Dunstan

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447020Post saintspremiers »

Why wasn't Acres covering the hectares in the ones for Sandy today and someone else demoted to the development squad?


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447033Post bergholt »

saintspremiers wrote:Why wasn't Acres covering the hectares in the ones for Sandy today and someone else demoted to the development squad?
Because it was his first game in six months?


St Ick
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2227
Joined: Mon 16 Nov 2009 8:37pm

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447035Post St Ick »

saintspremiers wrote:Why wasn't Acres covering the hectares in the ones for Sandy today and someone else demoted to the development squad?
First game for 9 months, easing him into it.

As for Luke, I'm just waiting for anyone in the media to pick up that we actually wouldn't have him if we still had Mac... 16 other clubs could've had him, I'm sure they aren't shaking their heads yet but I think one day they will. I still remember how quickly we called his name when pick 18 came up, big tick for our recruiters.


Strength through Loyalty
Go those mighty Sainters!!
saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447090Post saintspremiers »

St Ick wrote:
saintspremiers wrote:Why wasn't Acres covering the hectares in the ones for Sandy today and someone else demoted to the development squad?
First game for 9 months, easing him into it.

As for Luke, I'm just waiting for anyone in the media to pick up that we actually wouldn't have him if we still had Mac... 16 other clubs could've had him, I'm sure they aren't shaking their heads yet but I think one day they will. I still remember how quickly we called his name when pick 18 came up, big tick for our recruiters.
Didn't we have pick 19 as well?

Quite possible he would've been available then also.


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Richter
SS Life Member
Posts: 3914
Joined: Wed 30 Nov 2005 1:18pm
Location: Elwood

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447095Post Richter »

No, sp, we originally had picks 24, 59, which we gave to the Hawks with Ben for 18, 19 and Shane Savage. No way he would still have been there at 24.


Hird... The unflushable one is now... just a turd...
User avatar
stinger
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 38126
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 9:06pm
Location: Australia.

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447151Post stinger »

whiskers3614 wrote:
stinger wrote:
whiskers3614 wrote:Good one.
I meant for us but if he's in the same league as Wines I can put up with it!
for us.....graeme gellie, ian stewart or glen elliott......dean greig wasn't too bad either....
Ancient history Stinger.
Not everybody on here is as old as us!
:D


.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will

"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"

However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447154Post BigMart »

There's is very little chance he won't end up a good AFL player


User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447187Post Spinner »

Dunstan is like a faster, bigger for age version of Armitage who can actually accumulate the ball.


joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447206Post joffaboy »

Richter wrote:No, sp, we originally had picks 24, 59, which we gave to the Hawks with Ben for 18, 19 and Shane Savage. No way he would still have been there at 24.
Acres would not have been there at 24 either.

We probably would have chosen Eli with pick 24 (probably not) but if that had of panned out we would not have Dunstan and Acres, still have McEvoy and Billings.

and would have some on here bemoaning the fact we didn't trade to get higher picks and our mids are crap and MCEvoy wont have any mids to ruck to and blah blah blah..........

Some on here can never give the club credit as they know better


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
User avatar
Rosco
Club Player
Posts: 1937
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2011 5:40pm
Location: Hughesdale

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447217Post Rosco »

If acres is as good as dunstan, if not better, then we have just drafted half a midfield for 10 years

Big Mac was worth 2 of those 3


Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2170
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 34 times
Been thanked: 180 times

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447241Post Zed »

joffaboy wrote:Most exciting thing is that he may be the least talented of Acres and Billings.

Salivating at the prospect :D
I only saw Acres on the ground at the intraclub for a short period but he has certainly got some natural talent. Arguably both Billings and Acres have more upside than Dunstan. However Dunstan's willingness to compete is outstanding and Im not sure either of the other boys are going to surpass Dunstan in that area.

Interesting to note the 2 boys who played against men last year (Dunstan and Eli) have stepped up with ease. Obviously Acres and billings struggled with injury , however the point Im trying to make is that perhaps its a quality that some recruiters underestimate.


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Dunstan

Post: # 1447244Post gringo »

Zed wrote:
joffaboy wrote:Most exciting thing is that he may be the least talented of Acres and Billings.

Salivating at the prospect :D
I only saw Acres on the ground at the intraclub for a short period but he has certainly got some natural talent. Arguably both Billings and Acres have more upside than Dunstan. However Dunstan's willingness to compete is outstanding and Im not sure either of the other boys are going to surpass Dunstan in that area.

Interesting to note the 2 boys who played against men last year (Dunstan and Eli) have stepped up with ease. Obviously Acres and billings struggled with injury , however the point Im trying to make is that perhaps its a quality that some recruiters underestimate.

From talking to all three at the junction training session, Dunstan is a very confident guy and looks like he loves the chatting and lime light. Acres was like a nice but very quiet country kid and Billings looked excessively shy. I won't expect Billings or Acres to be instant stars, they will probably need a few years development then explode.

Acres was being very widely talked up before an injury plagued draft year and could be anything but at the end of the day talent gets you only so far. If he and Billings have drive as well the sky is the limit for them.


Post Reply