The elephant in the room
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
The elephant in the room
Carlton, who are'nt really that good, were the better team on Friday night.
AND
The Dogs would beat us by 5 goals on current form.
Discuss...
AND
The Dogs would beat us by 5 goals on current form.
Discuss...
Saints are 12-0. The boys are in 'cruise control', managing the list perfectly, and they only put the hammer down when they have to.
You won't see The Saints best until the Finals.
Discuss...
You won't see The Saints best until the Finals.
Discuss...
Last edited by BakesFan on Sun 14 Jun 2009 8:01am, edited 2 times in total.
Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people.(Eleanor Roosevelt)
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10781
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 828 times
Carlton beaten by 9 points even with a bonus 6 points from an interchange goal.
If the score doesn't tell you anything then checkout the statistics.
Carlton had far fewer possessions and not one of their players reached 100 dream team points.
You clearly had too much to drink last night, go back to bed and sleep it off.
If the score doesn't tell you anything then checkout the statistics.
Carlton had far fewer possessions and not one of their players reached 100 dream team points.
You clearly had too much to drink last night, go back to bed and sleep it off.
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- ace
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 10781
- Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 31 times
- Been thanked: 828 times
Re: The elephant in the room
Thinline wrote:Carlton, who are'nt really that good, were the better team on Friday night.
Pllease correct your typo.
"better" should read "BEATEN"
The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.
If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
- kosifantutti23
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2388
- Joined: Fri 26 Sep 2008 12:55am
- Location: Horgen
Traditionally the better team is decided by multiplying the number of goals by six and adding the number of behinds.
The team with the biggest score wins.
We played the bulldogs six weeks ago. Our form was better on the night. We play them again in six weeks, our form will be different then and so will theirs.
The team with the biggest score wins.
We played the bulldogs six weeks ago. Our form was better on the night. We play them again in six weeks, our form will be different then and so will theirs.
Furtius Quo Rdelious
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
You are clearly coming down off a pill and spoiling for an argument.ace wrote:Carlton beaten by 9 points even with a bonus 6 points from an interchange goal.
If the score doesn't tell you anything then checkout the statistics.
Carlton had far fewer possessions and not one of their players reached 100 dream team points.
You clearly had too much to drink last night, go back to bed and sleep it off.
Discuss, I said. DISCUSS.
Not I reckon, I believe or I think...
FWIW I think Carlton's peformance all year has been overstated and Fri night was their zenith....and they got done...
The Dogs have had a few very soft wins since pushing Cats, but there's little doubt they'll present a much sterner challenge in a few week's time. Een so, if I were a Dogs fan I'd be wanting this streak to be Rd 15 onwards, not now...
- Cairnsman
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7377
- Joined: Thu 16 Jun 2005 10:38pm
- Location: Everywhere
- Has thanked: 189 times
- Been thanked: 276 times
Coming down off a pill. What do you mean coming down of a pill. I haven't heard this expression before, please explain.Thinline wrote:You are clearly coming down off a pill and spoiling for an argument.ace wrote:Carlton beaten by 9 points even with a bonus 6 points from an interchange goal.
If the score doesn't tell you anything then checkout the statistics.
Carlton had far fewer possessions and not one of their players reached 100 dream team points.
You clearly had too much to drink last night, go back to bed and sleep it off.
Discuss, I said. DISCUSS.
Not I reckon, I believe or I think...
FWIW I think Carlton's peformance all year has been overstated and Fri night was their zenith....and they got done...
The Dogs have had a few very soft wins since pushing Cats, but there's little doubt they'll present a much sterner challenge in a few week's time. Een so, if I were a Dogs fan I'd be wanting this streak to be Rd 15 onwards, not now...
- Hurricane
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4038
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:24pm
- Location: The isle of Besaid, Spira
Make no mistake about it Carlton are a good football side. Once they get some more experiance in their kids they will be a very good side. Carlton lost to St Kilda on Friday night that makes US the better team, if they played better than us they would have won.
"On current form this side would beat this side" I dont like that line of thinking. It makes no differance if they would beat us if we played this week (dont even count on that) because last time we met we beat them end of story. Next time they may beat us but we wont know that till we play each other again
BANG BANG
"On current form this side would beat this side" I dont like that line of thinking. It makes no differance if they would beat us if we played this week (dont even count on that) because last time we met we beat them end of story. Next time they may beat us but we wont know that till we play each other again
BANG BANG
Mitsuharu Misawa 1962 - 2009.
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
I am vengeance....I am the night...I....AM.....BATMAN
I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass and im all out of bubblegum
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
So...you hypothesise bulls*** but expect others to 'discuss'? Bit one sided isn't it? FWIW your statement directly above re: Carlton is right...Friday night was as good as it'll get for them, but they weren't good enough. Carlton were not the better team statistically (BTW, DT points don't amount to anything), with the exception of contested ball wins, and they were not the better team on the scoreboard.Thinline wrote:You are clearly coming down off a pill and spoiling for an argument.ace wrote:Carlton beaten by 9 points even with a bonus 6 points from an interchange goal.
If the score doesn't tell you anything then checkout the statistics.
Carlton had far fewer possessions and not one of their players reached 100 dream team points.
You clearly had too much to drink last night, go back to bed and sleep it off.
Discuss, I said. DISCUSS.
Not I reckon, I believe or I think...
FWIW I think Carlton's peformance all year has been overstated and Fri night was their zenith....and they got done...
The Dogs have had a few very soft wins since pushing Cats, but there's little doubt they'll present a much sterner challenge in a few week's time. Een so, if I were a Dogs fan I'd be wanting this streak to be Rd 15 onwards, not now...
As for us v the Dogs, who knows. Given our form (i.e. 12-0), you'd have to say we'd be red hot favourites.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4940
- Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
- Has thanked: 343 times
- Been thanked: 491 times
I came home from the game a bit flat, trying to figure out why we couldn't put them away. When I watched the replay I realised that the blues played bloody well, but still couldn't beat us! THe doggies are a good team, but so are we. We will no doubt drop a couple of games at some point. What our form is like entering week 1 of the finals interests me more, as we've already stitched up top 2, and the players have to know that.
Re: The elephant in the room
Thinline wrote:Carlton, who are'nt really that good, were the better team on Friday night.
AND
The Dogs would beat us by 5 goals on current form.
Discuss...
better team???...crap...were you there...did you even watch the game...... ...come on you can do better than that....
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
- Life Long Saint
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5533
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:54pm
- Has thanked: 62 times
- Been thanked: 483 times
- Contact:
Re: The elephant in the room
Can he??? I assume that you have proof!stinger wrote:come on you can do better than that....
the blues had more scoring shots. they won the contested possessions and the tackles, two things we pride ourselves on. i still don't exactly think they were the better team on the night, but i don't think the saints were either.ace wrote:If the score doesn't tell you anything then checkout the statistics.
Carlton had far fewer possessions and not one of their players reached 100 dream team points.
it was a really even match which we won thanks to some very good goalkicking. it was our third best exhibition of accuracy for the year. if we'd kicked the way we normally do, we would have lost. simple.
R1: 12.8 = 60%
R2: 15.11 = 58%
R3: 25.11 = 69%
R4: 17.9 = 65%
R5: 15.12 = 56%
R6: 14.20 = 41%
R7: 20.8 = 71%
R8: 13.12 = 52%
R9: 14.13 = 52%
R10: 11.17 = 39%
R11: 15.13 = 54%
R12: 16.8 = 67%
total: 187.142 = 57%
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6043
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 5:31pm
- Location: Currumbin, Quoinslairnd
Re: The elephant in the room
Stinger, Stinger, Stinger.... READ the orig post, mate.stinger wrote:Thinline wrote:Carlton, who are'nt really that good, were the better team on Friday night.
AND
The Dogs would beat us by 5 goals on current form.
Discuss...
better team???...crap...were you there...did you even watch the game...... ...come on you can do better than that....
I appreciate you'd be more likely to read it if it contained some sort of personal swipe, but quite plainly I raised the topics as a DISCUSSION.
Fact is if you stood around any water cooler at the office this morning, that is EXACTLY what would be on the agenda.
Are Carlton any good? If not, are Saints fading? And are the Dogs the form team at the moment?
Why so offended?
I'm curious as to what people think.
And of course I watched it. Fair dinkum. What kind of Sainter wouldn't?
I reckon the game could have gone either way, BTW. I also note they had an extra shot on goal than us, which is often a decent barometer (only one, granted). I think our class on demand (Montagna, Dal Santo goals cases in point) tipped us over the line.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9142
- Joined: Wed 29 Jun 2005 10:39pm
- Location: A distant beach
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 437 times
Re: The elephant in the room
The best team on the day never loses, and also the Dogs won't win a flag until they get a power key forward and defender.Thinline wrote:Carlton, who are'nt really that good, were the better team on Friday night.
AND
The Dogs would beat us by 5 goals on current form.
Discuss...
- Young Georgie
- Club Player
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007 5:11pm
- Location: Northern outpost
Carlton aren't that bad but were not the better team on the night and the Dogs on current form are still a side we match up well on and in all likelihood would beat.
Now we've got to put up with 2 weeks of useless negativity while our team sits on top of the ladder 12-0.
After the barrage of Blues hype after Friday where everyone in the media it seemed was banging on about how good they were and how lucky we were, it was great to hear John Ralph from the Hun on SEN this morning state that in actual fact St Kilda was a '6-8 goal better side' on the night (never one to exaggerate..) and Carlton bumbled and stumbled their way to numerous goals making the most of their opportunities and of their luck. He said St Kilda's structure was far superior with the difference was telling in the end.
Discusseded...let's move onwards and upwards
Now we've got to put up with 2 weeks of useless negativity while our team sits on top of the ladder 12-0.
After the barrage of Blues hype after Friday where everyone in the media it seemed was banging on about how good they were and how lucky we were, it was great to hear John Ralph from the Hun on SEN this morning state that in actual fact St Kilda was a '6-8 goal better side' on the night (never one to exaggerate..) and Carlton bumbled and stumbled their way to numerous goals making the most of their opportunities and of their luck. He said St Kilda's structure was far superior with the difference was telling in the end.
Discusseded...let's move onwards and upwards
Graceful, elusive, strong overhead and no Easybeat!
- degruch
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8948
- Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
- Location: Croydonia
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Post of the week...hopefully the fortnight! Well put YG.Young Georgie wrote:Carlton aren't that bad but were not the better team on the night and the Dogs on current form are still a side we match...St Kilda's structure was far superior with the difference was telling in the end. Discusseded...let's move onwards and upwards
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2508
- Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 9:11pm
- Location: Behind the goal, South Road end
- Has thanked: 32 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
I didn't hear the John Ralph comment but it's spot on.Young Georgie wrote:Carlton aren't that bad but were not the better team on the night and the Dogs on current form are still a side we match up well on and in all likelihood would beat.
Now we've got to put up with 2 weeks of useless negativity while our team sits on top of the ladder 12-0.
After the barrage of Blues hype after Friday where everyone in the media it seemed was banging on about how good they were and how lucky we were, it was great to hear John Ralph from the Hun on SEN this morning state that in actual fact St Kilda was a '6-8 goal better side' on the night (never one to exaggerate..) and Carlton bumbled and stumbled their way to numerous goals making the most of their opportunities and of their luck. He said St Kilda's structure was far superior with the difference was telling in the end.
Discusseded...let's move onwards and upwards
The ball ran for Carlton, and we made a few critical marking errors, so they were able to maintain score board pressure against the odds.
A classic example was the goal by O'hAilpin (I think in the last quarter). Appalling kick off the side of the boot as the ball is delivered forward. Two of our guys lead in the race for the ball, but a shocking bounce puts the ball back onto Setanta's chest. Our guys are now wrong-footed and a clear way to goal opens up.
We were a 4-goal better team on the night and we're a 6-goal better team overall.
- BAM! (shhhh)
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2134
- Joined: Thu 24 May 2007 5:23pm
- Location: The little voice inside your head
Re: The elephant in the room
When Carlton gets over it's euphoria, they'll need to consider the following:Thinline wrote:Carlton, who are'nt really that good, were the better team on Friday night.
AND
The Dogs would beat us by 5 goals on current form.
Discuss...
They played one of the best games they've played in five years, and still weren't able to get over the Saints who didn't play near their best football of the year.
The Saints form isn't what it was 6 rounds ago, but as people were saying then, the only form that matters is September form... at which time I can only hope the Saints bring the level of determination the Blues did on Friday.
Great game to watch, though I'd have been filthy if we'd lost.
"Everything comes to he who hustles while he waits"
- Henry Ford
- Henry Ford
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Agree with half of the OP.
Didn't think Carlton were the best side friday night.
However I do think on current form the dogs would beat us,comfortably. They're flying at the moment,we're not.
September is another story however. Keeping a 100% list is paramount for us to have any success in the finals
Didn't think Carlton were the best side friday night.
However I do think on current form the dogs would beat us,comfortably. They're flying at the moment,we're not.
September is another story however. Keeping a 100% list is paramount for us to have any success in the finals
Bring back the Lockett era
- Young Georgie
- Club Player
- Posts: 256
- Joined: Wed 11 Jul 2007 5:11pm
- Location: Northern outpost
The Dogs are on a winning streak sure but are they flying enough to beat us 'comfortably'? Port are a rabble, Richmond (Wallace's last game where they 'cared') a rabble, Swans have shown little this year when under pressure, lost to Cats in spirited showing, scraped home against the Demons, good win over the Crows and got beaten by the Saints. Flying??jonesy wrote:Agree with half of the OP.
Didn't think Carlton were the best side friday night.
However I do think on current form the dogs would beat us,comfortably. They're flying at the moment,we're not.
September is another story however. Keeping a 100% list is paramount for us to have any success in the finals
September is indeed another story.
Graceful, elusive, strong overhead and no Easybeat!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4655
- Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 2:04pm
- Location: Melb
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 23 times
Destroyed Port where half of Port's list were playing back home in front of family. Led by 70 points at half time interstate against Sydney who never ever get thrashed. Would of beat Geelong if Johnson hadn't of choked from 10 meters out...I'd say they're flying.
We played them 6 weeks ago when we were flying. We are not flying at the moment,far from it.
For what it's worth our 'flying' was much more impressive than the dogs 'flying'. However on the current teams from from the last month,the dogs are going better.
We played them 6 weeks ago when we were flying. We are not flying at the moment,far from it.
For what it's worth our 'flying' was much more impressive than the dogs 'flying'. However on the current teams from from the last month,the dogs are going better.
Bring back the Lockett era