PSD
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19099
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
PSD
Now Membrey is a Saint, will we still use our first pick in the PSD?
Do we even have capacity to use our first pick?
We have a coupla Adelaide boys training with us but few on here sound keen. Taylor Hunt is being picked up by Richmond apparently.
Are there any other candidates or likely types?
I can't remember too many clubs passing on pick one in the PSD. If we do, we'll get bagged for sure.
Do we even have capacity to use our first pick?
We have a coupla Adelaide boys training with us but few on here sound keen. Taylor Hunt is being picked up by Richmond apparently.
Are there any other candidates or likely types?
I can't remember too many clubs passing on pick one in the PSD. If we do, we'll get bagged for sure.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5815
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 106 times
Re: PSD
I thought Schneids was delisted to be (mature) rookied if we didn't have a better option(?)Saints94 wrote:Pretty sure we don't have the list space, although I wouldn't be against delisting a Simpkin or Sippos to get that pick, could be a Caleb Daniel etc..
So therefore he'd be the one in the gun, not Simpkin or Sippa'(?) Is that right?
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
Re: PSD
no...he's already been delisted...his spot was taken by membreyDave McNamara wrote:I thought Schneids was delisted to be (mature) rookied if we didn't have a better option(?)Saints94 wrote:Pretty sure we don't have the list space, although I wouldn't be against delisting a Simpkin or Sippos to get that pick, could be a Caleb Daniel etc..
So therefore he'd be the one in the gun, not Simpkin or Sippa'(?) Is that right?
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 19099
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1603 times
- Been thanked: 2018 times
Re: PSD
Makes for a good acronym….plugger66 wrote:PSD stands for get rid of it.
GROT
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
- Contact:
Re: PSD
As it stands the PSD is the only avenue for a player that is out of contract but has been offered a new one by the club and doesn't qualify for free agency to move clubs and be on a senior list.plugger66 wrote:PSD stands for get rid of it.
Until the rules change from the AFL then the PSD will stay.
Personally, I'd love to see a mid season draft.
Re: PSD
Life Long Saint wrote:As it stands the PSD is the only avenue for a player that is out of contract but has been offered a new one by the club and doesn't qualify for free agency to move clubs and be on a senior list.plugger66 wrote:PSD stands for get rid of it.
Until the rules change from the AFL then the PSD will stay.
Personally, I'd love to see a mid season draft.
If they didn't have it they would get a deal done. Probably wont go because the AFLPA wont want it to go but its a waste of time. We have first pick and probably aren't even using it. Not sure the mid season draft would work either. It didn't last time they had it.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
- Contact:
Re: PSD
When was that? At least 15 years ago wasn't it?plugger66 wrote:Not sure the mid season draft would work either. It didn't last time they had it.
Re: PSD
Life Long Saint wrote:When was that? At least 15 years ago wasn't it?plugger66 wrote:Not sure the mid season draft would work either. It didn't last time they had it.
Probably about then but what has changed to make it work this time? How does it work with list numbers, SC and where do you get the players from?
- Dave McNamara
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5815
- Joined: Wed 21 Sep 2011 2:44pm
- Location: Slotting another one from 94.5m out. Opposition flood? Bring it on...! Keep the faith Saintas!
- Has thanked: 98 times
- Been thanked: 106 times
Re: PSD
Thanks Sting. But doesn't that still mean that his being rookied (or not) depends on if we decide (or not) to rookie someone else?stinger wrote:no...he's already been delisted...his spot was taken by membreyDave McNamara wrote:I thought Schneids was delisted to be (mature) rookied if we didn't have a better option(?)Saints94 wrote:Pretty sure we don't have the list space, although I wouldn't be against delisting a Simpkin or Sippos to get that pick, could be a Caleb Daniel etc..
So therefore he'd be the one in the gun, not Simpkin or Sippa'(?) Is that right?
I mean, currently, we don't have to delist (say) Simpkin or Sippa' if we want to rookie Schnieds...?
Hi Pluggs, lets see if you still hate the PSD after the 2015 trading/drafting period.
It's Dave, man. Will you open up? I got the stuff with me! -------Who?
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
Dave, man. Open up ------------------------------------------ -----Dave???
Yeah, Dave. ---------------------------------------------------------Dave's not here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QOiG1hAr ... detailpage
Re: PSD
Dave McNamara wrote:Thanks Sting. But doesn't that still mean that his being rookied (or not) depends on if we decide (or not) to rookie someone else?stinger wrote:no...he's already been delisted...his spot was taken by membreyDave McNamara wrote:I thought Schneids was delisted to be (mature) rookied if we didn't have a better option(?)Saints94 wrote:Pretty sure we don't have the list space, although I wouldn't be against delisting a Simpkin or Sippos to get that pick, could be a Caleb Daniel etc..
So therefore he'd be the one in the gun, not Simpkin or Sippa'(?) Is that right?
I mean, currently, we don't have to delist (say) Simpkin or Sippa' if we want to rookie Schnieds...?
Hi Pluggs, lets see if you still hate the PSD after the 2015 trading/drafting period.
Pluggs? Who hates the PSD? I don't hate anyone or anything. Next year will be the same as this year. No real action apart from those who live in fantasyland.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2133
- Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
- Location: Rockville
- Has thanked: 587 times
- Been thanked: 178 times
Re: PSD
Didn't we get Bernie Harris via the mid season draft? Probably adds to your argument. I agree that the PSD isn't needed. If you want a player you pick them up as a delisted free agent.plugger66 wrote:Life Long Saint wrote:As it stands the PSD is the only avenue for a player that is out of contract but has been offered a new one by the club and doesn't qualify for free agency to move clubs and be on a senior list.plugger66 wrote:PSD stands for get rid of it.
Until the rules change from the AFL then the PSD will stay.
Personally, I'd love to see a mid season draft.
If they didn't have it they would get a deal done. Probably wont go because the AFLPA wont want it to go but its a waste of time. We have first pick and probably aren't even using it. Not sure the mid season draft would work either. It didn't last time they had it.
Let's face it, by the tome you get to the PSD the national draft has taken the best players, then the free agents and delisted free agents are gone. Who would be left? You're hardly likely to find a future star.
Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
Re: PSD
Life Long Saint wrote:When was that? At least 15 years ago wasn't it?plugger66 wrote:Not sure the mid season draft would work either. It didn't last time they had it.
1990 from memory.....i was in the us of a at the time.....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
Re: PSD
Dave McNamara wrote:Thanks Sting. But doesn't that still mean that his being rookied (or not) depends on if we decide (or not) to rookie someone else?stinger wrote:no...he's already been delisted...his spot was taken by membreyDave McNamara wrote:I thought Schneids was delisted to be (mature) rookied if we didn't have a better option(?)Saints94 wrote:Pretty sure we don't have the list space, although I wouldn't be against delisting a Simpkin or Sippos to get that pick, could be a Caleb Daniel etc..
So therefore he'd be the one in the gun, not Simpkin or Sippa'(?) Is that right?
I mean, currently, we don't have to delist (say) Simpkin or Sippa' if we want to rookie Schnieds...?
Hi Pluggs, lets see if you still hate the PSD after the 2015 trading/drafting period.
no...we can rookie schneids...but we would have to delist someone else to use our no pick in the psd...
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- mad saint guy
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7077
- Joined: Tue 26 Jul 2005 9:44pm
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 52 times
- Been thanked: 366 times
Re: PSD
spot on wrote:I think simpkin would be pretty nervous, his had enough time. I would down grade simpkin to the rookie
Simpkin is still solid backup. He showed in 2012 that he can hold down a key defensive post and do a decent job. If Delaney went down and we decided Bruce is needed up forward then Simpkin would be invaluable as he would be able to play a tight negating role while Fisher/Gilbert can still play their attacking game. With an injury-free pre season he should be a better player than he was this year as well.
Re: PSD
I just seen tanner smith has been delisted by the dockets after 2 seasons. He is a key back that went in the second round. Dockers will pick him up as a rookie , but can we just I'm and take him in the preseason draft? He is a full back at 195 cm and is surely more upside than simpkin. We need some key defender because wants going to happen when Delaney goes down and we can't rely on fisher or Gilbert to be fit
Re: PSD
Was just about to post the same thing myself. He was highly rated a couple of years ago. Good size and a vic boy he wouldn't be the worst pick up..spot on wrote:I just seen tanner smith has been delisted by the dockets after 2 seasons. He is a key back that went in the second round. Dockers will pick him up as a rookie , but can we just I'm and take him in the preseason draft? He is a full back at 195 cm and is surely more upside than simpkin. We need some key defender because wants going to happen when Delaney goes down and we can't rely on fisher or Gilbert to be fit
- WinnersOnly
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3059
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
- Location: Canberra
Re: PSD
Spot on I reckon the tall defenders in this year draft (McDonald, McLaren, Neilson, Keitl or Creeper) all look better options than Smith. Having said that they will go in the National Draft rather than the rookie - I think you will find we are interested in Le Grice as a rookie!spot on wrote:I just seen tanner smith has been delisted by the dockets after 2 seasons. He is a key back that went in the second round. Dockers will pick him up as a rookie , but can we just I'm and take him in the preseason draft? He is a full back at 195 cm and is surely more upside than simpkin. We need some key defender because wants going to happen when Delaney goes down and we can't rely on fisher or Gilbert to be fit
SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
Re: PSD
Is Le Grice big enough to play on the monster forwards? He reminds me more of a Simkin type..WinnersOnly wrote:Spot on I reckon the tall defenders in this year draft (McDonald, McLaren, Neilson, Keitl or Creeper) all look better options than Smith. Having said that they will go in the National Draft rather than the rookie - I think you will find we are interested in Le Grice as a rookie!spot on wrote:I just seen tanner smith has been delisted by the dockets after 2 seasons. He is a key back that went in the second round. Dockers will pick him up as a rookie , but can we just I'm and take him in the preseason draft? He is a full back at 195 cm and is surely more upside than simpkin. We need some key defender because wants going to happen when Delaney goes down and we can't rely on fisher or Gilbert to be fit
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: PSD
Interesting that PC had Tanner coming to us in 2012
http://boundforglorynews.com/2012-afl-phantom-draft/
http://boundforglorynews.com/2012-afl-phantom-draft/
Re: PSD
He only got pick 1 and the two father son selections correct in the top 30. Knows his stuff!!Con Gorozidis wrote:Interesting that PC had Tanner coming to us in 2012
http://boundforglorynews.com/2012-afl-phantom-draft/