fingers wrote:Getting this apology was driven by our president.
Good on him.
We can now put it in the over-flowing trophy cabinet with all those flags!
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
fingers wrote:Getting this apology was driven by our president.
You have to start somewhere.whiskers3614 wrote:Good on him.fingers wrote:Getting this apology was driven by our president.
We can now put it in the over-flowing trophy cabinet with all those flags!
Dermott has a lot of flags - my guess is that he has this onewhiskers3614 wrote:fingers wrote:Getting this apology was driven by our president.
Good on him.
We can now put it in the over-flowing trophy cabinet with all those flags!
gringo wrote:I heard that interview and it sounded like a straight defamation case. SEN shouldn't have exploited a vulnerable Dermie who was probably in an overly emotional state. I think Pelchen would have had a nice holiday if they didn't do the apology.
stinger wrote:gringo wrote:I heard that interview and it sounded like a straight defamation case. SEN shouldn't have exploited a vulnerable Dermie who was probably in an overly emotional state. I think Pelchen would have had a nice holiday if they didn't do the apology.
i'd say that sen has received a letter from the pelican's legal advisers threatening to sue their arses off if an apology was not immediately forthcoming.......
i'd still sue the bastards...and mark fine.....
Thanks for that. It clearly demonstrates how a little tweaking of the facts can be a damning fallacy.philtee wrote:
And here's the extract from Pelchen's letter to Members - "In June 2013, an extensive 40 page document was
presented to St Kilda's Board of Directors outlining a complex and deliberate list management and recruiting strategy
aimed at delivering the Saints its next AFL Premiership. This plan was based on similar strategies developed during
my time at Port Adelaide from 1996-2004 and Hawthorn from 2005-2011."
Not quite claiming the flag there. It's what any normal person would put on their CV, no?
in cut and dried cases such as this you can usually get both.....philtee wrote: IMHO - an outcome like this, a statement of retraction, is infinitely preferable to a damages
payout handed down by a court where no-one says "I'm sorry" or "I wuz wrong".
?
He's claiming responsibility for Port being 14th in 2000 and Hawthorn being 14th in 2005satchmo wrote:Thanks for that. It clearly demonstrates how a little tweaking of the facts can be a damning fallacy.philtee wrote:
And here's the extract from Pelchen's letter to Members - "In June 2013, an extensive 40 page document was
presented to St Kilda's Board of Directors outlining a complex and deliberate list management and recruiting strategy
aimed at delivering the Saints its next AFL Premiership. This plan was based on similar strategies developed during
my time at Port Adelaide from 1996-2004 and Hawthorn from 2005-2011."
Not quite claiming the flag there. It's what any normal person would put on their CV, no?
philtee wrote:The link to the retraction is on the right hand side of SEN home page, a short way down,
just under "Trade And Draft News" and above "Latest Audio".
And it takes you here - http://www.sen.com.au/display-article-2 ... chen/62953
fingers wrote:Getting this apology was driven by our president.
no reports in hard copy at all. the heraldsun hadit online and that was all.saintbrat wrote:did anyone find a report of the statement in the hard copy of either paper?
not in my editions( and time of statement not a reason)
and can't see on SEN home page http://www.sen.com.au/
and audio upload have dried up - no full program highlights at present.