Point Proven?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Johnny Member
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4157
Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Point Proven?

Post: # 1689214Post Johnny Member »

As a supporter you can't be upset about the overall effort of the players last night. There were some ordinary efforts at times, but overall it was very good.


But..... I think tonight proved a point - pressure and effort isn't enough.


Port made 87 Clangers, and were -9 in the Free Kick count. Their Disposal Efficiency was only 61% and they usually go at 70%.


Yet we lost!

They are the sort of numbers that a 'high pressure' game causes. That's the point of 'pressure' - to reduce the efficiency of your opponent.



But....we had 54 Inside 50s and only scored 61 points.

We had 50 Rebound 50s and only scored 61 points. Essendon are number 1 in the comp for Rebound 50s - and they only average 40 per game. We had 50! 50 Rebound 50s and 54 Inside 50s and we only scored 61 points??!

To put that into perspective, Gold Coast only scored a feeble 65 points yesterday against Richmond. But they only had 30 Rebound 50s and 34 Inside 50s.



The real problem is, that isn't an aberration. It's becoming the norm. It's becoming the norm to see us rudderless coming out of D50. It's becoming the norm to see us look like headless chooks through the midfield and turn it over. And it is the norm to see us 'bomb it in to the hot spot' time and time again without reward.


We're either well drilled, because we do the same thing every week, and we're so lacking in talent that we can't execute it well enough.

Or we're really poorly coached and the players are doing what they're asked to do.


Either way, we have a problem.



Pressure, being 'strong', being 'solid' and having 'effort' is not enough.


longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: Point Proven?

Post: # 1689218Post longtimesaint »

You have to take into account that it was wet and slippery and a lot different to playing at Etihad.


One year will be our year
User avatar
borderbarry
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6676
Joined: Mon 19 Apr 2004 11:22pm
Location: Wodonga

Re: Point Proven?

Post: # 1689220Post borderbarry »

Next week against WestCoast we should have two big marking players return, Roo and Marshall. Surely they would have been handy yesterday.


Bruce G McAbee
Club Player
Posts: 1965
Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2015 7:09pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 185 times

Re: Point Proven?

Post: # 1689221Post Bruce G McAbee »

longtimesaint wrote:You have to take into account that it was wet and slippery and a lot different to playing at Etihad.
We don't score well at Etihad either. We can't apply enough scoreboard pressure.


Think of me long enough to make a memory.
takeaway
Club Player
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Point Proven?

Post: # 1689222Post takeaway »

It was a messy game. I think the weather had something to do with it. Stats are only any good when you are comparing like with like.
I agree there are some problems, but that comes with a developing team.


User avatar
Johnny Member
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4157
Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Point Proven?

Post: # 1689224Post Johnny Member »

Jake Carlisle wasn't too bothered with the conditions.


takeaway
Club Player
Posts: 1775
Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 5:54pm
Has thanked: 119 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Point Proven?

Post: # 1689227Post takeaway »

Johnny Member wrote:Jake Carlisle wasn't too bothered with the conditions.
Agree, he played fairly well, but a number of his intercept marks were due to poor entry by Port, and the conditions were part of that.


User avatar
Johnny Member
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4157
Joined: Thu 05 Oct 2006 12:27pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Point Proven?

Post: # 1689229Post Johnny Member »

takeaway wrote:
Johnny Member wrote:Jake Carlisle wasn't too bothered with the conditions.
Agree, he played fairly well, but a number of his intercept marks were due to poor entry by Port, and the conditions were part of that.
Not necessarily referring to his game overall, just the fact that he was clean. He one-grabbed the ball, and hit targets.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18472
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1797 times
Been thanked: 814 times

Re: Point Proven?

Post: # 1689231Post bigcarl »

Johnny Member wrote:

we had 54 Inside 50s and only scored 61 points. [/b]
Story of the season unfortunately. How many times have we had more of the ball and lost? Putting it on the board - building scoreboard pressure - has to be a priority over summer.


Post Reply