Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 2774
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 709 times
Been thanked: 367 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055405Post shrodes »

Otiman wrote: Fri 26 Apr 2024 11:31pm Hastie noted as injured on the AFL stats?
Saw a rumour he’s hurt his knee, hope that’s not true


wally
Club Player
Posts: 769
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055406Post wally »

I thought the umpire were shockingly inconsistent , it’s just that the 50/50 debatable frees Port seemed to get more paid their way.
I’d like to see the afl actually look at a full game and explain the holding the ball/ dropping the ball rule, I don’t think I’m that dumb but it’s got me buggared.


wally
Club Player
Posts: 769
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 8:23am
Location: brisy
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 100 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055407Post wally »

On Howard I think it’s a long way from one game at Sandy a couple of weeks ago to playingPA in Adelaide.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10660
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 797 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055420Post ace »

saintkid wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 12:20am Certainly was bizzare. The Garcia comment was very strange. Had no idea who was 25 and who was 10 apparently in the free kick count..yeah right.
Just my opinion and it stands out like a sore thumb of late but something just doesn't add up with him.
The AFL forbids coaches commenting on the quality of the umpiring.
That answer was Lyon's way of emphasising the disparity and bias of the umpiring.
He knew the stats and he knew that two bad umpiring decisions resulted in two Port Adelaide goals in the last quarter.
But he is not even allowed to mention them.

He knows he has to manage the manageables which is the players performance.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
Killa
Club Player
Posts: 649
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 270 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055425Post Killa »

Correct Ace

Then the reference to the draw and preparation

The compromised and corrupt AFL, dictated to as it is and feeding the incompetent media as it does, dictates that no employee or any employee of a member Club will question it or its operatives including umpires, umpires who, as we saw last night are just not up to the task, influenced by "name" players versus unknown kids and influenced by crowd noise from a feral audience

And the AFL requirement in regard publicity


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 649
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 270 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055427Post Killa »

Will the AFL, for the second week running, actually fess up that they delivered the result in a game?


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10660
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 797 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055432Post ace »

Killa wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 9:49am Will the AFL, for the second week running, actually fess up that they delivered the result in a game?
Only if the media forces them to.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
BringBackMadDog
Club Player
Posts: 1957
Joined: Thu 05 Aug 2004 9:29am
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 130 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055434Post BringBackMadDog »

B.M wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 12:12am Agreed

Defensive, called Garcia a second or third year player and was basically rambling

I honestly don’t think he GAF
Clearly he meant 2nd or 3rd game player. You’re just looking for reasons to call him out. And this bulls*** about him not giving a f* is just ridiculous


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18473
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1512 times
Been thanked: 1865 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055436Post SaintPav »

It was our second biggest loss of the year.

Incredible


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10660
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 797 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055439Post ace »

Otiman wrote: Fri 26 Apr 2024 11:31pm Hastie noted as injured on the AFL stats?
He came on at three quarter time but his stats show 19% time on ground.
That means he spend a quarter of the final term on the bench.
As the sub he should have spent the whole quarter on the ground.
Injury would account for the lost time.
The only other possibilities are disciplinary action or opponent beating him badly.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13161
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1282 times
Been thanked: 1956 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055440Post The_Dud »

Yorkeys wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 1:36am
B.M wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 12:18am The only people that think he is the messiah

Hopeful supporters and dumbarse media

I keep telling you

The coach is not the answer!!!! It’s good to have a decent one

But give me good players over a good coach anyday

People just want to believe it is to give them hope when a coach is sacked!
Have you not been paying attention.
Two years ago tonight's scenario would have been a 70 point shellacking.
The guys play for Ross. He proactively coaches.
Last week 10 goal drubbing. This week could have won in Adelaide v top 4 side. Same players as the week before.
Credit where due, eh.
Both games were similar, -10 in scoring shots, difference was last week the Dogs kicked straight and last night Port didn’t.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10660
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 29 times
Been thanked: 797 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055441Post ace »

ace wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 10:32am
Otiman wrote: Fri 26 Apr 2024 11:31pm Hastie noted as injured on the AFL stats?
He came on at three quarter time but his stats show 19% time on ground.
That means he spend a quarter of the final term on the bench.
As the sub he should have spent the whole quarter on the ground.
Injury would account for the lost time.
The only other possibilities are disciplinary action or pulled because opponent beating him badly.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
User avatar
saintkid
Club Player
Posts: 1734
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
Has thanked: 138 times
Been thanked: 294 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055444Post saintkid »

ace wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 9:23am
saintkid wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 12:20am Certainly was bizzare. The Garcia comment was very strange. Had no idea who was 25 and who was 10 apparently in the free kick count..yeah right.
Just my opinion and it stands out like a sore thumb of late but something just doesn't add up with him.
The AFL forbids coaches commenting on the quality of the umpiring.
That answer was Lyon's way of emphasising the disparity and bias of the umpiring.
He knew the stats and he knew that two bad umpiring decisions resulted in two Port Adelaide goals in the last quarter.
But he is not even allowed to mention them.

He knows he has to manage the manageables which is the players performance.
There's ways you can tackle that question Ace as other coaches have shown. His answer was insipid like some of his baffling selection decisions so far this year.


B.M
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10895
Joined: Thu 04 Jul 2019 8:53pm
Has thanked: 5 times
Been thanked: 2402 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055450Post B.M »

How do you measure a coaches performance?

Win/Loss?

Premierships?

Great coaches are nothing without quality players, whereas quality players can still dominate regardless of the coach!


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22522
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8465 times
Been thanked: 3733 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055457Post saynta »

meher baba wrote: Fri 26 Apr 2024 10:52pm Even I'm starting to believe the umpires are corrupt.
Of course they are.


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22522
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8465 times
Been thanked: 3733 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055458Post saynta »

The_Dud wrote: Fri 26 Apr 2024 11:40pm
B.M wrote: Fri 26 Apr 2024 11:35pm It’s 480 free kicks

Cancel Crows games it 4.8 per game more

That significant

Over such a long period- it should be neutral - level
It was both home teams combined, not just Port
B M is correct


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22522
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8465 times
Been thanked: 3733 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055459Post saynta »

saintkid wrote: Sat 27 Apr 2024 12:20am Certainly was bizzare. The Garcia comment was very strange. Had no idea who was 25 and who was 10 apparently in the free kick count..yeah right.
Just my opinion and it stands out like a sore thumb of late but something just doesn't add up with him.
Yeah it was bulls*** wasn't it. His later comment confirmed that he knew.


User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10332
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 182 times
Been thanked: 682 times

Re: Match Thread Saints v Port Round 7 2024

Post: # 2055465Post desertsaint »

look we all know the afl isn't a fair dinkum sporting body. it's a provider of entertainment. maximising revenue is its first concern, not ensuring a fair sports competition. And you maximise revenue, just as in other so called sports, like the wwf, by promoting those teams/characters that draw numbers. You give them the big games, the easy draw to assist in finals, the promotion, and you handicap the smaller teams, not necessarily deliberately, but by the fact they get accomodated around the bigger clubs' needs and the desire to increase revenue. the umps are quite aware of this. everyone bar blind freddy is. so of course there is a psychological impact on umpires to follow a story, even if only subconsciously. it delivered collingwood their fairytale flag last year. assisted by the umps in their final two games when fair umpiring would have seen them not even make the final.
that is the afl. if we support it then we accept it. however grudgingly. the reality is we follow a lower light character in this charade whose role is that of a loser. accept the script or find a different form of entertainment. occassionally the loser gets a chance of redemption. and we wait for that day.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Post Reply