David King say…

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Borat
Club Player
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006 10:16pm
Location: Kazakhstan
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 31 times

David King say…

Post: # 2016531Post Borat »

Jagshemash! Man who look like Flattop in Dick Tracy movie film say we need to make tough call for chance of great success. He suggest Rowan Marshall trade at end of season in return for more strapping young lad prospect to be champion footyball player of future.

https://www.sen.com.au/news/2023/06/26/ ... tid=Zxz2cZ


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4485
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1263 times
Been thanked: 1295 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016532Post Yorkeys »

David King is shorter and far plumper than Nick Daicos. See on ground interview. David loves Nick. Many commentators do.
David has an unhealthy pallor, worse than normal Melbournian.
Why is anything he says given credibility. Because he knows Adam Simpson well?
It would be a joke if the guy had a sense of humour.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8279
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016536Post Otiman »

Anyone is up for trade, for the right price.

Would take a first rounder or two.

But only if we don't pay overs for TDK.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11020
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2418 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016545Post B.M »

Don’t trade good players to get better

It’s a model that doesn’t work - we’ve tried it before!

How’s this for a plan

Get rid of players not up to it, add first and second round draft picks - like Phillipou and NWM


Sebastian Tombs
Club Player
Posts: 190
Joined: Tue 15 Mar 2022 1:20pm
Has thanked: 103 times
Been thanked: 31 times
Contact:

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016550Post Sebastian Tombs »

David King seems to have never moved on from the 97 Prelim final


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13188
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1282 times
Been thanked: 1961 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016551Post The_Dud »

The idea has merit


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
StPeter
Club Player
Posts: 1218
Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
Location: StKilda East
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 216 times
Contact:

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016555Post StPeter »

Absolute rubbish.

Marshall is amongst our top 3 players and arguably our most important.

I would like to see Campbell tried in the team and Marshall given more time up forward.

Campbell may not be in the Ryder class but he is a better tap ruckman than Marshall.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11020
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2418 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016562Post B.M »

Why would you move Marshall from a position where he excels

To a position he is basically hopeless

That 3 year stint with Ryder was like the Gawn/Grundy situation now and was bad list management

Ryder was a good ruckman, and a good player - that we didn’t need


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8279
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016565Post Otiman »

B.M wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 8:45pm Ryder was a good ruckman, and a good player - that we didn’t need
The Bulldogs in 2020 thought otherwise (the 'we didn't need' bit).


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1664 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016566Post Teflon »

B.M wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 7:12pm Don’t trade good players to get better

It’s a model that doesn’t work - we’ve tried it before!

How’s this for a plan

Get rid of players not up to it, add first and second round draft picks - like Phillipou and NWM
That sounds wonderful
Keep all your good players
Trade our rubbish
In return other AFL clubs will gift you 1st and 2nd round DPs???
Why has NO ONE thought of this before????


“Yeah….nah””
B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11020
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2418 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016569Post B.M »

Why do we need other clubs draft picks?

Just need to nail your own

We will have 5 picks inside 50

Make room by getting rid of duds


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1664 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016570Post Teflon »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 7:43pm The idea has merit
It’s all predicated on:
1. When you think you’ll challenge and if that’s not for another 2 years …
2. Trading quality you think you can replace/cover from a certain position in that timeframe..

The idea of stockpiling additional top picks on our current ones has appeal ….question is….IF we did this and loaded up on A+ midfield talent plus maybe another gun tall defender?? Could we get by with a solid ruckman only after trading Marshall??…OR do you get the gun kid mids/tall defender in then go FA for a mature ruck from elsewhere to give you 2-3 years while your kids peak hoping Heath still comes on???

I’m not sure but it certainly feels like it’s sliding doors time for our club - get this wrong and we stay mid range side for a lot longer…be bold …get it right …in 2 years we are a legitimate, sustainable option for top 4 (sustainable because our top draft talent will be on the up with years left..)


“Yeah….nah””
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1664 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016571Post Teflon »

B.M wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 9:19pm Why do we need other clubs draft picks?

Just need to nail your own

We will have 5 picks inside 50

Make room by getting rid of duds
As he states the aim isn’t to just draft in line with other clubs who will also draft but to ramp up how much talent you can bring in now to give you an advantage
You won’t do that 1 first round each year
We got lucky with Owens etc
I’m not sure we will every year


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8279
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016573Post Otiman »

If we were offered Pick 9 & Pick 25 for Marshall.

Would you take it?

I would.

Marshall has 3-4 years left in him. You'd get 1 if not 2 200 gamers out of it.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1664 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016575Post Teflon »

Otiman wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 9:24pm If we were offered Pick 9 & Pick 25 for Marshall.

Would you take it?

I would.

Marshall has 3-4 years left in him. You'd get 1 if not 2 200 gamers out of it.
And THAT is the exact point
Plus could we cover what we get from Marshall with a mature ruck from elsewhere?
I’m not sure paying TDK top $ and draft pick gives the side enough of a boost
A top 10 pick in the quality of Pou plus another at 25…has appeal
Fascinating time …risky …but right now we know incremental improvement is probably not gonna get it done
You also need to ensure you give the 23-26yr bracket a decent chance to challenge so you the longer you wait..


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8279
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016576Post Otiman »

Teflon wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 9:21pm I’m not sure but it certainly feels like it’s sliding doors time for our club - get this wrong and we stay mid range side for a lot longer…be bold …get it right …in 2 years we are a legitimate, sustainable option for top 4 (sustainable because our top draft talent will be on the up with years left..)
You are spot on with this one.

Need to back our current side in, or go hard and trade out some talent for a short term rebuild.

There's no inbetween, unless we want to finish 6th to 12th for the next 10 years.

Unfortunately I don't have the read on the crystal ball for this one.

What I can tell you all is that you don't want to lose the winning culture. So tanking for the sake of picks aint on. You do what you need to do with the list, but try to win every game.


realdeal
Club Player
Posts: 843
Joined: Tue 30 Mar 2004 5:44pm
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 115 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016579Post realdeal »

He's 28 this year, as much as id hate to lose him, if a club offered three 1st rd picks then you'd have to take it.

Its not the same as trading 21yo McEvoy.. and it would give us good draft picks before the Tassy team starts hoarding them all.


Allowing Gresh to leave is a given, but really, id happily hold on to Ro unless its an offer to good to refuse.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13188
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1282 times
Been thanked: 1961 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016582Post The_Dud »

Is he a very good player, yep. A lot of teams would love him as icing on the cake.

Is he a good number 1 ruckman?

He’s not great at ruck contested, not great resting forward, not dominant in the air around the ground.

He needs to be 10cm taller or shorter, he’s stuck in no man’s land for me. He’s like an oversized mid.

We need a dominant ruckman to take the next step.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
nostalgicsaint
Club Player
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon 20 Jan 2020 7:38am
Has thanked: 54 times
Been thanked: 240 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016587Post nostalgicsaint »

Otiman wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 9:24pm If we were offered Pick 9 & Pick 25 for Marshall.

Would you take it?

I would.

Marshall has 3-4 years left in him. You'd get 1 if not 2 200 gamers out of it.
This would be very tempting. Would probably want some late round pick upgrades as well.

Particularly as this draft is meant to be a very good one.

The idea has a lot of merit- Particularly if we did pick up TDK.

Heath will be raw but capable next year.


Disclaimer: posts are my views and shouldn't be taken as fact, even if I am in fact right.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1664 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016589Post Teflon »

The_Dud wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 9:47pm Is he a very good player, yep. A lot of teams would love him as icing on the cake.

Is he a good number 1 ruckman?

He’s not great at ruck contested, not great resting forward, not dominant in the air around the ground.

He needs to be 10cm taller or shorter, he’s stuck in no man’s land for me. He’s like an oversized mid.

We need a dominant ruckman to take the next step.
Yeah it’s interesting gee he’s a good utility
But ruck?
Some on BF think his tap work would improve drastically if he had better mids reading him…
I don’t agree
I watched the same set of mids look superb while Ryder was feeding them…even tap out backwards to a roving Gresham made him look superb…
Marshall doesn’t do that
I would still not give top pick for TDK - has proven very little ruck wise imo
Some also suggesting this is why we are crazy not offering Parish a huge deal
He’s no 1 clearance mid in the comp gets his own ball but can spread as well and only costs $$ ….5x$1m ?? Gotta go big to offset Cats etc
Then take picks to draft …. top up more talent …
We had money for DeGoey
Next year Hill Howard’s etc out if contract so further savings available
Last edited by Teflon on Mon 26 Jun 2023 10:42pm, edited 1 time in total.


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18493
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1516 times
Been thanked: 1869 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016590Post SaintPav »

I would have thought Marshall was the last player we could afford to lose especially for a late first round draft pick which is what he’s worth.

Goddard
McEvoy
Dal Santo

Didn’t work then, it’s not going to work now.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1664 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016591Post Teflon »

SaintPav wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 10:41pm I would have thought Marshall was the last player we could afford to lose especially for a late first round draft pick which is what he’s worth.

Goddard
McEvoy
Dal Santo

Didn’t work then, it’s not going to work now.
Not comparable
Not even same footy dept


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
Borat
Club Player
Posts: 123
Joined: Sat 11 Mar 2006 10:16pm
Location: Kazakhstan
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 31 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016594Post Borat »

Sebastian Tombs wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 7:32pm David King seems to have never moved on from the 97 Prelim final
Yes, is true. He still have how you say sore anus from that year :mrgreen:


Banger9798
SS Life Member
Posts: 2661
Joined: Sun 25 Apr 2021 9:43pm
Has thanked: 679 times
Been thanked: 754 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016598Post Banger9798 »

Insane idea


The Artist formerly known as Fugazi
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18493
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1516 times
Been thanked: 1869 times

Re: David King say…

Post: # 2016601Post SaintPav »

Teflon wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 10:44pm
SaintPav wrote: Mon 26 Jun 2023 10:41pm I would have thought Marshall was the last player we could afford to lose especially for a late first round draft pick which is what he’s worth.

Goddard
McEvoy
Dal Santo

Didn’t work then, it’s not going to work now.
Not comparable
Not even same footy dept
Reported for magical thinking and continuing to commit the fallacy of the messiah hire, ad nauseam!


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Post Reply