Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785796Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

Let's give Dan a couple of years before making a harsh call on his recruitment. It's not fair on anyone involved.

We all agree that we want Dan back and firing ASAP though.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Toy Saint
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2203
Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
Location: Del Mar, California
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785825Post Toy Saint »

Cairnsman wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 9:43am
DJ Higgins wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 9:27am Hanneberry so far is a mistake, no one is disagreeing with that at the moment, myself included. But I will wait until the end of the year to write him off completely.
There is a big chance DH will provide great value for money over the duration of his contract term so your generalisation is factually incorrect.

If Hawthorn recruits a player with serious injury issues and rebuilds that player they are deemed as revolutionary, if we rebuild DH how will the club be viewed?

As you say let's wait and see how the process goes before we label the selection a mistake.

Hawthorn knowingly and openly recruited a player (or several) with known damage and and set about repairing them. When St Kilda recruited Hannebery, it 'sold' it's supporters an "A Grade" premium recruit, who would have an immediate and positive impact on our club.

Most of the footy world believed Hannebury was 'banged up', as has been demonstrated over the previous 2 years. It's fair to say many of our supporters were skeptical, and have questioned the clubs judgment. Many of us would be disappointed, and rightly critical of the club if we didn't even bother with a medical check.

When Hawthorn recruited O'Meara and Scully, they explained to their fans the medical risk they were taking. It appears that St Kilda on the other hand have either deliberately misled their fans or alternately they have made a poor decision as a result of the lack of due diligence.

Furthermore, my personal view is that we should be recruiting, younger and faster outside mids, and not older, slower inside types.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18542
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1876 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785826Post SaintPav »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 9:54am Let's give Dan a couple of years before making a harsh call on his recruitment. It's not fair on anyone involved.

We all agree that we want Dan back and firing ASAP though.
A couple of years?

You must be one procrastinator.

If he can't get on the park this year and play at least 6 games, he will be a bust.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785858Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.

How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.

A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.

I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13244
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1286 times
Been thanked: 1977 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785864Post The_Dud »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 2:29pm Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.

How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.

A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.

I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
The difference is Jager was 23 coming into his prime, while DH is 28/29 with his prime well behind him.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
sunsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5212
Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
Has thanked: 65 times
Been thanked: 318 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785872Post sunsaint »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 2:29pm Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.

How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.

A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.

I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
Im sorry Ted but your support for DH and the clubs decision does not play out in any common sense standpoint
JOM is 25 so more a long term prospect - DH is 28 and you would reasonably expect immediate impact
But given the writing on the wall with his injury interrupted two seasons (now into the third)
The decision just smacks of a last fish in the barrel over paid, Vice captains call

Any comment on the above would be appreciated - but one last point
DH might come back in the latter half of 2019 underdone and will need another pre-season to get right up to speed
SO how would you swing it if the club announced next year they were signing a 29yr old on a 4yr contract at 800k?
(shhh we wont mention the previous 3yrs of injury)


Seeya
*************
User avatar
saintkid
Club Player
Posts: 1740
Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
Has thanked: 140 times
Been thanked: 296 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785878Post saintkid »

sunsaint wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 3:42pm
tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 2:29pm Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.

How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.

A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.

I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
Im sorry Ted but your support for DH and the clubs decision does not play out in any common sense standpoint
JOM is 25 so more a long term prospect - DH is 28 and you would reasonably expect immediate impact
But given the writing on the wall with his injury interrupted two seasons (now into the third)
The decision just smacks of a last fish in the barrel over paid, Vice captains call

Any comment on the above would be appreciated - but one last point
DH might come back in the latter half of 2019 underdone and will need another pre-season to get right up to speed
SO how would you swing it if the club announced next year they were signing a 29yr old on a 4yr contract at 800k?
(shhh we wont mention the previous 3yrs of injury)

Exactly, there is no common sense in the DH recruitment decision and quite frankly, still hard to believe, on all fronts, why Lethlean and co would sign an injury-ravaged 29yr old on a 5 year contract at $800k per year!

If, as some say, Lethlean pushed hard for D H, he needs to be held accountable, as St Kilda can ill afford to blow $4m with the way their finances are going.
Last edited by saintkid on Sat 20 Apr 2019 5:23pm, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
The_Dud
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13244
Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
Location: Bendigo
Has thanked: 1286 times
Been thanked: 1977 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785884Post The_Dud »

Yep, exactly.

If ANY of our young guns leave within the next 5 years due to us not being able to offer them enough $$$, it will add to this monumental f-up and be directly on the heads of those who approved the DH signing.


All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
DJ Higgins
Club Player
Posts: 1854
Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
Has thanked: 53 times
Been thanked: 268 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785891Post DJ Higgins »

Fairly odd points of view in here. DH might come good sure but after a year here we will know how good the decision was. We are currently being kicked in AFL.com on how to lose 400k which is true. It's almost stupid to compare O Meara to hanneberry. One young and injury known. One older and our due diligence was shocking


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18542
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1876 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1785892Post SaintPav »

tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 2:29pm Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.

How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.

A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.

I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
No, not negative just being realistic.

Too bad you just can't hack the truth.

You’re entitled to your compromised opinion no matter how misinformed it is but so is everyone else but your logic and head in the sand attitude begars believe.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786014Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

The truth is Dan is into a 5 year deal. Do not write off a 3 x AA just yet. He will be a massive bonus when fit and firing and it's way too premature to write him off. Very dishonest in fact where reality is not being interpreted properly.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
User avatar
perfectionist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8957
Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 342 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786036Post perfectionist »

He and Jake would fit very nicely into this team at the minute.


User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786081Post Joffa Burns »

perfectionist wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 8:35pm He and Jake would fit very nicely into this team at the minute.
Who gets dropped for Hannebery if he is fit?


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11293
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1287 times
Been thanked: 435 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786110Post Sainternist »

No doubt, Damien Barrett will still rattle on about the club wasting 400K, even after a 4 and 1 start. FFS!!


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18542
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1525 times
Been thanked: 1876 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786114Post SaintPav »

Barrett is a flog but they are still two separate issues..


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Saint wagga
Club Player
Posts: 1081
Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786115Post Saint wagga »

Best way to keep sticking it up guys like Barrett is to keep winning!! Just loving it!!


saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22563
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8521 times
Been thanked: 3752 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786180Post saynta »

Saw Dan at the Tigers game, sitting with a couple of his swannie mates.


User avatar
saintbrat
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 44575
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
Location: saints zone
Has thanked: 6 times
Been thanked: 188 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786211Post saintbrat »

Also at Saints game prior


StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
Image
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786272Post Joffa Burns »



Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8572
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1523 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786273Post kosifantutti »

saynta wrote: Sat 20 Apr 2019 11:46pm Saw Dan at the Tigers game, sitting with a couple of his swannie mates.
He was in the rooms for Kieran Jack’s milestone game. 250?


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22563
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8521 times
Been thanked: 3752 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786413Post saynta »

saintbrat wrote: Sun 21 Apr 2019 1:27am Also at Saints game prior
I understand he is one of the first into our rooms after games. According to Sinclair.


User avatar
tedtheodorelogan2018
SS Life Member
Posts: 3022
Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
Has thanked: 559 times
Been thanked: 452 times

Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season

Post: # 1786415Post tedtheodorelogan2018 »

Just imagine when Zak Jones and Hanners are in the midfield group next year.


Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Post Reply