Concussion re a high flying mark
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Fri 07 May 2010 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 290 times
Concussion re a high flying mark
Where you fly for a mark and inadvertently knee some one in the back of head ...great mark or a free kick to the player under the hit who copped one high ...you don't want to take high flying out of the game but if you smash some one in the head whilst doing it it has to be a free kick to the guy who copped it ..otherwise it's all ridiculous re t he current rule with concussion.
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 241 times
- Been thanked: 1050 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
Ruling is easy
A concussion is suffered:
Was there another course of action you could have taken?
- No - Play on - nothing to see here (high marks, properly executed tackles, rucking duels etc)
- Yeas - Face weeks (bumps, sling tackles, charges etc)
A concussion is suffered:
Was there another course of action you could have taken?
- No - Play on - nothing to see here (high marks, properly executed tackles, rucking duels etc)
- Yeas - Face weeks (bumps, sling tackles, charges etc)
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6198
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 820 times
- Been thanked: 967 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
The OP is talking about the elephant in the room.
MCartin
Brayshaw
Murphy ( will mostly like be retired by the AFL also).
All these players suffered nearly all of their concussions from legal acts.
But the AFL have deflected attention away from the elephant and diverted our small attention spans by brainwashing us into placing responsibility onto the players and their very infrequent illegal acts that cause concussions.
Absolutely flying for a contested mark will become illegal at some stage, but possibly players backing back into oncoming traffic has to be outlawed an/or removed from the game with rule modifications long before the contested mark.
MCartin
Brayshaw
Murphy ( will mostly like be retired by the AFL also).
All these players suffered nearly all of their concussions from legal acts.
But the AFL have deflected attention away from the elephant and diverted our small attention spans by brainwashing us into placing responsibility onto the players and their very infrequent illegal acts that cause concussions.
Absolutely flying for a contested mark will become illegal at some stage, but possibly players backing back into oncoming traffic has to be outlawed an/or removed from the game with rule modifications long before the contested mark.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1137
- Joined: Fri 07 May 2010 3:00pm
- Has thanked: 194 times
- Been thanked: 290 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
Knee in the back of the head if you took a sreamer ..free kick to the opposition ..accumulate knocks will have an impact. ..frees will be given against the high flyer in the future no doubt.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6198
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 820 times
- Been thanked: 967 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
Will the people rioting in the streets be the same self righteous brainwashed hypocrits calling for Jimmy to be nailed to a cross? At the surface of their virtue signalling they seemed only int6erest in removing concussions from the game at all cost. Or are you suggesting there are certain concussions that are acceptable?
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10719
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3332 times
- Been thanked: 2305 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
So ...the 'purists' are saying our boys should just dish it out at every opportunity. Right?
Tackle hard. Smash heads when attempting to win the footy (jumping in the air is justified because Patrick Cripps won a Brownlow doing this) and knee people in the temple and in the head when going for speccys.
We need to practise these things more at training. We need to target 1 player each game and especially from our top 8 opponents. If one of the opposition players is not concussed at the end of each game, we have failed.
The more ruthless we are, the better our chances come finals time when we compete against these bastards.
Let's get a few more opposition guys retiring from the game.
That's what footy is all about
I only go to Bathurst to watch the car crashes
Tackle hard. Smash heads when attempting to win the footy (jumping in the air is justified because Patrick Cripps won a Brownlow doing this) and knee people in the temple and in the head when going for speccys.
We need to practise these things more at training. We need to target 1 player each game and especially from our top 8 opponents. If one of the opposition players is not concussed at the end of each game, we have failed.
The more ruthless we are, the better our chances come finals time when we compete against these bastards.
Let's get a few more opposition guys retiring from the game.
That's what footy is all about
I only go to Bathurst to watch the car crashes
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 328
- Joined: Thu 13 Oct 2022 4:42pm
- Has thanked: 56 times
- Been thanked: 26 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
If a high mark is taken and in the process the marker has kicked his opponent in the head then it should be a free kick against the marker. The head needs to be sacrosanct so if the marker deliberately kneed/kicked him in the head it should be a free kick against and automatic suspension. If the knee/kick to the head was accidental it should be just a free kick against and no suspension.Rubyjo wrote: ↑Mon 11 Mar 2024 8:44pm Where you fly for a mark and inadvertently knee some one in the back of head ...great mark or a free kick to the player under the hit who copped one high ...you don't want to take high flying out of the game but if you smash some one in the head whilst doing it it has to be a free kick to the guy who copped it ..otherwise it's all ridiculous re t he current rule with concussion.
NeXus Nick
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
![Shocked :shock:](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10719
- Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
- Has thanked: 3332 times
- Been thanked: 2305 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
Winning the footy is the essence of contact sports.
If your intent is to mark it and you fly high and execute, then any incidental contact to someone's head is secondary and inconsequential.
If you don't mark it and you were not a realistic chance to mark it, and at the same time you've caused an oppo player to be concussed...well you should be rubbed out imo.
If you intentionally kick someone in the kidneys while jumping up for a mark, that's a dog act, but it's still legal in our game.
I think that's how it should remain and if you have a player who has repeated behaviour that could be seen as endangering opposition players ( e.g. when Toby Greene had a habit of lifting his leg and foot towards opponents faces) then that's where the AFL exercises it's authority.
If your intent is to mark it and you fly high and execute, then any incidental contact to someone's head is secondary and inconsequential.
If you don't mark it and you were not a realistic chance to mark it, and at the same time you've caused an oppo player to be concussed...well you should be rubbed out imo.
If you intentionally kick someone in the kidneys while jumping up for a mark, that's a dog act, but it's still legal in our game.
I think that's how it should remain and if you have a player who has repeated behaviour that could be seen as endangering opposition players ( e.g. when Toby Greene had a habit of lifting his leg and foot towards opponents faces) then that's where the AFL exercises it's authority.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4553
- Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
- Has thanked: 1296 times
- Been thanked: 1308 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
See Grundy's tactics in Round 0 to jump with knee into Gawn's hip/kidney region.
All good according to umpires and commentators.
Gawn didn't look too good. Rematch may be interesting if umpire interpretations don't change in the meantime.
Duty of care is a catch all lip service when considering Maynard and McKay got nothing for doing terrible damage with intent.
All good according to umpires and commentators.
Gawn didn't look too good. Rematch may be interesting if umpire interpretations don't change in the meantime.
Duty of care is a catch all lip service when considering Maynard and McKay got nothing for doing terrible damage with intent.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6198
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 820 times
- Been thanked: 967 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
Would you want your kids playing the game?
That will always be the true test, when the numbers dip at grass roots, I believe that could come as more high profile players are forced out of the game and their stories spread of poor quality of life after leaving the game. And you'd have to guess the class actions against the AFL will only snowball.
More than likely Paddy Mc Cartin, Brayshaw and Murphy will end up suing.
That will always be the true test, when the numbers dip at grass roots, I believe that could come as more high profile players are forced out of the game and their stories spread of poor quality of life after leaving the game. And you'd have to guess the class actions against the AFL will only snowball.
More than likely Paddy Mc Cartin, Brayshaw and Murphy will end up suing.
- Ghost Like
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6562
- Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
- Has thanked: 5788 times
- Been thanked: 1909 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
I think the OP is a fair question. It always has been, however there will always be incidental and collision contact in a fair contest.
Conspiracy theories do not cut it, especially when some believed Covid doomed the AFL and they were to become broke.
Again, a person who chooses to take out soneone in the way Webster did does not deserve excuses or faux reasoning. Even Jimmy knows that. I suspect he's been told that by the Club, the coach & his team mates. He's let them all down.
This pseudo bravado is simply that, false.
Webster will become available, mid season, the concussion issue and its consequences will continue. Incidental contact happens in a contact sport. That cannot, nor should not be, mitagated against, they chose the sport.
Conspiracy theories do not cut it, especially when some believed Covid doomed the AFL and they were to become broke.
Again, a person who chooses to take out soneone in the way Webster did does not deserve excuses or faux reasoning. Even Jimmy knows that. I suspect he's been told that by the Club, the coach & his team mates. He's let them all down.
This pseudo bravado is simply that, false.
Webster will become available, mid season, the concussion issue and its consequences will continue. Incidental contact happens in a contact sport. That cannot, nor should not be, mitagated against, they chose the sport.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6198
- Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
- Has thanked: 820 times
- Been thanked: 967 times
- Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6105
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 241 times
- Been thanked: 1050 times
Re: Concussion re a high flying mark
Are you telling me the sun will rise tomorrow and that we will all go on with our lives?Ghost Like wrote: ↑Tue 12 Mar 2024 8:59pm I think the OP is a fair question. It always has been, however there will always be incidental and collision contact in a fair contest.
Conspiracy theories do not cut it, especially when some believed Covid doomed the AFL and they were to become broke.
Again, a person who chooses to take out soneone in the way Webster did does not deserve excuses or faux reasoning. Even Jimmy knows that. I suspect he's been told that by the Club, the coach & his team mates. He's let them all down.
This pseudo bravado is simply that, false.
Webster will become available, mid season, the concussion issue and its consequences will continue. Incidental contact happens in a contact sport. That cannot, nor should not be, mitagated against, they chose the sport.
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!