Bulldogs Chasing Lonie

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22851
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 714 times
Been thanked: 1696 times

Re: Bulldogs Chasing Lonie

Post: # 1868875Post Teflon »

Lonie is replaceable and has 1 good game every 6 yes he scrambles but has only 1 side, goes to ground super often
He’s replaceable
I really hope we can start to rest a decent mid through the forward line who can lay a tackle and has some goal sense Gresham type is nice can do both jobs
Butler is your your specialist forward and on occasion I think pushing him up to wing is a good idea - he’s been instrumental in several transition plays back towards goal a few times and he’s reasonably quick


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7777
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 204 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: Bulldogs Chasing Lonie

Post: # 1868876Post magnifisaint »

Lonie should go. Nothing special.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16564
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3454 times
Been thanked: 2716 times

Re: Bulldogs Chasing Lonie

Post: # 1868881Post skeptic »

The thing with Kent is that with the exception of this Thursday where he was especially poor, his output really hasn’t changed all that much.

Generally gets 6-12 touches.

What has changed is he’s no longer getting on the end of a few and kicking the 1-2 goals a game...
Especially the clutch goals late.

I agree that he’s pbly had his best patch of form this year since he came to the club but for mine...
His output really hasn’t been good all season and it’s been a worry all season that ppl haven’t wanted to acknowledge because he has been involved in the odd good play.

If he gets 6 touches and 2 shots... whether their 2 goals or 2 behinds his actual output isn’t different.
He’s not been able to contribute more to the team in terms of getting possessions, setting up goals, tackles etc

It’s the exact opposite of what’s happened with King...

King’s marking hasn’t improved and his set shots have dropped quite markedly but the guys work rate and attempts to contribute have been excellent for the most part of the season.

On Thursday, he had 4 shots, three crumbed, brought the ball to ground, ran up the ground to contest and rucked at various contests.

The difference in effort and ability to get involved is night and day...
But for far too long, the coaches and forumites have valued sparkly little moments like the ball spilling out and Kent running into an open goal or getting into space and taking an uncontested mark 30 out directly in front as being a valuable indicator of contribution.

Of all of the small forwards... Kent’s contribution overall has been the worst.
Hind has shown some ability to get a lot of possession or kick difficult goals (albeit he’s badly out of form).

Lonie crumbs and works hard... is actually at the feet of the forwards

Feels to me like Kent relies far too much on the ball coming to him uncontested and once the opponents started man’ing him up properly, he’s been completely found out


User avatar
bigred
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11463
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 7:39am
Has thanked: 25 times
Been thanked: 609 times

Re: Bulldogs Chasing Lonie

Post: # 1868965Post bigred »

Kent's fumbles on Thursday night were at absolutely critical times and undid a lot of good work.

Granted, it was wet and difficult conditions and all players were not clean at times.

A good example is that intercept that Clark did...streaming through the middle. Gives a decent handball off to Kent who just Butchers it.

I'm just sick of that bulltish.


"Now the ball is loose, it gives St. Kilda a rough chance. Black. Good handpass. Voss. Schwarze now, the defender, can run and from a long way".....
User avatar
Ghost Like
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6562
Joined: Wed 19 Sep 2007 10:04pm
Has thanked: 5788 times
Been thanked: 1909 times

Re: Bulldogs Chasing Lonie

Post: # 1869080Post Ghost Like »

If the Doggies get Lonie and hold on to Daniel, does that mean Watters will be their smalls coach?


Post Reply