote:And that was doesnt mean responses make sense.
That doesn't make sense
plugger66 wrote: Its important sometimes to read what you write otherwise people who break down sentences will do it to prove their point.
Who does that? What I would suggest is that you complain to the moderators about posters replying to your posts by breaking up the salient points, so as to respond to the scatter gun like factoids thrown about in your posts. If the mods decide that this type of response is against forum rules, they can make a ruling in favour or not.

However please be adult enough to accept their ruling :wink:
plugger66 wrote:Anyway BM I am still laughing as I type this stuff.
Thank you for referring to me as BM. It has taken a while to get you to heel :D
plugger66 wrote:And please call me f*** wit66 from now on as plugger66 has left the building.
Have you had the mods disable the nic plugger66? How have you managed to post this with that nic then?

Once the nic f***wit66 is enabled and plugger66 is disabled, BM will be all means call you that if you want.

You see because BM has basic manners and shows respect, not just for the mods and their rulings, but for the poster with their simple request.

BM has not got a chip on his shoulder or a huge ego that rails against simple requests.

Just remember plugger66, you will lose you post count if plugger66 is disabled. Can you handle that?

Firstly my nose is far from out of joint because I cant call you another name. Actually couldnt be much further from the truth. Secondly I gather you are implying I have a chip on my shoulder. Again you obviously dont know me because ive never had a chip on my shoulder. Well I did once but I soon ate it. . And thirdly i would 100% love to lose my post count. That would be the best thing that could happen. Mods please make it happen.


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10281
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 181 times
Been thanked: 675 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485656Post desertsaint »

Image


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10190
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485663Post asiu »

:)


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10190
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1485800Post asiu »

desertsaint wrote:Image

this should be our SS Posters Badge
for meet up drinkies , name day celebrations n game day recognition
... absolute Classic.

picks this place like a dirty nose.

Admin n budding Admin , Mods n budding Mods ,
need to heed , imho , its simple wisdom.


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4505
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 324 times
Been thanked: 397 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1486037Post loris »

Can someone tell me what is a 'big girl's blouse' ??????


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10190
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1486039Post asiu »

a guys dig at another guy.
... questioning their masculinity.

nice line.
nasty line.
cheeky line.

Context.


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10190
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1486056Post asiu »

questioning their masculine masculinity
not their feminine masculinity.


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1487353Post matrix »

you cant interpret something within the rules
you either interpret something or you dont

any rules have nothing to do with it

saying you can interpret something as long as its within the rules says you are only allowed to think by said rules, which would be nigh on impossible for a human being unless you were locked away in a cage for 10 years and conditioned to brainwashing

how you respond has lots to do with it however


User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10190
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1274 times
Been thanked: 899 times

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1487375Post asiu »


how you respond has lots to do with it however
as does ... the environment into which the response is made.

Politics is everywhere.

Reception has as many foibles as does Deliveries.


Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
Playon
Club Player
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2011 11:10am

Re: Nic discussion - moved from Longer and Hickey thread

Post: # 1489874Post Playon »

I've always enjoyed fruit loops and the sound of clucking chickens. Mostly


st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: St Kilda announcement - Tues morning - Dare

Post: # 1526667Post st.byron »

james rose wrote: Neither Joffa

<Warning issued for baiting>
Just offering friendly feedback ay.

Surely the first post deserved a warning too?
James, maybe you're not aware that around August last year it was made very clear that use of the nic Joffaboy in posts would be considered baiting and draw a warning. In ALL cases of people nevertheless using that nic in relation to a particular poster, a further reminder via PM was given that the nic is dead and further use would draw a warning.
Only when posters continued to disregard this request was a warning issued. There were a few warnings issued and use of that nic has pretty much been dead in the water over the last few months.
Saintspremiers was one poster previously warned for disregarding the request not to use that nic - back on August 10. So he knows very well the deal and his post served no purpose other than to bait and is a repeat of something previously warned for. No choice really but to issue a warning.

Re the other post you suggest was worthy of a warning. Thanks for the feedback but IMO it doesn't warrant a warning. The post was directly addressing a previous post. You could argue that use of the term 'clueless' could draw a warning for abuse as it's directed at the poster. But it's at the lower end of the name calling spectrum and is still in relation to a specific post, rather than just being name calling without context.

If anybody wants to add anything else re this issue, I'll split it off into the Admin Forum, as this thread is about the new Sponsorship deal with Dare.


Post Reply