Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

User avatar
Bowey Boy
Club Player
Posts: 1154
Joined: Mon 22 Aug 2005 7:15pm
Location: Animal Enclosure
Has thanked: 184 times
Been thanked: 93 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877190Post Bowey Boy »

Er no apparently.


"I think, 'You kick a footy mate, you kick a footy. It's not like you've got a cure for cancer. You kick a footy, stop thinking you are so special'." - Samantha Black
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30096
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1234 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877192Post saintsRrising »

Devilhead wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 1:27am
Lynch has no eyes for the ball firstly - this is very clear

Carless conduct - could easily go Intentional
High contact - elbow to head
Medium to High impact - head split open
Potential to cause Injury - High - though this is only used for Ben Long so will not be taken into account

Final deliberation - 1 to 2 weeks - depending on Impact grading

Just imagine what he would go for if he had of been driving his car ;)


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
suss
Club Player
Posts: 1928
Joined: Sun 22 May 2005 11:42pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 90 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877194Post suss »

saynta wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:10pm Fine only for the tigers coward.
I wonder whether Ben Long would’ve been given the same punishment? That’s Lynch’s fifth penalty this year.


User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8393
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877197Post Devilhead »

Was Lynch hit on Paton even looked at?

Cotchin?


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6339
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1124 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877199Post Sainter_Dad »

suss wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:38pm
saynta wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:10pm Fine only for the tigers coward.
I wonder whether Ben Long would’ve been given the same punishment? That’s Lynch’s fifth penalty this year.
Second Only according to the MRP Statement:
Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Misconduct. The incident was classified as a $1250 sanction as a second offence. The player can accept a $750 sanction with an early plea.


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
happy feet
Club Player
Posts: 1834
Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877206Post happy feet »

What about that grub Cotchin?


Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9080 times
Been thanked: 3942 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877207Post saynta »

Sainter_Dad wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:48pm
suss wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:38pm
saynta wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:10pm Fine only for the tigers coward.
I wonder whether Ben Long would’ve been given the same punishment? That’s Lynch’s fifth penalty this year.
Second Only according to the MRP Statement:
Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Misconduct. The incident was classified as a $1250 sanction as a second offence. The player can accept a $750 sanction with an early plea.
That's just pure crap as he was cited three times in just two matches earlier in the season.


happy feet
Club Player
Posts: 1834
Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
Has thanked: 227 times
Been thanked: 348 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877208Post happy feet »

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/afl/tigers ... 563uv.html

Cotchin’s head high tackle and sling to the ground ‘just a part of the game”. Michael Christian you are a joke.


Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8393
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 1174 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877210Post Devilhead »

Wow so they didn't even look at Lynch's elbow to the back of Paton's head which split him open

Footage clearly shows he didn't have eyes on the ball and his arm was bent

Paton with blood flowing from his head has to go off for treatment

If that was Carlisle it would be minimum 2 weeks


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10457
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1329 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877211Post CURLY »

CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.

Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.

Our mistakes are irrelevant.
True, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.
Our mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.
It cost us what?

It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
Bad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6339
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1124 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877212Post Sainter_Dad »

saynta wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:05pm
Sainter_Dad wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:48pm
suss wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:38pm
saynta wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:10pm Fine only for the tigers coward.
I wonder whether Ben Long would’ve been given the same punishment? That’s Lynch’s fifth penalty this year.
Second Only according to the MRP Statement:
Based on the available evidence, the incident was assessed as Misconduct. The incident was classified as a $1250 sanction as a second offence. The player can accept a $750 sanction with an early plea.
That's just pure crap as he was cited three times in just two matches earlier in the season.
Ahh - Saynta my friend - you are technically correct - which is the best kind of correct.

Apparently - Misconduct is classified as different from striking.

"It is the fifth time this season that Lynch has attracted MRO attention for an incident.

He has had two fines for striking (Gold Coast's Sam Collins and Jarrod Witts), was fined for misconduct on Brisbane's Alex Witherden and was sent to the tribunal for a strike to Bomber Michael Hurley's neck."


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6080
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1568 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877214Post CQ SAINT »

CURLY wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:15pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.

Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.

Our mistakes are irrelevant.
True, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.
Our mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.
It cost us what?

It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
Bad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.
We'll at a 50/50 chance, that's 2 goals tops.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10781
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877215Post ace »

Review complete
Only Lynch gets $750 fine for putting his knee into Howard's neck.
$750 that's like a $75 fine to most people.
Flogged, flogged, flogged with feather.

Time to feed the Christian to the lions and bring an independent muslim.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10457
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1329 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877218Post CURLY »

CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:23pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:15pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.

Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.

Our mistakes are irrelevant.
True, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.
Our mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.
It cost us what?

It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
Bad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.
We'll at a 50/50 chance, that's 2 goals tops.

All decisions would of had us kicking from the goal line inexcusable the umpire ignored them. Just cheating


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6080
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1568 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877219Post CQ SAINT »

CURLY wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:36pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:23pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:15pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.

Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.

Our mistakes are irrelevant.
True, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.
Our mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.
It cost us what?

It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
Bad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.
We'll at a 50/50 chance, that's 2 goals tops.

All decisions would of had us kicking from the goal line inexcusable the umpire ignored them. Just cheating
Maybe only one poster from the goal line, 3 goals then.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6080
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1568 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877220Post CQ SAINT »

CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:39pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:36pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:23pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:15pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.

Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.

Our mistakes are irrelevant.
True, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.
Our mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.
It cost us what?

It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
Bad umpiring cost us 4 goals from the goal square. All four decisions were blatant and in full view of the umpires. The deliberately chose to cheat and not pay them.
We'll at a 50/50 chance, that's 2 goals tops.

All decisions would of had us kicking from the goal line inexcusable the umpire ignored them. Just cheating
Maybe only one poster from the goal line, 3 goals then.
If we get 50k more members, the umps might be able to advance King to the goal line for all his kicks. Then we'd be flush.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8583
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 527 times
Been thanked: 1532 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877221Post kosifantutti »



Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
asiu
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10313
Joined: Thu 08 Apr 2010 8:11pm
Has thanked: 1327 times
Been thanked: 932 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877224Post asiu »



Image
.name the ways , thought manipulates the State of Presence away.

.tipara waranta kani nina-tu.
User avatar
Sainter_Dad
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6339
Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
Has thanked: 263 times
Been thanked: 1124 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877233Post Sainter_Dad »

Image


“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”

― Aristophanes

If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
realdeal
Club Player
Posts: 856
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
Has thanked: 93 times
Been thanked: 117 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877237Post realdeal »

Does Michael Christian do press conferences or answer questions from reporters etc... He needs to explain and respond to the blantant inconsistencies over the past week.


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877242Post Wayne42 »

ace wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:38am
Wayne42 wrote: Fri 09 Oct 2020 10:26pm They'll have a look, and then move on
They'll have a look, have a good laugh at St Kilda's expense, and then move on
And that's about how it panned out


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
saint6709
Club Player
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue 22 Sep 2009 8:23am
Has thanked: 10 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877280Post saint6709 »

happy feet wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 6:06pm https://www.smh.com.au/sport/afl/tigers ... 563uv.html

Cotchin’s head high tackle and sling to the ground ‘just a part of the game”. Michael Christian you are a joke.
What a f#cken disgrace - but a hip and shoulder is not part and parcel of the game because it has the potential to cause injury ?
2 sets of rules as highlighted UNBELIEVABLY by the AFL themselves when they tweeted to faun over Bolton giving the gall to Martin - which is against the rules for most teams


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6607
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1324 times
Been thanked: 467 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877303Post Jacks Back »

Can we appeal the result due to biased umpiring and cheating and ask for a rematch?


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Leo.J
SS Life Member
Posts: 3122
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2005 8:29pm
Has thanked: 9 times
Been thanked: 70 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877317Post Leo.J »

CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.

Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.

Our mistakes are irrelevant.
True, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.
Our mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.
It cost us what?

It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
So you’re saying that the poor decisions didn’t effect the game?

There’s no argument from me about what you’re saying regarding our chances. But that doesn’t mean the umpiring didn’t effect the outcome.

Richmond were good...we missed opportunities...but the umpires made poor calls, missed numerous frees and even screwed up the goal review which effected the outcome.

They allowed Richmond to step over the line without pulling them back, which gave them an advantage. Last week against the Lions they were pulled up on it, this week they got away with just about anything.


CQ SAINT
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6080
Joined: Sat 12 Sep 2015 1:03pm
Has thanked: 337 times
Been thanked: 1568 times

Re: Will AFL review Cotchin, Lynch and 3rd umpire?

Post: # 1877318Post CQ SAINT »

Leo.J wrote: Sun 11 Oct 2020 1:10am
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:33pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:23pm
CQ SAINT wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 5:18pm
Leo.J wrote: Sat 10 Oct 2020 9:28am The umpires had a very bad night, missed a lot of frees more than usual...and it definitely helped one team more than the other.

Richmond play on the edge, they went over the line a lot last night. It’s the umpires responsibility to keep the game within the rules, they failed, and it cost us.

Our mistakes are irrelevant.
True, except for the 5 easy goals we missed.
Our mistakes don’t make the bad umpiring exceptable.
It cost us what?

It only cost us because Richmond made the most of their scoring opportunities when it counted and we didn't. That is what cost us. Umpiring is rarely good.
So you’re saying that the poor decisions didn’t effect the game?

There’s no argument from me about what you’re saying regarding our chances. But that doesn’t mean the umpiring didn’t effect the outcome.

Richmond were good...we missed opportunities...but the umpires made poor calls, missed numerous frees and even screwed up the goal review which effected the outcome.

They allowed Richmond to step over the line without pulling them back, which gave them an advantage. Last week against the Lions they were pulled up on it, this week they got away with just about anything.
I'm saying umpiring is a part of the game, just like accurate kicking. One you have control over the other you don't.
I'm very certain our wasteful set shot kicking had far more effect on the result than any decision made by those the umpires.
Again, not sure how we improve the umpiring but you know the rest.
No excuses.


Post Reply