Saintsational Fan Forum - A passionate community of St Kilda Football Club fans discussing news, history, players, trade rumours, results, AFL stats and more.
Secret Kiel wrote: ↑Tue 19 Nov 2019 6:40pm
sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?
oh ok I see what you are doing the ole Sargent Schultz routine
Considering you are all over everything stkilda I would have thought you are very well aware of his off field performance
hint google Dan Hannebery beer and then sit back for a good read
oh and some players get paid too much for pretty well nothing
oh please, Bigfooty, really. Look for the record I couldn't give a stuff if he loves a beer or 10 and some chemical or herbal enhancement, there aren't too many clubs around Australia, (at all levels), where the boys are carving it up on the weekends and holidays. These are good ole Australian lads, decent lads, going about their lives, why the need to demonise them and treat them like they are some low life's.
So why be so defensive at the suggestion that he may have had some beer.
Secret Kiel wrote: ↑Tue 19 Nov 2019 9:09pm
oh please, Bigfooty, really. Look for the record I couldn't give a stuff if he loves a beer or 10 and some chemical or herbal enhancement, there aren't too many clubs around Australia, (at all levels), where the boys are carving it up on the weekends and holidays. These are good ole Australian lads, decent lads, going about their lives, why the need to demonise them and treat them like they are some low life's.
Yep you have gone the comedy routine
No one mentioned bigfooty but notice you like to use that reference to try justify your point
As I said Google those terms and there are plenty of articles on the subject
In regard to you casting rumours on his drug taking habits I would be very worried if I were you as saynta will now have to dob you in to the the mod
btw your formula is wrong according to AS 1657, maybe someone should audit the steps and see if Hannebery can make a workers comp claim or sue her sister.
The formula for relating the depth of treads and the height of risers was developed by Francois Blondel, a French architect, in 17th century. Based on observations of people’ gaits, the formula suggested that twice the riser height plus the tread depth should be between 610 mm and 635 mm. While there have been variations across the countries in applying this formula, it has been widely adopted in stair building.
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
asiu wrote: ↑Wed 20 Nov 2019 10:40am
don’t bother nobend
The formula for relating the depth of treads and the height of risers was developed by Francois Blondel, a French architect, in 17th century. Based on observations of people’ gaits, the formula suggested that twice the riser height plus the tread depth should be between 610 mm and 635 mm. While there have been variations across the countries in applying this formula, it has been widely adopted in stair building.
The combination of twice the riser plus the going (2R+G) shall be not less than 540mm, and not greater than 700mm.
A riser shall not be less than 130mm and not greater than 225mm
The going shall be not less than 215mm and not greater than 335mm.
All risers and goings in the same flight of stairs shall be uniform dimensions within a tolerance of plus or minus 5mm.
There is more but you get my drift, your formula was wrong, and I should have added very incomplete in terms of what is required for the design of stairs to be compliant with AS 1657.
Secret Kiel wrote: ↑Tue 19 Nov 2019 6:40pm
sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?
First time I am fully in agreement with your post. All this bulls*** about Hanners drinking or on drugs, Is just that. Unsubstantiated bullshirt.
And I would have thought , in clear breach of forum rules.
wooohh up boy, not sure what a bullshirt is..maybe some sort of bull apparel , but surely we are welcome to our own assumptions on what may have occurred ?
your gagging of such may be in breach.
Mods ????
ABUSING OR DEMEANING A SAINTS PLAYER, FAMILY OR OFFICIAL RULE
Commenting on the performance of a Saints player / official is allowed. Review their performance and suggest where or how they can improve. In cases where posters abuse or demean a Saints player / official / or their family, OR casts aspersions on their character and it is deemed by the moderators to be offensive and inflammatory, then the moderators will issue a 1 DAY or 1 WEEK BAN depending on severity
Secret Kiel wrote: ↑Tue 19 Nov 2019 6:40pm
sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?
First time I am fully in agreement with your post. All this bulls*** about Hanners drinking or on drugs, Is just that. Unsubstantiated bullshirt.
And I would have thought , in clear breach of forum rules.
wooohh up boy, not sure what a bullshirt is..maybe some sort of bull apparel , but surely we are welcome to our own assumptions on what may have occurred ?
your gagging of such may be in breach.
Mods ????
ABUSING OR DEMEANING A SAINTS PLAYER, FAMILY OR OFFICIAL RULE
Commenting on the performance of a Saints player / official is allowed. Review their performance and suggest where or how they can improve. In cases where posters abuse or demean a Saints player / official / or their family, OR casts aspersions on their character and it is deemed by the moderators to be offensive and inflammatory, then the moderators will issue a 1 DAY or 1 WEEK BAN depending on severity
So by intimating that he may have had a few too many I am demeaning him??? that's "BullShirt" Damn..everyone has had a few too many at one stage...are you some sort of mary poppins ?
To me, if he fell down steps because he had a few I would see that as normal.. maybe you need some time off Mary.
Secret Kiel wrote: ↑Tue 19 Nov 2019 6:40pm
sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?
First time I am fully in agreement with your post. All this bulls*** about Hanners drinking or on drugs, Is just that. Unsubstantiated bullshirt.
And I would have thought , in clear breach of forum rules.
wooohh up boy, not sure what a bullshirt is..maybe some sort of bull apparel , but surely we are welcome to our own assumptions on what may have occurred ?
your gagging of such may be in breach.
Mods ????
ABUSING OR DEMEANING A SAINTS PLAYER, FAMILY OR OFFICIAL RULE
Commenting on the performance of a Saints player / official is allowed. Review their performance and suggest where or how they can improve. In cases where posters abuse or demean a Saints player / official / or their family, OR casts aspersions on their character and it is deemed by the moderators to be offensive and inflammatory, then the moderators will issue a 1 DAY or 1 WEEK BAN depending on severity
So by intimating that he may have had a few too many I am demeaning him??? that's "BullShirt" Damn..everyone has had a few too many at one stage...are you some sort of mary poppins ?
To me, if he fell down steps because he had a few I would see that as normal.. maybe you need some time off Mary.
bulls*** . You and others have no facts that Hanners was drinking and you are all having fun , with no reason, at his expense. keep it up and someone will report you. And for the record I don't drink and find your comment calling me Mary Poppins insulting.
Secret Kiel wrote: ↑Tue 19 Nov 2019 6:40pm
sheez talk about running someones character into the ground, AFL players don't get paid enough, imagine having to live a life under suspicion all the time and always being guilty and never presumed innocent. Do any of these beliefs around Hannebery's character have any basis in fact or is it just the unsubstantiated internet rumours that did the rounds a few years ago?
First time I am fully in agreement with your post. All this bulls*** about Hanners drinking or on drugs, Is just that. Unsubstantiated bullshirt.
And I would have thought , in clear breach of forum rules.
wooohh up boy, not sure what a bullshirt is..maybe some sort of bull apparel , but surely we are welcome to our own assumptions on what may have occurred ?
your gagging of such may be in breach.
Mods ????
ABUSING OR DEMEANING A SAINTS PLAYER, FAMILY OR OFFICIAL RULE
Commenting on the performance of a Saints player / official is allowed. Review their performance and suggest where or how they can improve. In cases where posters abuse or demean a Saints player / official / or their family, OR casts aspersions on their character and it is deemed by the moderators to be offensive and inflammatory, then the moderators will issue a 1 DAY or 1 WEEK BAN depending on severity
So by intimating that he may have had a few too many I am demeaning him??? that's "BullShirt" Damn..everyone has had a few too many at one stage...are you some sort of mary poppins ?
To me, if he fell down steps because he had a few I would see that as normal.. maybe you need some time off Mary.
bulls*** . You and others have no facts that Hanners was drinking and you are all having fun , with no reason, at his expense. keep it up and someone will report you. And for the record I don't drink and find your comment calling me Mary Poppins insulting.
You are an outstandingly, astonishingly angry man. This is a football fans' forum.
Jordan De Goey was 'playing fetch with his dog when his hand hit a door' and then...
A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤ and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.