Is this first time we have no retiree?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
WheelersSaint
Posts: 6
Joined: Sun 12 Jul 2020 9:10pm

Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2027187Post WheelersSaint »

Every year the list gets refreshed which means we have a few who parts way.

Do we have any potential retiree this year or will be only forced clean up?


darylcowie
Club Player
Posts: 530
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 5:20pm
Location: donvale
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 64 times
Contact:

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2027858Post darylcowie »

Campbell for sure, due to his age and lack of flexibility.
Maybe McKenzie and Jones to, due to injuries that they can't seem to get over.


its time to make a name for yourself like you've never made before!
User avatar
D.B.Cooper
Club Player
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 665 times
Been thanked: 625 times

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2027862Post D.B.Cooper »

Saintmike suggested Webster may retire.


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2027866Post Ghost Like »

D.B.Cooper wrote: Sat 26 Aug 2023 1:28pm Saintmike suggested Webster may retire.
That seemed an odd call. Seems an odd call.


Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2028454Post Trev from the Bush »

D.B.Cooper wrote: Sat 26 Aug 2023 1:28pm Saintmike suggested Webster may retire.
Well that would be plain silly, wouldn't it. Unless he is suffering from a career-ending injury, which means he wouldn't be playing now.


Saint supporter since '62
User avatar
n1ck
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9869
Joined: Sun 08 Aug 2004 2:28am
Location: Clarinda
Has thanked: 77 times
Been thanked: 82 times

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2028491Post n1ck »

Still time. Zak Jones would have to consider it. Dan McKenzie would have to consider it. But retirements or not, there are going to be some list changes. Maybe not wholesale burnoff but a few will be let go into the wind.


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4488
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1266 times
Been thanked: 1296 times

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2028505Post Yorkeys »

SydneySainter?
SunnyErnie?


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6103
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 815 times
Been thanked: 958 times

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2028506Post Vortex »

n1ck wrote: Mon 28 Aug 2023 11:32am
wholesale burnoff
Hey Mr Magic we have another contender for describing “Mass Exodus”.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16538
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3447 times
Been thanked: 2703 times

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2028509Post skeptic »

It actually wouldn’t surprise if Campbell stays

Seems very well liked by the coaching group, performing well at Sandy and by all accounts is a good leader/mentor down there.
He might actually be a classic, proper depth player and leader of the club that is primarily suited to level below AFL


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8284
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 551 times

Re: Is this first time we have no retiree?

Post: # 2028524Post Otiman »

skeptic wrote: Mon 28 Aug 2023 2:23pm It actually wouldn’t surprise if Campbell stays

Seems very well liked by the coaching group, performing well at Sandy and by all accounts is a good leader/mentor down there.
He might actually be a classic, proper depth player and leader of the club that is primarily suited to level below AFL
Coaches outside of the soft cap on the playing list - it will be the next thing.

They'll also try and sell it as "veteran supplementary list" like they did a while back with the rookie list.


Post Reply