GWS v Sandy

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22571
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8531 times
Been thanked: 3757 times

GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009608Post saynta »

1/3 time.

Sandy 4.4 28 to GWS 2.4. 16

GWS kicked last two goals.

Bytel 12 possessions.

Guess either Paton or Cooper will be the sub.


User avatar
shanegrambeau
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5958
Joined: Thu 25 Jan 2018 2:15pm
Has thanked: 327 times
Been thanked: 710 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009609Post shanegrambeau »

Something I’m wondering about. Do players like Windy and Bytes appear to be playing a different role at VFL level? I mean, do they seem to have more license down there?

Always remember Stevie Baker saying that if he wanted to play AFL in the first’s regularly, he’d have to severely curtail his repertoire of tricks and focus on being one thing, basically a pest.


You're quite brilliant Shane, yeah..terrific!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22571
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8531 times
Been thanked: 3757 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009611Post saynta »

Sandy 2 points down at half time

5.4 to 5.4

They were kicking into a strong breeze. Hope our coach is taking note.

Bytel leading Sandy possession winner with 21 . Tyson not far behind.

Highmore and Bytel too good at this level but Windy is struggling.

Owens brother is not bad.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8411
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 578 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009614Post Otiman »

Saints listed players other than Bytel and Highmore not getting much of it.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22571
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8531 times
Been thanked: 3757 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009615Post saynta »

Otiman wrote: Sun 21 May 2023 3:23pm Saints listed players other than Bytel and Highmore not getting much of it.
I wouldn't say that. Campbell and Connolly doing OK and Billings slowly getting into it.


User avatar
Simon Templar
Club Player
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:57pm
Location: Middura
Has thanked: 333 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009618Post Simon Templar »

Saints players, apart from Bytel and Campbell, appear to be treading water….skills-wise


Go you good things....!!!
User avatar
Simon Templar
Club Player
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:57pm
Location: Middura
Has thanked: 333 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009619Post Simon Templar »

Saints players, apart from Bytel and Campbell, appear to be treading water….skills-wise


Go you good things....!!!
User avatar
Simon Templar
Club Player
Posts: 203
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 11:57pm
Location: Middura
Has thanked: 333 times
Been thanked: 12 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009620Post Simon Templar »

Saints players, apart from Bytel and Campbell, appear to be treading water….skills-wise


Go you good things....!!!
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22571
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8531 times
Been thanked: 3757 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009628Post saynta »

27 point loss.


on the outer
Club Player
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 9:50am
Location: Level 3
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009633Post on the outer »

Probably 3 or 4 players ready to go if we have injuries or form loss in the right areas Bytel, Highmore, windhager and Campbell a couple of others Connolly and Peris part of the way there. Big concern in key position back ups though Adams, Van Es, Keebler and Heath not showing enough and you could probably add Cordy to that group as well. Only hope with the first four is their still young and could come good eventually.


on the outer
Club Player
Posts: 194
Joined: Tue 20 Sep 2011 9:50am
Location: Level 3
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 23 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009634Post on the outer »

Probably 3 or 4 players ready to go if we have injuries or form loss in the right areas Bytel, Highmore, windhager and Campbell a couple of others Connolly and Peris part of the way there. Big concern in key position back ups though Adams, Van Es, Keebler and Heath not showing enough and you could probably add Cordy to that group as well. Only hope with the first four is their still young and could come good eventually.


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 721
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 285 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009949Post Killa »

Thought both Adams and Heath showed a bit in difficult conditions especially for bigger players

With the injuries there are just too many sub standard VFL players needing to be played to fill a team

The focus is on individual players and their recovery/development


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8411
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 174 times
Been thanked: 578 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2009954Post Otiman »

Killa wrote: Sun 21 May 2023 9:00pm Thought both Adams and Heath showed a bit in difficult conditions especially for bigger players
Good to hear.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16573
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3457 times
Been thanked: 2723 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2010010Post skeptic »

Did Billings play?


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11198
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2457 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2010038Post B.M »

Billings played

Had 24

Was serviceable


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18471
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1795 times
Been thanked: 813 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2010059Post bigcarl »

saynta wrote: Sun 21 May 2023 3:09pm Owens brother is not bad.
Older brother yes?


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11198
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2457 times

Re: GWS v Sandy

Post: # 2010061Post B.M »

I thought younger??

Kai is older - at Frankston


Post Reply