Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Bowey Boy
- Club Player
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005 7:15pm
- Location: Animal Enclosure
- Has thanked: 184 times
- Been thanked: 93 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Er no apparently.
"I think, 'You kick a footy mate, you kick a footy. It's not like you've got a cure for cancer. You kick a footy, stop thinking you are so special'." - Samantha Black
- saintsRrising
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 30096
- Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
- Location: Melbourne
- Has thanked: 711 times
- Been thanked: 1234 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Just imagine what he would go for if he had of been driving his carDevilhead wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 1:27am
Lynch has no eyes for the ball firstly - this is very clear
Carless conduct - could easily go Intentional
High contact - elbow to head
Medium to High impact - head split open
Potential to cause Injury - High - though this is only used for Ben Long so will not be taken into account
Final deliberation - 1 to 2 weeks - depending on Impact grading
Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1928
- Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
- Has thanked: 7 times
- Been thanked: 90 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
I wonder whether Ben Long would’ve been given the same punishment? That’s Lynch’s fifth penalty this year.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 138 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Was Lynch hit on Paton even looked at?
Cotchin?
Cotchin?
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Second Only according to the MRP Statement:
Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Misconduct. The incident was classified as a $1250 sanction as a second offence. The player can accept a $750 sanction with an early plea.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
What about that grub Cotchin?
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23139
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 9080 times
- Been thanked: 3942 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
That's just pure crap as he was cited three times in just two matches earlier in the season.Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:48pmSecond Only according to the MRP Statement:
Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Misconduct. The incident was classified as a $1250 sanction as a second offence. The player can accept a $750 sanction with an early plea.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1834
- Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
- Has thanked: 227 times
- Been thanked: 348 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
https://www.smh.com.au/sport/afl/tigers ... 563uv.html
Cotchin’s head high tackle and sling to the ground ‘just a part of the game”. Michael Christian you are a joke.
Cotchin’s head high tackle and sling to the ground ‘just a part of the game”. Michael Christian you are a joke.
Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8393
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 138 times
- Been thanked: 1174 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Wow so they didn't even look at Lynch's elbow to the back of Paton's head which split him open
Footage clearly shows he didn't have eyes on the ball and his arm was bent
Paton with blood flowing from his head has to go off for treatment
If that was Carlisle it would be minimum 2 weeks
Footage clearly shows he didn't have eyes on the ball and his arm was bent
Paton with blood flowing from his head has to go off for treatment
If that was Carlisle it would be minimum 2 weeks
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10457
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1329 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Bad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pmIt cost us what?Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pmOur mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pmTrue, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.
Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.
Our mistakes are irrelevant.
It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Ahh - Saynta my friend - you are technically correct - which is the best kind of correct.saynta wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:05pmThat's just pure crap as he was cited three times in just two matches earlier in the season.Sainter_Dad wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:48pmSecond Only according to the MRP Statement:
Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Misconduct. The incident was classified as a $1250 sanction as a second offence. The player can accept a $750 sanction with an early plea.
Apparently - Misconduct is classified as different from striking.
"It is the fifth time this season that Lynch has attracted MRO attention for an incident.
He has had two fines for striking (Gold Coast's Sam Collins and Jarrod Witts), was fined for misconduct on Brisbane's Alex Witherden and was sent to the tribunal for a strike to Bomber Michael Hurley's neck."
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6080
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1568 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
We'll at a 50/50 chance, that's 2 goals tops.CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:15pmBad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pmIt cost us what?Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pmOur mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pmTrue, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.
Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.
Our mistakes are irrelevant.
It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10781
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 828 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Review complete
Only Lynch gets $750 fine for putting his knee into Howard's neck.
$750 that's like a $75 fine to most people.
Flogged, flogged, flogged with feather.
Time to feed the Christian to the lions and bring an independent muslim.
Only Lynch gets $750 fine for putting his knee into Howard's neck.
$750 that's like a $75 fine to most people.
Flogged, flogged, flogged with feather.
Time to feed the Christian to the lions and bring an independent muslim.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10457
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 1329 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:23pmWe'll at a 50/50 chance, that's 2 goals tops.CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:15pmBad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pmIt cost us what?Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pmOur mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pmTrue, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.
Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.
Our mistakes are irrelevant.
It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
All decisions would of had us kicking from the goal line inexcusable the umpire ignored them. Just cheating
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6080
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1568 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Maybe only one poster from the goal line, 3 goals then.CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:36pmCQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:23pmWe'll at a 50/50 chance, that's 2 goals tops.CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:15pmBad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pmIt cost us what?Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pmOur mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pmTrue, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.
Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.
Our mistakes are irrelevant.
It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
All decisions would of had us kicking from the goal line inexcusable the umpire ignored them. Just cheating
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6080
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1568 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
If we get 50k more members, the umps might be able to advance King to the goal line for all his kicks. Then we'd be flush.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:39pmMaybe only one poster from the goal line, 3 goals then.CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:36pmCQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:23pmWe'll at a 50/50 chance, that's 2 goals tops.CURLY wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:15pmBad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pmIt cost us what?Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pmOur mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pmTrue, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.
Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.
Our mistakes are irrelevant.
It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
All decisions would of had us kicking from the goal line inexcusable the umpire ignored them. Just cheating
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8583
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 527 times
- Been thanked: 1532 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
- asiu
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10313
- Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
- Has thanked: 1327 times
- Been thanked: 932 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.
.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6339
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 263 times
- Been thanked: 1124 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 856
- Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
- Has thanked: 93 times
- Been thanked: 117 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Does Michael Christian do press conferences or answer questions from reporters etc... He needs to explain and respond to the blantant inconsistencies over the past week.
- Wayne42
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4911
- Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
- Has thanked: 619 times
- Been thanked: 558 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
And that's about how it panned out
The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1429
- Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
- Has thanked: 10 times
- Been thanked: 94 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
What a f#cken disgrace - but a hip and shoulder is not part and parcel of the game because it has the potential to cause injury ?happy feet wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:06pm https://www.smh.com.au/sport/afl/tigers ... 563uv.html
Cotchin’s head high tackle and sling to the ground ‘just a part of the game”. Michael Christian you are a joke.
2 sets of rules as highlighted UNBELIEVABLY by the AFL themselves when they tweeted to faun over Bolton giving the gall to Martin - which is against the rules for most teams
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6607
- Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
- Location: Here
- Has thanked: 1324 times
- Been thanked: 467 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
Can we appeal the result due to biased umpiring and cheating and ask for a rematch?
As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”
St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3122
- Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
- Has thanked: 9 times
- Been thanked: 70 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
So you’re saying that the poor decisions didn’t effect the game?CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pmIt cost us what?Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pmOur mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pmTrue, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.
Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.
Our mistakes are irrelevant.
It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
There’s no argument from me about what you’re saying regarding our chances. But that doesn’t mean the umpiring didn’t effect the outcome.
Richmond were good...we missed opportunities...but the umpires made poor calls, missed numerous frees and even screwed up the goal review which effected the outcome.
They allowed Richmond to step over the line without pulling them back, which gave them an advantage. Last week against the Lions they were pulled up on it, this week they got away with just about anything.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6080
- Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
- Has thanked: 337 times
- Been thanked: 1568 times
Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?
I'm saying umpiring is a part of the game, just like accurate kicking. One you have control over the other you don't.Leo.J wrote: ↑Sun 11 Oct 2020 1:10amSo you’re saying that the poor decisions didn’t effect the game?CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pmIt cost us what?Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pmOur mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.CQ SAINT wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pmTrue, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.Leo.J wrote: ↑Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.
Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.
Our mistakes are irrelevant.
It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
There’s no argument from me about what you’re saying regarding our chances. But that doesn’t mean the umpiring didn’t effect the outcome.
Richmond were good...we missed opportunities...but the umpires made poor calls, missed numerous frees and even screwed up the goal review which effected the outcome.
They allowed Richmond to step over the line without pulling them back, which gave them an advantage. Last week against the Lions they were pulled up on it, this week they got away with just about anything.
I'm very certain our wasteful set shot kicking had far more effect on the result than any decision made by those the umpires.
Again, not sure how we improve the umpiring but you know the rest.
No excuses.