Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Let's give Dan a couple of years before making a harsh call on his recruitment. It's not fair on anyone involved.
We all agree that we want Dan back and firing ASAP though.
We all agree that we want Dan back and firing ASAP though.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
-
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2203
- Joined: Wed 19 Aug 2009 10:32pm
- Location: Del Mar, California
- Has thanked: 34 times
- Been thanked: 237 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Cairnsman wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 9:43amThere is a big chance DH will provide great value for money over the duration of his contract term so your generalisation is factually incorrect.DJ Higgins wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 9:27am Hanneberry so far is a mistake, no one is disagreeing with that at the moment, myself included. But I will wait until the end of the year to write him off completely.
If Hawthorn recruits a player with serious injury issues and rebuilds that player they are deemed as revolutionary, if we rebuild DH how will the club be viewed?
As you say let's wait and see how the process goes before we label the selection a mistake.
Hawthorn knowingly and openly recruited a player (or several) with known damage and and set about repairing them. When St Kilda recruited Hannebery, it 'sold' it's supporters an "A Grade" premium recruit, who would have an immediate and positive impact on our club.
Most of the footy world believed Hannebury was 'banged up', as has been demonstrated over the previous 2 years. It's fair to say many of our supporters were skeptical, and have questioned the clubs judgment. Many of us would be disappointed, and rightly critical of the club if we didn't even bother with a medical check.
When Hawthorn recruited O'Meara and Scully, they explained to their fans the medical risk they were taking. It appears that St Kilda on the other hand have either deliberately misled their fans or alternately they have made a poor decision as a result of the lack of due diligence.
Furthermore, my personal view is that we should be recruiting, younger and faster outside mids, and not older, slower inside types.
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18542
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1525 times
- Been thanked: 1876 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
A couple of years?tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 9:54am Let's give Dan a couple of years before making a harsh call on his recruitment. It's not fair on anyone involved.
We all agree that we want Dan back and firing ASAP though.
You must be one procrastinator.
If he can't get on the park this year and play at least 6 games, he will be a bust.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.
How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.
A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.
I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.
A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.
I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13244
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1286 times
- Been thanked: 1977 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
The difference is Jager was 23 coming into his prime, while DH is 28/29 with his prime well behind him.tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 2:29pm Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.
How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.
A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.
I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5212
- Joined: Mon 07 Aug 2006 9:50pm
- Location: Queensland - Beautiful one day ... you know the rest
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 318 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Im sorry Ted but your support for DH and the clubs decision does not play out in any common sense standpointtedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 2:29pm Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.
How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.
A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.
I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
JOM is 25 so more a long term prospect - DH is 28 and you would reasonably expect immediate impact
But given the writing on the wall with his injury interrupted two seasons (now into the third)
The decision just smacks of a last fish in the barrel over paid, Vice captains call
Any comment on the above would be appreciated - but one last point
DH might come back in the latter half of 2019 underdone and will need another pre-season to get right up to speed
SO how would you swing it if the club announced next year they were signing a 29yr old on a 4yr contract at 800k?
(shhh we wont mention the previous 3yrs of injury)
Seeya
*************
*************
- saintkid
- Club Player
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Tue 16 Sep 2008 12:30am
- Has thanked: 140 times
- Been thanked: 296 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
sunsaint wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 3:42pmIm sorry Ted but your support for DH and the clubs decision does not play out in any common sense standpointtedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 2:29pm Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.
How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.
A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.
I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
JOM is 25 so more a long term prospect - DH is 28 and you would reasonably expect immediate impact
But given the writing on the wall with his injury interrupted two seasons (now into the third)
The decision just smacks of a last fish in the barrel over paid, Vice captains call
Any comment on the above would be appreciated - but one last point
DH might come back in the latter half of 2019 underdone and will need another pre-season to get right up to speed
SO how would you swing it if the club announced next year they were signing a 29yr old on a 4yr contract at 800k?
(shhh we wont mention the previous 3yrs of injury)
Exactly, there is no common sense in the DH recruitment decision and quite frankly, still hard to believe, on all fronts, why Lethlean and co would sign an injury-ravaged 29yr old on a 5 year contract at $800k per year!
If, as some say, Lethlean pushed hard for D H, he needs to be held accountable, as St Kilda can ill afford to blow $4m with the way their finances are going.
Last edited by saintkid on Sat 20 Apr 2019 5:23pm, edited 1 time in total.
- The_Dud
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13244
- Joined: Sun 27 May 2007 9:53pm
- Location: Bendigo
- Has thanked: 1286 times
- Been thanked: 1977 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Yep, exactly.
If ANY of our young guns leave within the next 5 years due to us not being able to offer them enough $$$, it will add to this monumental f-up and be directly on the heads of those who approved the DH signing.
If ANY of our young guns leave within the next 5 years due to us not being able to offer them enough $$$, it will add to this monumental f-up and be directly on the heads of those who approved the DH signing.
All posters are equal, but some posters are more equal than others.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1854
- Joined: Fri 28 Oct 2016 11:59pm
- Has thanked: 53 times
- Been thanked: 268 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Fairly odd points of view in here. DH might come good sure but after a year here we will know how good the decision was. We are currently being kicked in AFL.com on how to lose 400k which is true. It's almost stupid to compare O Meara to hanneberry. One young and injury known. One older and our due diligence was shocking
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18542
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1525 times
- Been thanked: 1876 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
No, not negative just being realistic.tedtheodorelogan2018 wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 2:29pm Negative garbage talk. Hanners could do a knee at training this week and not play at all. It is what it is if that happens. Same as with his current comeback.
How many games did O'Mera play in his first year? 6 very ordinary ones and now he's ok.
A club has to think long term with any acquisition, not only a few months of a footy season. Same as with King and Bytel.
I wish the footy world was that very simple and lazy in writing off a player after 1 year into 5 years but it's not.
Too bad you just can't hack the truth.
You’re entitled to your compromised opinion no matter how misinformed it is but so is everyone else but your logic and head in the sand attitude begars believe.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
The truth is Dan is into a 5 year deal. Do not write off a 3 x AA just yet. He will be a massive bonus when fit and firing and it's way too premature to write him off. Very dishonest in fact where reality is not being interpreted properly.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.
- perfectionist
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8957
- Joined: Mon 30 Jul 2007 3:06pm
- Has thanked: 59 times
- Been thanked: 342 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
He and Jake would fit very nicely into this team at the minute.
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Who gets dropped for Hannebery if he is fit?perfectionist wrote: ↑Sat 20 Apr 2019 8:35pm He and Jake would fit very nicely into this team at the minute.
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 11293
- Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
- Location: South of Heaven
- Has thanked: 1287 times
- Been thanked: 435 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
No doubt, Damien Barrett will still rattle on about the club wasting 400K, even after a 4 and 1 start. FFS!!
Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18542
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1525 times
- Been thanked: 1876 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Barrett is a flog but they are still two separate issues..
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1081
- Joined: Sat 27 Apr 2013 7:44pm
- Been thanked: 52 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Best way to keep sticking it up guys like Barrett is to keep winning!! Just loving it!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22563
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8521 times
- Been thanked: 3752 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Saw Dan at the Tigers game, sitting with a couple of his swannie mates.
- saintbrat
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 44575
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 4:11pm
- Location: saints zone
- Has thanked: 6 times
- Been thanked: 188 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Also at Saints game prior
StReNgTh ThRoUgH LoYaLtY
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
Rejoicing in hope, patient in tribulation, continuing steadfastly..!!
MEMBERSHIP 2014 31,134 Membership 2015 32,746 MEMBERSHIP 2016 - 38,101
MEMBERSHIP 2017 42,095 , Membership 2018 46,998
MEMBERSHIP 2019 43,106 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php? ... 9#p1816890
MEMBERSHIP 2020 48,588 http://saintsational.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=100107
- Joffa Burns
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 7081
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
- Has thanked: 1871 times
- Been thanked: 1570 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
- kosifantutti
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8572
- Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
- Location: Back in town
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 1523 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
He was in the rooms for Kieran Jack’s milestone game. 250?
Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 22563
- Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
- Has thanked: 8521 times
- Been thanked: 3752 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
I understand he is one of the first into our rooms after games. According to Sinclair.
- tedtheodorelogan2018
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3022
- Joined: Fri 14 Sep 2018 12:02am
- Has thanked: 559 times
- Been thanked: 452 times
Re: Hannebery unlikely to play AFL in first month of season
Just imagine when Zak Jones and Hanners are in the midfield group next year.
Posters that have admitted they were wrong about Hanna's gastro and the club didn't create a cover story.
Total = 1.
Total = 1.