Sandy v box hill

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

SinCitySainter
Club Player
Posts: 990
Joined: Fri 16 Sep 2011 10:39am
Has thanked: 62 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947488Post SinCitySainter »

cwrcyn wrote: Sun 10 Apr 2022 9:34pm Horrible performance. Of the St Kilda listed players:

Bytel. 5/10..okay without having any real influence
Sharman... 4/10 hard day for any forward. A couple of good things but overall lacked influence
Kent... 6/10 was very busy and went hard.
Connolly... 5/10 tough day. Wasn't able to provide the same run as usual
Peris... 6/10 something to work with here. Once he learns a bit more he'll be a good player
Kyle...5/10 this guy is super quick. Chases and tackles hard. Just needs to learn how to get an easy kick
Heath... 4/10 Will be a player. Fitness will take time. Great attitude.
Allison 2/10. Another disappointing performance. Looks lost out there
Campbell 8/10. Our best.
Highmore...6/10. Solid as usual
Owens. 5/10. Busty early but faded. Needs to develop his outside running
Owens. "Busty early", ohh Matron, the cheeky blighter.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4321
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1442 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947524Post cwrcyn »

Mich Owens aka Hattie Jaques (or Barbara Windsor)


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 1012
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 371 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947614Post Killa »

I though that the dozen Listed players each showed something at various times

Apart from Kent they are still young and developing

Again I do not understand the knock on Allison

Allan will be better for the experience - and if our injury list allows some experience around him

The scoreboard was disappointing but at this level it is not necessarily the scoreboard - it is the little things the kids do which say they can play the game (which you would assume they can, hence on an AFL List)


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6472
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947619Post Vortex »

The Sandy ressult just further highlights the fragility of our list and the lack of depth. We need so much luck with injury this season.


User avatar
ace
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10781
Joined: Sun 16 Dec 2007 3:28pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 31 times
Been thanked: 828 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947632Post ace »

cwrcyn wrote: Sun 10 Apr 2022 9:34pm Horrible performance. Of the St Kilda listed players:

Bytel. 5/10..okay without having any real influence
Sharman... 4/10 hard day for any forward. A couple of good things but overall lacked influence
Kent... 6/10 was very busy and went hard.
Connolly... 5/10 tough day. Wasn't able to provide the same run as usual
Peris... 6/10 something to work with here. Once he learns a bit more he'll be a good player
Kyle...5/10 this guy is super quick. Chases and tackles hard. Just needs to learn how to get an easy kick
Heath... 4/10 Will be a player. Fitness will take time. Great attitude.
Allison 2/10. Another disappointing performance. Looks lost out there
Campbell 8/10. Our best.
Highmore...6/10. Solid as usual
Owens. 5/10. Busty early but faded. Needs to develop his outside running
Was Campbell good enough to be back up ruckman to Marshall or do we go with undersized Jack Hayes.


The more you know, the more you know you don't know.
When I was a young child, I knew that I knew so much about so much.
Now that I am old and know so much more, I know that I know so much about so little, and so little about so much.

If you are not engaging AI actively and aggressively, you are doing it wrong.
You are not going to lose your job to AI.
You are going lose your job to somebody who uses AI.
Your company is not going to go out of business because of AI.
Your company is going to go out of business because another company used AI.
- Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA
cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4321
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1442 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947659Post cwrcyn »

Jarrods Witts is 208cm tall and in good form. Marshall and Campbell are 201cm & 200cm . Campbell is slow without a big leap. Hayes is only 194. Simply couldn't compete with Witts in the ruck. Hayes offers much more around the ground, though. It'll be a hard call for the selectors. We are ill equipped to have a genuinely competitive second ruckman in this game, unfortunately.


User avatar
D.B.Cooper
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2168
Joined: Sun 24 Oct 2021 5:50pm
Has thanked: 775 times
Been thanked: 731 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947664Post D.B.Cooper »

cwrcyn wrote: Sun 10 Apr 2022 9:34pm Horrible performance. Of the St Kilda listed players:

Owens. 5/10. Busty early but faded.
That can't be good :oops:


There's only one rule in the jungle! When the LYON's hungry, he eats!
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30096
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 711 times
Been thanked: 1234 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947699Post saintsRrising »

cwrcyn wrote: Tue 12 Apr 2022 9:26am Jarrods Witts is 208cm tall and in good form. Marshall and Campbell are 201cm & 200cm . Campbell is slow without a big leap. Hayes is only 194. Simply couldn't compete with Witts in the ruck. Hayes offers much more around the ground, though. It'll be a hard call for the selectors. We are ill equipped to have a genuinely competitive second ruckman in this game, unfortunately.

Suns ruck combo is Witts and Chol. That is a pretty hand combination at the ruck contests.

Pittonet missed for the Blues and so they went with Tom De Koning, and the Hayes sized Silvagni.

HOs for the game were Wiits 42, DK 15, Chol 10, SOSOS 4.

Chol is 200 cm with a big leap. Chol is mainly playing as a key forward.


While slow around the ground, Witts is a HO beast and had the better of Gawn this season in the ruck, though Gawn and Jackson had the edge in the around the ground work..

Even with Paddy we may well have lost the HO's. Without him that is certain.

Our rucks need to exploit Witts around the ground. Though Wiits is handy around the ground despite his lack of pace.

Against the Pies for the first half a game our midfield was poor to our losing ruck, and so how well we rove off Witts will quite possibly determine who wins.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Trev from the Bush
SS Life Member
Posts: 2841
Joined: Fri 23 Sep 2011 4:24pm
Location: Australia
Has thanked: 774 times
Been thanked: 871 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947730Post Trev from the Bush »

Vortex wrote: Mon 11 Apr 2022 9:56pm The Sandy ressult just further highlights the fragility of our list and the lack of depth. We need so much luck with injury this season.
Ahem. With all due respect (wait for it!), rubbish, Sir!

We are not about developing the Sandringham VFL senior team, we are about developing the St Kilda AFL team. The latter seems to be coming along "nicely", in gentlemanly terms. Our midfield, which I recall being widely bagged by many St Kilda "supporters" is quickly becoming the one of competition's most potent. In a few weeks time you can add Hunter Clark and Jack Billings to the Sandy team if you truly believe our list is lacking depth. "Depth players", or spuds as ignoramuses cruelly have called them in the past, currently playing include Paddy Ryder, Callum Wilkie, Mason Wood, Jarod Lienert and Jack Hayes. These guys are chips of the gold casino variety no McCain's!


Saint supporter since '62
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10457
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 148 times
Been thanked: 1329 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947734Post CURLY »

Vortex wrote: Mon 11 Apr 2022 9:56pm The Sandy ressult just further highlights the fragility of our list and the lack of depth. We need so much luck with injury this season.
Billings, Byrnes, Hayes, Jones, Clark, Coffield, Geary, Hannebrey Higgins all out.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23139
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 9080 times
Been thanked: 3942 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947755Post saynta »

CURLY wrote: Tue 12 Apr 2022 3:15pm
Vortex wrote: Mon 11 Apr 2022 9:56pm The Sandy ressult just further highlights the fragility of our list and the lack of depth. We need so much luck with injury this season.
Billings, Byrnes, Hayes, Jones, Clark, Coffield, Geary, Hannebrey Higgins all out.
Add them to the 12 who played and the side would do a heap better.

Absolutely nothing wrong with our depth.


Killa
Club Player
Posts: 1012
Joined: Mon 06 Sep 2021 10:27am
Been thanked: 371 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947765Post Killa »

On depth and the side Sandringham put on the park last weekend:-

(NB: The games in brackets are as at the start of the 2022 Season)

Wilkie (63) Howard (85) Paton (35)
Coffield (52) Battle (56) Clark (60)
Hill (190) Steele (119) Jones (119)
Billings (144) Marshall (65) Higgins (62)
Membrey (131) King (38) Gresham (95)
Ryder (269) Crouch (113) Sinclair (119)
Butler (86) Ross (160) Wanganeen-Milera (0) Hanneberry (223)
Windhager (0) Med sub.

So:-
Coffield -> Webster
Clark -> Lienart
Jones -> McKenzie
Billings -> Wood
Higgins -> Long
Hanneberry -> Windhager

There is our depth.

Each of the "replacement" players are doing their job - and will be unlucky to return to the VFL side.

Also, this side is generally very inexperienced with 12 players under the 100 game mark and only Ryder, Hanneberry and Hill as 200 (or near in the case of Hill) players.

This is why the next 2 years will see this side come of age (noting that Ryder and Hanneberry would have, in the normal course of events, retired - or maybe not!!)

This is where the development of Heath is vital (or the recruitment of a quality ruckman noting the nibbles we have put out over the last couple of seasons to rucks on the Essendon and North Melbourne Lists).

The mids have developing options we have already seen at AFL level (so Bytel, Byrnes, Windhaher and Owen to date).

Plus we will continue to Draft and recruit.

And enjoy the development of the kids straight from schoolboy footy to VFA, including those such as Adams and Allison and the "speed brigade")

For all the negative comment you see on this site from some, under this Administration and under this Coaching and support panel St Kilda is in good hands.

Now for a Senior Coach this weekend!!!!

Enright?

And, just to add, cast your mind back to deliberately recruiting mid-aged State League talent because our List did not enjoy mid-aged experience

And the one season recruitment of Frawley and McKernan to add experienced back up for a season (so to cover for Carlisle and his problematic back and Ryder and his age).

Mind you, that got us Wilkie!!

It is all a never ending process.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6472
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947766Post Vortex »

Trev from the Bush wrote: Tue 12 Apr 2022 2:57pm
Vortex wrote: Mon 11 Apr 2022 9:56pm The Sandy ressult just further highlights the fragility of our list and the lack of depth. We need so much luck with injury this season.
Ahem. With all due respect (wait for it!), rubbish, Sir!

We are not about developing the Sandringham VFL senior team, we are about developing the St Kilda AFL team. The latter seems to be coming along "nicely", in gentlemanly terms. Our midfield, which I recall being widely bagged by many St Kilda "supporters" is quickly becoming the one of competition's most potent. In a few weeks time you can add Hunter Clark and Jack Billings to the Sandy team if you truly believe our list is lacking depth. "Depth players", or spuds as ignoramuses cruelly have called them in the past, currently playing include Paddy Ryder, Callum Wilkie, Mason Wood, Jarod Lienert and Jack Hayes. These guys are chips of the gold casino variety no McCain's!
Reality appears on the horizon about round 8 by my calculations. Let's have a chat then.
Last edited by Vortex on Tue 12 Apr 2022 5:55pm, edited 1 time in total.


Vortex
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6472
Joined: Fri 18 Sep 2020 6:51am
Has thanked: 862 times
Been thanked: 1025 times

Re: Sandy v box hill

Post: # 1947767Post Vortex »

CURLY wrote: Tue 12 Apr 2022 3:15pm
Vortex wrote: Mon 11 Apr 2022 9:56pm The Sandy ressult just further highlights the fragility of our list and the lack of depth. We need so much luck with injury this season.
Billings, Byrnes, Hayes, Jones, Clark, Coffield, Geary, Hannebrey Higgins all out.
Billings, Jones, Clarke, Higgins are all first picked types in 2022 that might be back by round 8 when our depth gets its first test against this year's outright flag favourites.

I'm looking forward to that game.


Post Reply