2016 Finals Thread

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply

Which team do you hope wins the 2016 AFL Premiership?

Swines
4
15%
Sheepshafters
0
No votes
Poos&Wees
7
27%
HSP Giants
4
15%
Liquorice Allsorts
4
15%
Wet Toast
0
No votes
Footascray
7
27%
Norf Smellbin
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 26

Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11291
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 433 times

2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635458Post Sainternist »

Gee whiz, it has now been five years of AFL Finals ennui for us Saints faithful.

What is the general consensus of the teams having a week off before the finals commence? I just heard Eddie Betts in an interview on 774 am radio before and he sounded rather indifferent about it.

Anyway, I've decided I want Hawthorn to win their fourth straight premiership, as the Bulldogs have a snowflake's chance in hell of winning and as far as I'm concerned the other clubs can just plain go to hell. Also, to win four straight flags is an incredible feat, which has only happened once in the history VFL/AFL footy, only that the Filth can boast about. Would be great to see it happen for the first time in eighty-odd years.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 2793
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 720 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635603Post shrodes »

I really struggled to decipher a lot of those team names.

Anyway, I hope Adelaide after what they went through last year. I don't really rate their chances though.


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11291
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635681Post Sainternist »

shrodes wrote:I really struggled to decipher a lot of those team names.
Just to clarify: Swines are Sydney; Sheepshafters is Geelong; Poos&Wees are Hawthorn; HSP Giants are GWS Giants; Liquorice All Sorts is Adelaide; Wet Toast are the West Coast Eagles; Footascray are the Western Bulldogs and Norf Smellbin are the North Melbourne Kangaroos.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
Saints94
SS Life Member
Posts: 3443
Joined: Wed 31 Jan 2007 10:47am
Location: NSW
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 1 time
Contact:

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635696Post Saints94 »

Go Crows.


User avatar
White Winmar
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5014
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 10:02pm

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635715Post White Winmar »

Sainternist wrote:Gee whiz, it has now been five years of AFL Finals ennui for us Saints faithful.

What is the general consensus of the teams having a week off before the finals commence? I just heard Eddie Betts in an interview on 774 am radio before and he sounded rather indifferent about it.

Anyway, I've decided I want Hawthorn to win their fourth straight premiership, as the Bulldogs have a snowflake's chance in hell of winning and as far as I'm concerned the other clubs can just plain go to hell. Also, to win four straight flags is an incredible feat, which has only happened once in the history VFL/AFL footy, only that the Filth can boast about. Would be great to see it happen for the first time in eighty-odd years.
Go to the top of the class for the correct, in context, use of the word ennui ( pronounced on wee). Well done, Sainternist.


I started with nothing and I've got most of it left!
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635742Post st.byron »

Sainternist wrote:
shrodes wrote:I really struggled to decipher a lot of those team names.
Just to clarify: Swines are Sydney; Sheepshafters is Geelong; Poos&Wees are Hawthorn; HSP Giants are GWS Giants; Liquorice All Sorts is Adelaide; Wet Toast are the West Coast Eagles; Footascray are the Western Bulldogs and Norf Smellbin are the North Melbourne Kangaroos.

Made me laugh. Sheepshafters. Liquorice Allsorts. I voted for Liquorice Allsorts just because of the name. Really really really really really really don't want WCE, Sheepshafters, Sydney to win. Otherwise.......meh.....


noddy04
Club Player
Posts: 709
Joined: Thu 19 Mar 2009 3:51pm
Been thanked: 5 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635774Post noddy04 »

I would like to see hawthorn win it again. My reasons are i dont know any Hawthorn supporters so i wouldnt have to listen to their bragging. I especially DONT want the Crows to win It would be shite in this state again.


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11291
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635859Post Sainternist »

White Winmar wrote:Go to the top of the class for the correct, in context, use of the word ennui ( pronounced on wee). Well done, Sainternist.
Hahahaha Cheers, White Winmar!

I love that word. It has rubbed off on me from reading the likes of Camus and Sartre and also watching movies from all of those great French filmmakers that came out of the 50s and 60s who were big on existentialism.
st.byron wrote:Made me laugh. Sheepshafters. Liquorice Allsorts. I voted for Liquorice Allsorts just because of the name. Really really really really really really don't want WCE, Sheepshafters, Sydney to win. Otherwise.......meh.....
Glad it was of amusement to you, Byron. Actually, I think Barks4eve may have come up with Sheepshafters for Geelong. There's another wave to old Barks!


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
MCG-Unit
SS Life Member
Posts: 3127
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 4:04pm
Location: Docklands
Has thanked: 438 times
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635878Post MCG-Unit »

Geelong

Swans
GWS Giants
W Bulldogs
Last edited by MCG-Unit on Sun 18 Sep 2016 5:09pm, edited 1 time in total.


Your servants shall hold her stones dear, and have pity on her dust :shock:
User avatar
Life Long Saint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5391
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 453 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635918Post Life Long Saint »

I can't recall the last time I was this disinterested in a finals series.

There are no teams in the eight that I would like to see win the flag.
Sydney would be the highest on my least preferred.
Don't want to see Geelong or Hawthorn win...and the rest can't win it anyway.

Very uninspiring series ahead.

The AFL have their fantasy match this weekend between GWS and Sydney...they're just missing Gold Coast for a threesome.


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2029
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 211 times
Been thanked: 335 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1635921Post freely »

Will only get interesting if north and the bulldogs win their first games. Highly unlikely, but would add some spice.
In the meantime, I'm sticking with Lenny and the Giants.


Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11291
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636034Post Sainternist »

freely wrote:Will only get interesting if north and the bulldogs win their first games. Highly unlikely, but would add some spice.
In the meantime, I'm sticking with Lenny and the Giants.
Would be fantastic if the Bulldogs to upset the Weagles in Perth. I don't see that one as an impossibility. North Melbourne, on the other hand, are stone motherless.

I had forgotten that Lenny was an assistant with the Giants. They seem relatively inoffensive for the time being. Of course with them being an AFL love child won't have me wanting them as a "second team", but at least they don't come across as an arrogant club, like the Weagles have always been. Would love it we got Lenny back as an assistant for our midfield.
Life Long Saint wrote:I can't recall the last time I was this disinterested in a finals series.

...Very uninspiring series ahead..
Hahahaha... Ennui is definitely the operative word for your enthusiasm towards the finals, LLS!


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10335
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 682 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636038Post desertsaint »

freely wrote:Will only get interesting if north and the bulldogs win their first games. Highly unlikely, but would add some spice.
In the meantime, I'm sticking with Lenny and the Giants.
would make it even more of a sure thing for the top four sides. at the moment west coast have momentum, and adelaide's best can challange; north and the bulldogs are dead. although i'd expect the dogs to thrash west coast by some fifty odd points.
Last edited by desertsaint on Fri 09 Sep 2016 2:25am, edited 1 time in total.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636253Post BigMart »

WCE are not getting the usual soft free kicks they normally get... Probably because it's s national audience not just supporter audience and the umps have instructed to umpire what they see, not what they hear

#33 and #4
For the Eagles should be ashamed of some of their efforts in an afl final.

The Eagles don't play finals footy... Regardless of result
They play Subi footy that won't stand up under pressure or on different ground


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18490
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1515 times
Been thanked: 1868 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636256Post SaintPav »

Cripps play well


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636259Post BigMart »

Not really... Non functioning fwd line

4 goals in three quarters ... Their whole team is having a mare

The ruckman is doing ok


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18490
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1515 times
Been thanked: 1868 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636261Post SaintPav »

Was being sarcastic


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636262Post Trev from the Bush »

SaintPav wrote:Cripps play well
Really?

Get over him.


Saint supporter since '62
Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636263Post Trev from the Bush »

SaintPav wrote:Was being sarcastic
Sorry Pav, so you were.

Doggies have been absolutely fantastic. Hope they still have a quarter tank of fuel left. Deserve all the plaudits they will get for this performance!


Saint supporter since '62
StPeter
Club Player
Posts: 1215
Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
Location: StKilda East
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 216 times
Contact:

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636264Post StPeter »

It makes a difference when the WCE don't get a free ride from the umpires.

Actually I thought the match has generally been umpired well.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30058
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 704 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636267Post saintsRrising »

Dogs looked outstanding all night. Greater hunger, quicker and wuth better execution. Even big Tom looked ok for a change.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11291
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636271Post Sainternist »

Great to see the Bulldogs get up. Gee, they must have seen that week off as being heaven sent.


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10335
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 682 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636274Post desertsaint »

desertsaint wrote:
freely wrote:Will only get interesting if north and the bulldogs win their first games. Highly unlikely, but would add some spice.
In the meantime, I'm sticking with Lenny and the Giants.
would make it even more of a sure thing for the top four sides. at the moment west coast have momentum, and adelaide's best can challange; north and the bulldogs are dead. although i'd expect the dogs to thrash west coast by some fifty odd points.
yeah right :roll:


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5996
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 359 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636282Post MC Gusto »

Geez caleb Daniel is a handy little player. His kicking within 40m is pinpoint

He's a draft regret of mine I must admit was really hoping we took him when he was still there at 42 or whatever it was we took Lonie with

Still think Lonie will be a player but caleb looks really good


#1 Ryder fan
supersaints
Club Player
Posts: 1701
Joined: Fri 18 May 2007 11:13am
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: 2016 Finals Thread

Post: # 1636632Post supersaints »

Thought Norf would food like a cheap deck chair. Their run of early wins against the lower sides and teams out of form hid some huge cracks. It's a pity we couldn't beat them and take their spot. I think we would have given a better contest.


And the president said " I did not have sex with that woman"
And our former president said " Football is like golf" 

Go Sainters !!!!!
Post Reply