Why are we losing the contested ball?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4817
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 313 times
Been thanked: 431 times

Why are we losing the contested ball?

Post: # 962239Post Moods »

Not sure if this has been discussed anywhere on here, but I noticed last week we lost the contested ball badly, and from the stats that were put up at the end of each 1/4 it looked like we were getting SMASHED in contested ball. On the flip side we out tackled the hawks 2:1. Is that b/c we couldn't win the ball so we had to keep tackling?

A trademark of our game last year was fwd pressure, tackling and winning contested ball. Fwd pressure is still reasonable but not up to last years standards, tackling is still good, but contested ball is going backwards lately? I would have thought with ruckmen not being the hawks strong suit, that we would have a definite advantage in this area, and in my opinion both our rucks did quite well. I know Joey and Dal injuring themselves caused them to have limited impact, but are we really THAT dependent on them to win us the ball.

Considering how easily they won clearances at stoppages in particular, this is one area of our game we have to address urgently I reckon if we are to be a show in September. To get within a couple of goals of the hawks let alone scratch out a draw was a great effort under those circumstances.

Blokes like mini who is in the team for this very reason have to do better. Gilbert is also usually very good at winning contested ball (particularly in marking situations)

Can anyone else think of reasons as to why this crucial stat has been dropping off lately?


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Post: # 962242Post FQF »

We lost a very good contested ball winner last year, and his replacement - despite being impressive when played - has spent most of the season in the VFL or injured...


User avatar
rodgerfox
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 9:10am
Has thanked: 425 times
Been thanked: 327 times

Post: # 962243Post rodgerfox »

The same reason Collingwood have improved their contested ball.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 962246Post plugger66 »

rodgerfox wrote:The same reason Collingwood have improved their contested ball.
Not sure it is that simple. Ball missed about 6 games last year and our contested ball didnt drop.


noob
Club Player
Posts: 1762
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 10:32am

Post: # 962247Post noob »

noticed the last couple of games that collingwood and hawthorn have jumped us on the first 10 minutes of each quarter (except for the first) seem to let those teams kick the first or 2 goals of each quarter playing catch up.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30058
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 704 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Post: # 962249Post saintsRrising »

FQF wrote:We lost a very good contested ball winner last year, and his replacement - despite being impressive when played - has spent most of the season in the VFL or injured...

I would have thought that Peake has been his replacement in most games this year.

I think Lyon was always looking for more run in the midfield this year which is why he targetted Lovett and Peake.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18455
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1787 times
Been thanked: 807 times

Post: # 962292Post bigcarl »

FQF wrote:We lost a very good contested ball winner last year, and his replacement - despite being impressive when played - has spent most of the season in the VFL or injured...
I'd be adding Steven to the midfield rotation immediately. He's going to be a gun.

Also, don't underestimate the injury to Dal Santo on Friday night. He appeared to be deliberately targeted by Hawthorn.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 962296Post plugger66 »

bigcarl wrote:
FQF wrote:We lost a very good contested ball winner last year, and his replacement - despite being impressive when played - has spent most of the season in the VFL or injured...
I'd be adding Steven to the midfield rotation immediately. He's going to be a gun.

Also, don't underestimate the injury to Dal Santo on Friday night. He appeared to be deliberately targeted by Hawthorn.
If we add Steven to the midfield rotation I think he will be buggered by the time of the finals. Leave him till the finals and only if we really need him then.


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Post: # 962309Post FQF »

I don't think Ross planned on compromising our grunt for leg speed.
Therefore the recruitment of Peake and Lovett wasn't to compensate for Ball. I reckon he just banked on Armo stepping up to the plate.

True about Dal Santo, his in and under work, especially getting the clearances, is very underrated. His injury - and the constant bleeding - would have hurt the whole team's clearance work.

CJ is also very good at getting the quick kick out of the pack. A valuable attribute...


User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Why are we losing the contested ball?

Post: # 962314Post stinger »

Moods wrote:Not sure if this has been discussed anywhere on here, but I noticed last week we lost the contested ball badly, and from the stats that were put up at the end of each 1/4 it looked like we were getting SMASHED in contested ball. On the flip side we out tackled the hawks 2:1. Is that b/c we couldn't win the ball so we had to keep tackling?

A trademark of our game last year was fwd pressure, tackling and winning contested ball. Fwd pressure is still reasonable but not up to last years standards, tackling is still good, but contested ball is going backwards lately? I would have thought with ruckmen not being the hawks strong suit, that we would have a definite advantage in this area, and in my opinion both our rucks did quite well. I know Joey and Dal injuring themselves caused them to have limited impact, but are we really THAT dependent on them to win us the ball.

Considering how easily they won clearances at stoppages in particular, this is one area of our game we have to address urgently I reckon if we are to be a show in September. To get within a couple of goals of the hawks let alone scratch out a draw was a great effort under those circumstances.

Blokes like mini who is in the team for this very reason have to do better. Gilbert is also usually very good at winning contested ball (particularly in marking situations)

Can anyone else think of reasons as to why this crucial stat has been dropping off lately?

because eddy is out of the side as is geary...ammo is injured and ball is now playing for the filth......who's contested ball has gone through the roof......well...you asked..... :wink:


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18455
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1787 times
Been thanked: 807 times

Post: # 962316Post bigcarl »

plugger66 wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
FQF wrote:We lost a very good contested ball winner last year, and his replacement - despite being impressive when played - has spent most of the season in the VFL or injured...
I'd be adding Steven to the midfield rotation immediately. He's going to be a gun.

Also, don't underestimate the injury to Dal Santo on Friday night. He appeared to be deliberately targeted by Hawthorn.
If we add Steven to the midfield rotation I think he will be buggered by the time of the finals. Leave him till the finals and only if we really need him then.
I dunno mate, got a feeling about this kid. I think he can win hard balls.


User avatar
Mr Magic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12701
Joined: Fri 04 May 2007 9:38am
Has thanked: 717 times
Been thanked: 401 times

Post: # 962318Post Mr Magic »

bigcarl wrote:
FQF wrote:We lost a very good contested ball winner last year, and his replacement - despite being impressive when played - has spent most of the season in the VFL or injured...
I'd be adding Steven to the midfield rotation immediately. He's going to be a gun.

Also, don't underestimate the injury to Dal Santo on Friday night. He appeared to be deliberately targeted by Hawthorn.
Surely not?
That would be unmanly of them, wouldn't it?


And they're not that type of football club.
They're genteel.
Really responsible citizens.
The Family Club.

Never forget that their President stated he would sack any Hawthorn player who had a 'positive drug test, so we know they are all clean skins because they're all still there.


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18455
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1787 times
Been thanked: 807 times

Post: # 962320Post bigcarl »

Mr Magic wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
FQF wrote:We lost a very good contested ball winner last year, and his replacement - despite being impressive when played - has spent most of the season in the VFL or injured...
I'd be adding Steven to the midfield rotation immediately. He's going to be a gun.

Also, don't underestimate the injury to Dal Santo on Friday night. He appeared to be deliberately targeted by Hawthorn.
Surely not?
That would be unmanly of them, wouldn't it?


And they're not that type of football club.
They're genteel.
Really responsible citizens.
The Family Club.

Never forget that their President stated he would sack any Hawthorn player who had a 'positive drug test, so we know they are all clean skins because
they're all still there.
:lol:


Legendary
Club Player
Posts: 1900
Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 11:35am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 56 times

Post: # 962327Post Legendary »

Lenny mentioned it after the game, said it was something they were keen to address and would keep working on.


SaintSimmo
Club Player
Posts: 1684
Joined: Thu 11 Dec 2008 10:00pm
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 962332Post SaintSimmo »

jack steven should be our finals secret weapon.
play him in the forward line for the rest of the year come finals time unleash the beast!!


Sainter for life.
FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Post: # 962337Post FQF »

Legendary wrote:Lenny mentioned it after the game, said it was something they were keen to address and would keep working on.
Actions not words...

Other than Lenny though, we don't really have any stand out brilliant in and under players. Dal and Goddard are good. CJ can do his bit. Joey is serviceable.

We don't have a Bolton and Kirk. Or a Selwood and Chapman and even Bartell. Or a Ball and Obree.

Maybe I'm being too harsh, but my general feeling is that we are just one quality mid down at the moment.

It's not that we lost Ball - I don't think that was the problem - the problem is that we have not adequately replaced him. Either with a like for like or an upgrade.

I wonder how Jimmy would go with short burts in the middle...?


bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18455
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1787 times
Been thanked: 807 times

Post: # 962344Post bigcarl »

FQF wrote:I wonder how Jimmy would go with short burts in the middle...?
Not a bad thought. Maybe even Raph if he can regain some match fitness. But I reckon Steven is worth a go there.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 962350Post plugger66 »

bigcarl wrote:
FQF wrote:I wonder how Jimmy would go with short burts in the middle...?
Not a bad thought. Maybe even Raph if he can regain some match fitness. But I reckon Steven is worth a go there.
Sorry but Jimmy and Raph arent midfielders. Jack will be but I doubt much if at all this season.


FQF
SS Life Member
Posts: 2595
Joined: Fri 03 Jul 2009 1:24am

Post: # 962354Post FQF »

plugger66 wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
FQF wrote:I wonder how Jimmy would go with short burts in the middle...?
Not a bad thought. Maybe even Raph if he can regain some match fitness. But I reckon Steven is worth a go there.
Sorry but Jimmy and Raph arent midfielders. Jack will be but I doubt much if at all this season.
Jimmy could be anything. He has the body strength and disposal to do it... perhaps he just needs to experience.

He wouldn't be the tallest midfielder going round. And we can see from his work in the backline that his hustle and bustle approach in accurately clearing the ball from down back that he has what it takes under pressure.

I don't mean a fulltime midfielder. But Pavlich goes into the middle for short and very successful bursts. So does Goodes.

Not that Jimmy is of that quality (yet) but it shows that bigger bodied players can make an impact.


sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Post: # 962358Post sunsaint »

saintsRrising wrote:
FQF wrote:We lost a very good contested ball winner last year, and his replacement - despite being impressive when played - has spent most of the season in the VFL or injured...

I would have thought that Peake has been his replacement in most games this year.

I think Lyon was always looking for more run in the midfield this year which is why he targetted Lovett and Peake.
disagree with the anti-ball sentiment, but agree with the change in direction this year, whether it is planned or otherwise.
And also disagree that Lyon intended Lovett and Peake to replace Ball in the middle they were always going to be outside players.

There has been a noticeable drop in contested ball, and Im surprised there has not been more discussion about it. Last year we had a good combo of Gardiner and King, this year we have only the 1 primary ruckman carrying the load to hit the ball to advantage. Then getting the ball now all rests on Hayes and Jones in the middle.
And this is where I get confused, we have a game plan that plays for stoppages, the very stat that we seem to be getting worse at playing.


Seeya
*************
bigcarl
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18455
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 1:36am
Has thanked: 1787 times
Been thanked: 807 times

Post: # 962360Post bigcarl »

plugger66 wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
FQF wrote:I wonder how Jimmy would go with short burts in the middle...?
Not a bad thought. Maybe even Raph if he can regain some match fitness. But I reckon Steven is worth a go there.
Sorry but Jimmy and Raph arent midfielders. Jack will be but I doubt much if at all this season.
There you go, pigeon-holing players again. No lateral thought at all. We were smashed at the clearances and need someone in there to win the hard ball and give Lenny a hand.


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 962362Post plugger66 »

FQF wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
bigcarl wrote:
FQF wrote:I wonder how Jimmy would go with short burts in the middle...?
Not a bad thought. Maybe even Raph if he can regain some match fitness. But I reckon Steven is worth a go there.
Sorry but Jimmy and Raph arent midfielders. Jack will be but I doubt much if at all this season.
Jimmy could be anything. He has the body strength and disposal to do it... perhaps he just needs to experience.

He wouldn't be the tallest midfielder going round. And we can see from his work in the backline that his hustle and bustle approach in accurately clearing the ball from down back that he has what it takes under pressure.

I don't mean a fulltime midfielder. But Pavlich goes into the middle for short and very successful bursts. So does Goodes.

Not that Jimmy is of that quality (yet) but it shows that bigger bodied players can make an impact.
He isnt Pavlich. He is a 3rd back or forward. Not fast enough with hands or feet or good enough below his knees to be a mid. Body has nohing to do with it.


User avatar
mbogo
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2494
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:40pm
Location: Hogwarts
Been thanked: 29 times

Post: # 962376Post mbogo »

I know it is unfashionable and unpalatable and that we could not afford to keep Luke Ball (well that is what I am saying to opposition supporters) but it is pretty apparent that he has gone well at Collingwood - their supporters are raving about his hard-ball gets and that he fact that he has released players like Didak and Swan for the cleaner off the ball work. Two of his best games were also against us!
Makes me sick when this is compounded by our failure to replace his in and under stuff. Somehow we need to fix this come finals time. Maybe Goddard is the answer when we get Gram back to fitness and maybe Raph and Bakes back so he is not needed up back so much.


This is a team game and there is no room for individuals who think they are above walking through the fire.
SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 962390Post SainterK »

I am not too fussed, we seem to have gears this year....and certainly seem capable of winning enough of it when the game is up for grabs (I have erased last week from my memory)

Our approach to September seems very Geelong like this year.


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4817
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 313 times
Been thanked: 431 times

Post: # 962416Post Moods »

SainterK wrote:I am not too fussed, we seem to have gears this year....and certainly seem capable of winning enough of it when the game is up for grabs (I have erased last week from my memory)

Our approach to September seems very Geelong like this year.
What gear were we in on Friday night SainterK? I kept thinking that we were about to break away but we just couldn't get hands on the ball at the clearances.

Having said that, the hawks are a quality outfit with some fair in and under types. We need to aim to break even with them.


Post Reply