Mach thread: saints v bombers

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18471
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1795 times
Been thanked: 813 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961021Post bigcarl »

Was it last year this mob beat us by 100 points?


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961025Post Wayne42 »

Kudos to Ratts, he said everyone keeps talking about a tough draw, he said every game is tough and if we play like that well we won't win.

Moved on to talk about mental health as that's what Spuds game is about.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22917
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1704 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961028Post Teflon »

Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:20am ratts said he and his coaching group didn't see it coming, he should have read a couple of the threads on here that predicted we would lose.
You are joking - didn’t see it coming??? rubbish couldn’t have said that surely..
If so resign Brett
Last edited by Teflon on Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:26am, edited 1 time in total.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8166
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 129 times
Been thanked: 1136 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961029Post Devilhead »

Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:20am ratts said he and his coaching group didn't see it coming, he should have read a couple of the threads on here that predicted we would lose.
So they got ahead of themselves ...... seriously fk me


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22917
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1704 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961031Post Teflon »

Devilhead wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:26am
Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:20am ratts said he and his coaching group didn't see it coming, he should have read a couple of the threads on here that predicted we would lose.
So they got ahead of themselves ...... seriously fk me
Wow
Got ahead of themselves cause Brisbane missed all those gettable goals in last weeks loss????
What’s there to get ahead of FFS
This is amateur hour


“Yeah….nah””
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22917
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1704 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961032Post Teflon »

Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:25am Kudos to Ratts, he said everyone keeps talking about a tough draw, he said every game is tough and if we play like that well we won't win.

Moved on to talk about mental health as that's what Spuds game is about.
Do not mention Spud after that mentally inept performance


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961034Post Wayne42 »

Teflon wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:29am
Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:25am Kudos to Ratts, he said everyone keeps talking about a tough draw, he said every game is tough and if we play like that well we won't win.

Moved on to talk about mental health as that's what Spuds game is about.
Do not mention Spud after that mentally inept performance
Well he did, and he was quite sincere when he did it.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
1965 Saint
Club Player
Posts: 386
Joined: Wed 16 Sep 2009 2:31am
Location: Perth
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 74 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961035Post 1965 Saint »

Many seem to want Clarkson as coach. If he took over I suggest the following players that played tonight would never play again for SK:
Hill
Webster
Ross
Jones
Howard

The following would be told to get your sh. t together quickly or get lost:
Paton
Gresham
Butler
Billings
Marshall
Crouch
Butler

Ones that would be cosseted and encouraged:

Higgins
NWM
Clark

Another thing. We got done over by Port using their sub inappropriately (obviously the AFL doesn’t care). How the f…k did Windhager get left on the bench? Why wouldn’t you take the non-performing squib off and inject some passion. I’m a poofteenth from writing Ratten off.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22917
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1704 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961042Post Teflon »

Why hasn’t this team played 1 full 4 quarter gane of football this year ????????
We’ll coached sides don’t get by winning off a quarter here and there ….against good sides u get found found out


“Yeah….nah””
1971
Club Player
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2021 7:37pm
Location: Trentham
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 73 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961043Post 1971 »

Too small again and not hard enough. I don't believe the players in the main are soft they are just not hard enough - not like say McKenzie or Wilkie. Spuds game is now ironic.


1971
Club Player
Posts: 229
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2021 7:37pm
Location: Trentham
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 73 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961044Post 1971 »

Too small again and not hard enough. I don't believe the players in the main are soft they are just not hard enough - not like say McKenzie or Wilkie. Spuds game is now ironic.


bangaulegend
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2490
Joined: Mon 19 Mar 2012 8:54pm
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 546 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961050Post bangaulegend »

Wayne42 wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 12:25am Kudos to Ratts, he said everyone keeps talking about a tough draw, he said every game is tough and if we play like that well we won't win.

Moved on to talk about mental health as that's what Spuds game is about.
I'm seriously starting to doubt if Ratten is the man to lead us to the Holy Grail .IMO I would put contract arrangements on hold till the end of the season .


Yallingupsaints
Club Player
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961079Post Yallingupsaints »

Don’t blame the puppet in the stands for pulling the wrong strings. The game was lost between the ears of the pussys on thd ground.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22917
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1704 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961081Post Teflon »

Yallingupsaints wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 1:04am Don’t blame the puppet in the stands for pulling the wrong strings. The game was lost between the ears of the pussys on thd ground.
Not 1 4 quarter performance this year
Puppet in stands not up to it
Pussys onfield need to be turned over


“Yeah….nah””
Yallingupsaints
Club Player
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961087Post Yallingupsaints »

Sounds like you need to support another club 🤪


Yallingupsaints
Club Player
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961088Post Yallingupsaints »

Sounds like you need to support another club 🤪


freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2036
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 213 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961089Post freely »

Do the puppets pull the strings? How do they do that?!


saintkev
Club Player
Posts: 426
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 1:42am
Has thanked: 683 times
Been thanked: 73 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961091Post saintkev »

SaintJohno wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:37pm If Ratts isn't able to inspire these guys for a really emotional game, is he really the guy that's going to get a premiership out of them?
Good question. He appears to accept mediocrity from favoured players and drops those not in the loop.


Yallingupsaints
Club Player
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961092Post Yallingupsaints »

Figuritively speaking


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961094Post Wayne42 »

Yallingupsaints wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 1:14am Sounds like you need to support another club 🤪
You can say that again.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22917
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1704 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961096Post Teflon »

Yallingupsaints wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 1:14am Sounds like you need to support another club 🤪
Sounds like you love mediocrity :roll:
1 Flagg in over 100 years and your happy?
Righto..


“Yeah….nah””
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22917
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 721 times
Been thanked: 1704 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961097Post Teflon »

freely wrote: Sat 18 Jun 2022 1:19am Do the puppets pull the strings? How do they do that?!
Somethings being pulled….not sure it string


“Yeah….nah””
Yallingupsaints
Club Player
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961099Post Yallingupsaints »

Not a sick measuring comp. I haven’t seen one in my lifetime so I don’t like mediocrity


Yallingupsaints
Club Player
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat 21 Jul 2018 12:13am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961100Post Yallingupsaints »

Dick..


realdeal
Club Player
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: Mach thread: saints v bombers

Post: # 1961104Post realdeal »

BadRossco wrote: Fri 17 Jun 2022 11:55pm A lot of posters appear to be putting the failure down to Ratts but in his defence he has not been dealt a very good hand with very few natural footballers out there.
Stop picking them in the team then..

And even non natural players can show some heart and intensity. Those players should be ashamed of themselves.


Post Reply