Score Review
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Score Review
Is the goal the back of the goal post or the line on the ground?
The Dogs just kicked a goal by Bont - the vision showed it was millimetres in it at the back of the goal post but the line is the back of the padding - the back of the padding is an inch behind the goal post.
They reviewed the thing and still got it wrong.
The Dogs just kicked a goal by Bont - the vision showed it was millimetres in it at the back of the goal post but the line is the back of the padding - the back of the padding is an inch behind the goal post.
They reviewed the thing and still got it wrong.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18635
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
- Has thanked: 1979 times
- Been thanked: 865 times
Re: Score Review
Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 9:22pm Is the goal the back of the goal post or the line on the ground?
The Dogs just kicked a goal by Bont - the vision showed it was millimetres in it at the back of the goal post but the line is the back of the padding - the back of the padding is an inch behind the goal post.
They reviewed the thing and still got it wrong.
Good point. I think it is the back of the post
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Sat 20 Apr 2013 10:51pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Score Review
So they reviewed it to the back of the goal post - not the goal line - major stuff up - and easy to see that the ball was still partially on the ground side of the line if you continue the line up from the padding.
Can they get nothing right - even on review?
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8583
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1532 times
Re: Score Review
And the camera is not fixed to the back of the padding, so it’s not inline with the goal line to start with.
The second view seemed to show it was clearly touched.
The second view seemed to show it was clearly touched.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 635
- Joined: Sat 20 Apr 2013 10:51pm
- Has thanked: 28 times
- Been thanked: 125 times
Re: Score Review
Yep.kosifantutti wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 9:59pm And the camera is not fixed to the back of the padding, so it’s not inline with the goal line to start with.
The second view seemed to show it was clearly touched.
The opposite goal post camera showed it wasn't even past the post. It seems a flawed system in many ways. I guess the only consolation is the umpire would have awarded a goal with no review anyway. Doesn't make it right
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10781
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 828 times
Re: Score Review
The second view clearly showed the AFL is cheating.kosifantutti wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 9:59pm And the camera is not fixed to the back of the padding, so it’s not inline with the goal line to start with.
The second view seemed to show it was clearly touched.
Absolutely touched before the whole of the ball was through the goals.
Now we have to face an angry West Coast and a rival to play finals has been gifted four points.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Score Review
No review technology in the Melbourne Game
Incorrect Review in the Bulldogs v WCE Game
Calling it now - we WILL miss the finals
/Buying Aluminium Fool to make a hat!!!
Incorrect Review in the Bulldogs v WCE Game
Calling it now - we WILL miss the finals
/Buying Aluminium Fool to make a hat!!!
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Score Review
Sorry Kosi but if it was clearly touched surely they would over rule.The vision I saw on the replay seemed to be clearly over the line so maybe I"m not looking at the second view I'm confusedkosifantutti wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 9:59pm And the camera is not fixed to the back of the padding, so it’s not inline with the goal line to start with.
The second view seemed to show it was clearly touched.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8583
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1532 times
Re: Score Review
We didn’t see the second view until after they paid the goal.bangaulegend wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 10:23pmSorry Kosi but if it was clearly touched surely they would over rule.The vision I saw on the replay seemed to be clearly over the line so maybe I"m not looking at the second view I'm confusedkosifantutti wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 9:59pm And the camera is not fixed to the back of the padding, so it’s not inline with the goal line to start with.
The second view seemed to show it was clearly touched.
You must have seen something different if the ball was clearly over the line. Even the arc didn’t make a call.
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8583
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1532 times
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2490
- Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 546 times
Re: Score Review
Fair enough mate still confused but that's not unusualkosifantutti wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 10:30pmWe didn’t see the second view until after they paid the goal.bangaulegend wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 10:23pmSorry Kosi but if it was clearly touched surely they would over rule.The vision I saw on the replay seemed to be clearly over the line so maybe I"m not looking at the second view I'm confusedkosifantutti wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 9:59pm And the camera is not fixed to the back of the padding, so it’s not inline with the goal line to start with.
The second view seemed to show it was clearly touched.
You must have seen something different if the ball was clearly over the line. Even the arc didn’t make a call.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 138 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Score Review
The umpire call is huge
If that umpire calls touched then the Eagles likely win that game
I know its a judgement call but should the umpire give benefit of the doubt to a behind instead of a goal if its mm close?
If that was an elimination final the Eagles would have been filthy
If that umpire calls touched then the Eagles likely win that game
I know its a judgement call but should the umpire give benefit of the doubt to a behind instead of a goal if its mm close?
If that was an elimination final the Eagles would have been filthy
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10457
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1329 times
Re: Score Review
You’d think theyed have learnt after the mistake that cost us the game last week.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30096
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Score Review
Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Sun 06 Sep 2020 9:22pm Is the goal the back of the goal post or the line on the ground?
I don't know what the rule is, but the goal umpire always is looking up and would check the ball against the back on the goalpost. This is the only way they can do it as it would be impossible fora goal umpire to check a ball many metres in the air against the line below.
Also a behind is always signalled even if the ball hits the back of the goalpost.
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
- magnifisaint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8140
- Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
- Has thanked: 228 times
- Been thanked: 610 times
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10781
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 828 times
Re: Score Review
Once upon a time the goal umpires call was all that mattered.
I remember being in the perfect position to observe a ball bisect and goal and behind posts.
The goal umpire no where the goal post, gave it as a goal.
Everyone around me was laughing at the error.
That was in a time when only the final quarter of one game would be shown on black & white TV.
But when the TV started showing full matches these goal umpiring errors were exposed.
The AFL was forced to introduce reviews to prevent these howlers when games and teams season were effected.
But then TV started to expose the goal umpires inability to judge closed touched decisions.
The AFL introduced goal line cameras.
But the cameras were and are not adequate, they are not fast enough or have sufficient resolution, so a soft call of the goal umpire had to be clearly wrong for an overturn.
As Kosi's still proves the ARC umpire did not do his job properly concentrating on one camera angle that was inclusive due the camera speed being too slow.
He clearly did not look at the second angle that shows the ball conclusively touched before all of the ball is behind all of the goal post.
The error occurred so close to the end of the game it did not just influence the result it DID decide the result of the game.
The inevitable AFL apology / excuse will not change the result.
The Bulldogs will keep 4 undeserved points.
It may prevent St Kilda playing finals and West Coast receiving the double chance.
I remember being in the perfect position to observe a ball bisect and goal and behind posts.
The goal umpire no where the goal post, gave it as a goal.
Everyone around me was laughing at the error.
That was in a time when only the final quarter of one game would be shown on black & white TV.
But when the TV started showing full matches these goal umpiring errors were exposed.
The AFL was forced to introduce reviews to prevent these howlers when games and teams season were effected.
But then TV started to expose the goal umpires inability to judge closed touched decisions.
The AFL introduced goal line cameras.
But the cameras were and are not adequate, they are not fast enough or have sufficient resolution, so a soft call of the goal umpire had to be clearly wrong for an overturn.
As Kosi's still proves the ARC umpire did not do his job properly concentrating on one camera angle that was inclusive due the camera speed being too slow.
He clearly did not look at the second angle that shows the ball conclusively touched before all of the ball is behind all of the goal post.
The error occurred so close to the end of the game it did not just influence the result it DID decide the result of the game.
The inevitable AFL apology / excuse will not change the result.
The Bulldogs will keep 4 undeserved points.
It may prevent St Kilda playing finals and West Coast receiving the double chance.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA