Baker's case is underway - discussion

Iceman234 · Post: # 438641Post **Iceman234** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:10pm

Laughable yet believable

Dal_Santos_Gal · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:10pm

WHAT BULLSHTYE

we get screwed by the AFL every SINGLE time

RIX · Post: # 438644Post **RIX** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:10pm

F**(#*CKING BULLLLLLSHITTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT

Behind Play · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:10pm

Hope the club grows some balls and fights this all the way. This is garbage.

MC Gusto · Post: # 438647Post **MC Gusto** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:11pm

we will have to appeal

surely

Iceman234 · Post: # 438650Post **Iceman234** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:12pm

Do they make transcripts available?

Grimfang · Post: # 438652Post **Grimfang** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:12pm

F%&*ing BULLSHYTE!!!

No clearer indication that this is rigged. Freo witnesses evidence is all over the shop. Nixon backs Baker's version.

Somehow they come up with this rubbish.

Take it to the frigging courts, we get no justice from the AFL.

luke.l_26 · Post: # 438657Post **luke.l_26** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:14pm

so what happened?
They just took the trainers word for what it was, and completely disregarded anythign Baker said?

well.. I can't say I wasn't expecting it.. but yeah. it's pretty much a steaming pile of dung how this happens all the time to us.

Dal_Santos_Gal · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:14pm

why is it that the fremantle vision is taken as gospel and the saints vision of events is just completely over looked...

well that's how it appears.

I hope Jeff 'the thug farmer' is suffering REAL NASTY rotton headaches the scum bag low life piece of shtyeeeee.

Pwoit · Post: # 438661Post **Pwoit** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:15pm

Pwoit wrote: 1. Does he player for St Kilda
2. Did he wear a St Kilda jumper on the day

I knew it would go this way because of the above two lines

Absolute farce

Pure evidence of conspiracy against St Kilda

hAyES · Post: # 438662Post **hAyES** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:15pm

This is absolute bull****. So we go by hearsay now? Just get rid of all video evidence now, because all you need is hearsay. What a joke.

We better fight this.

Gilbert The Great · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:15pm

Tribunal is a joke

for example Baker last year 2 weeks for attempted strike at stafford, he couldn't even reach him. 2 weeks

Kerr hits Mitchel, i think? in the nuts and gets off

then today all the evidence supports Baker and he gets rubbed out

Farmer says he cant remember anything then give evidence later, can you really believe it

Freo runner was just pulling stuff from his arse

Nixon support baker

yet he still gets found guilty

THE TRIBUNAL IS AND ABSOLUTE JOKE

saintdooley · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:16pm

MC Euro Gusto wrote:we will have to appeal

surely

i wouldnt
this is a good chance for the boys to show us what they are made off!
i think the players are going to be reallllly pi$$ed off on friday night and let all their anger out on the wet coke neadles, and hopefully thrash them!

St. Luke · Post: # 438666Post **St. Luke** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:16pm

I can't believe it!!!!! Something out of friggin nothing!!!!! Why????

Oh When the Saints · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:17pm

Surely they have to appeal it.

To me it just doesn't make sense.

Let's take it all the way Saints ...

Have we heard what the penalty is yet?

Iceman234 · Post: # 438670Post **Iceman234** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:18pm

Oh When the Saints wrote:Surely they have to appeal it.

To me it just doesn't make sense.

Let's take it all the way Saints ...

Have we heard what the penalty is yet?

It'll be severe - he's carrying points.

Wish I could get a conviction this easy.......

sainter58 · Post: # 438671Post **sainter58** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:18pm

I CAN

It always happens to Stkilda because we have no balls when it comes to tribunals. We lose just about everyone that we go to.

I always thought NO EVIDENCE ....NO CASE

saintbart · Post: # 438672Post **saintbart** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:18pm

With an appeal, we have to prove that the process was flawed I beleive. I definitely think this one case that this comes under.

Also an appeal is heard by a seperate "independant" tribunal.

C'mon saints..this is one appeal that we CAN win. Lets show some balls and fight this, based on the dodgy process.

saintsRrising · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:18pm

So bakes has in the apst been found Guilty of Attempting to strike...

and now has been found Guilty of "We don't have clue, but he is suspended anyway...lets just call it rough play!!!"

luke.l_26 · Post: # 438675Post **luke.l_26** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:19pm

saintdooley wrote:
MC Euro Gusto wrote:we will have to appeal

surely
i wouldnt
this is a good chance for the boys to show us what they are made off!
i think the players are going to be reallllly pi$$ed off on friday night and let all their anger out on the wet coke neadles, and hopefully thrash them!

you're hearts in the right place dooley.
but does this really work?
I mean sure.. it could go our way and we win because of the fire...
but it coudl also backfire, and cause us to force more errors and turnovers etc.
If it works, It'll be great.
But I'd feel much more comfortable knowing that we could have Baker on simply because we KNOW he is innocent.
rather than having to play without bakes and just rely on the team to feel baker's pain of being wrongly accused...

super dooper · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:19pm

Gilbert The Great wrote:Tribunal is a joke

for example Baker last year 2 weeks for attempted strike at stafford, he couldn't even reach him. 2 weeks

Kerr hits Mitchel, i think? in the nuts and gets off

then today all the evidence supports Baker and he gets rubbed out

Farmer says he cant remember anything then give evidence later, can you really believe it

Freo runner was just pulling stuff from his arse

Nixon support baker

yet he still gets found guilty

THE TRIBUNAL IS AND ABSOLUTE JOKE

It boggles the mind doesnt it!!

Dal_Santos_Gal · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:19pm

Oh When the Saints wrote:Have we heard what the penalty is yet?

We are still waiting, its going to be at least a week because of his carry over points of 155, then we have what ever they add on. It could well be several weeks.
Honestly that wouldn't surprise me because the AFL have it in for the saints.

St. Luke · Post: # 438678Post **St. Luke** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:20pm

Where do we send our donations to get this to the supreme court?? Count me IN!

saintsRrising · Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:20pm

To appeal I think you have to bring up fresh evidence....

Which in this case means a St Kilda trainer with an onbscured view who saw nothing....

Worked for Freo

Sainterman · Post: # 438682Post **Sainterman** » Tue 21 Aug 2007 9:20pm

Who on here seriously didn't expect this to be the result??

Another poor piece of AFL management that was totally expected and predictable. Dimwit is seeing to the demise of this game...what qualifications does he posess to run the country's biggest sport? I am interested to know how he got the job. and for mine...the buck stops with him.

Tonight another bad joke.