Post-match analysis

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7038
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 448 times

Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030334Post meher baba »

Caminiti was disappointing, but the poor guy wouldn't have had much time to prepare. Stocker didn't add much in the second half: I think Byrnes might have been a better sub.

Steele and Ross both went ok in the midfield. Crouch was disappointing. Clark was pretty meh. Sinclair did some good stuff, but was kept comparatively quiet by the Giants. Hill showed that he knew how to play finals and Wood was pretty good.

Cordy wasn't up to it IMO. I thought Howard would have gone better.

Of our five youngsters: Owens, Phillipou, NWM, Windhager and Caminiti, only NWM had a game that he might care to remember.

Up forward, Sharman was good in the first half, but then faded out. As usual, he looked rather slow. King was good, especially after Caminiti was subbed out and was therefore no longer able to interfere with his marking efforts. Gresham didn't do enough but did do some ok things. Butler did some good things but made some bad errors too. But, apart from his goal and a couple of other helpful touches, Hiiggins was a write-off.

At the end of the day, they were faster and more skilled than us. We were much better coached, which is why we only lost by 4 goals rather than 10.
Last edited by meher baba on Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:17pm, edited 1 time in total.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9433
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1198 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030336Post CURLY »

Stocker should have started was excellent.

Pou not ready was poor.

Cordy poor

Higgins poor.

Coffield Billings Howard had to play.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1663 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030356Post Teflon »

CURLY wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:15pm Stocker should have started was excellent.

Pou not ready was poor.

Cordy poor

Higgins poor.

Coffield Billings Howard had to play.
Coffield Billing’s Howard would’ve made no difference
Midfield midfield midfield
Crouch had 7 kicks 2 tackles
Ross - no impact 24
Played the game from our backline couldn’t win enough contested ball
Midfielders needed


“Yeah….nah””
User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7038
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 448 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030359Post meher baba »

One further point: what exactly was the strategy with Phillipou? What was his position? Wouldn't it have been much better for a young player's development to give him a specific position to play rather than a sort of general roving role? He seemed to get totally lost today.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9433
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1198 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030360Post CURLY »

Teflon wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:35pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:15pm Stocker should have started was excellent.

Pou not ready was poor.

Cordy poor

Higgins poor.

Coffield Billings Howard had to play.
Coffield Billing’s Howard would’ve made no difference
Midfield midfield midfield
Crouch had 7 kicks 2 tackles
Ross - no impact 24
Played the game from our backline couldn’t win enough contested ball
Midfielders needed
💯 it would have helped. Billing’s immediately improves us as does Howard. Coffield big upgrade on Windhager down back.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9433
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1198 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030361Post CURLY »

meher baba wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:37pm One further point: what exactly was the strategy with Phillipou? What was his position? Wouldn't it have been much better for a young player's development to give him a specific position to play rather than a sort of general roving role? He seemed to get totally lost today.
Ridiculous he played today and even worse starting in the middle at times.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
saynta
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22531
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 3:53pm
Has thanked: 8485 times
Been thanked: 3737 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030363Post saynta »

CURLY wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:15pm Stocker should have started was excellent.

Pou not ready was poor.

Cordy poor

Higgins poor.

Coffield Billings Howard had to play.
Yes, I agree. Also Billings or Stoker should have been in the starting 22 with Byrnes the sub.

We really missed Members too.

Wasn't our day.


Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1663 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030364Post Teflon »

CURLY wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:39pm
Teflon wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:35pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:15pm Stocker should have started was excellent.

Pou not ready was poor.

Cordy poor

Higgins poor.

Coffield Billings Howard had to play.
Coffield Billing’s Howard would’ve made no difference
Midfield midfield midfield
Crouch had 7 kicks 2 tackles
Ross - no impact 24
Played the game from our backline couldn’t win enough contested ball
Midfielders needed
💯 it would have helped. Billing’s immediately improves us as does Howard. Coffield big upgrade on Windhager down back.
Rubbish
Howard been out 4 weeks
Coffield hasn’t played all year …so bring him in for final?? Ridiculous
Billing’s can’t get a contract at other clubs if he’s your saviour we are rooted


“Yeah….nah””
Teflon
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 22760
Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
Has thanked: 706 times
Been thanked: 1663 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030365Post Teflon »

meher baba wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:37pm One further point: what exactly was the strategy with Phillipou? What was his position? Wouldn't it have been much better for a young player's development to give him a specific position to play rather than a sort of general roving role? He seemed to get totally lost today.
I didn’t hear you criticise prior to the match when we’ve played in mid rotation all year??
Expect a flood of “harry hindsight “ posts from you now as it’s par for course
Saints weren’t going further after today IF we won anyway
Great exposure for Pou he’ll learn


“Yeah….nah””
CURLY
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9433
Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
Location: WARBURTON
Has thanked: 130 times
Been thanked: 1198 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030367Post CURLY »

Teflon wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:45pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:39pm
Teflon wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:35pm
CURLY wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:15pm Stocker should have started was excellent.

Pou not ready was poor.

Cordy poor

Higgins poor.

Coffield Billings Howard had to play.
Coffield Billing’s Howard would’ve made no difference
Midfield midfield midfield
Crouch had 7 kicks 2 tackles
Ross - no impact 24
Played the game from our backline couldn’t win enough contested ball
Midfielders needed
💯 it would have helped. Billing’s immediately improves us as does Howard. Coffield big upgrade on Windhager down back.
Rubbish
Howard been out 4 weeks
Coffield hasn’t played all year …so bring him in for final?? Ridiculous
Billing’s can’t get a contract at other clubs if he’s your saviour we are rooted

No mention of saviour simply at this stage Billings far better option than Pou.


NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Lennylegs
Club Player
Posts: 206
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2020 8:14pm
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 144 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030368Post Lennylegs »

meher baba wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:37pm One further point: what exactly was the strategy with Phillipou? What was his position? Wouldn't it have been much better for a young player's development to give him a specific position to play rather than a sort of general roving role? He seemed to get totally lost today.
I absolutely loved that Pou and all the kids played today and for most of the year. Shows Ross is more than willing to look to the future, which has always been my criticism of him.

The stuff Pou would've learnt today will probably push the kid for the rest of the year. Coaching staff would know this better than anyone. The kid wants to get better and will.


Lennylegs
Club Player
Posts: 206
Joined: Sat 27 Jun 2020 8:14pm
Has thanked: 61 times
Been thanked: 144 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030370Post Lennylegs »

meher baba wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:37pm One further point: what exactly was the strategy with Phillipou? What was his position? Wouldn't it have been much better for a young player's development to give him a specific position to play rather than a sort of general roving role? He seemed to get totally lost today.
I absolutely loved that Pou and all the kids played today and for most of the year. Shows Ross is more than willing to look to the future, which has always been my criticism of him.

The stuff Pou would've learnt today will probably push the kid for the rest of the year. Coaching staff would know this better than anyone. The kid wants to get better and will.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8274
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030376Post Otiman »

Back from the match and don't think ill watch a replay.

Some thoughts:

Cordy a spud. His direct opponent plus 1 on 1s lost against Riccardi and others cost us goals. Their delivery was unpredictable but he lost too many contests.

Marshall worth his weight in gold. Single handedly carried us in the first half.

Windhager is a run with midfielder. Call him a tagger if you must. Had more of an impact and reduced Kelly's effectiveness in H2.

We are not built for ground ball contest, are pushed off it too easily and overrun too many ground balls.

Umpiring was average (both ways) but it hurt us early when the scores were tight.

Battle has gone to the next level and was our best defender today.

We overuse the ball trying to get overlap run and end up putting ourselves under pressure, especially in the centre of the ground.

For 60,000 sainters at the G, the crowd noise was pretty poor.

Forward structure and delivery was ultimately the difference today.


User avatar
meher baba
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7038
Joined: Mon 14 Aug 2006 6:49am
Location: Tasmania
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 448 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030377Post meher baba »

Teflon wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:47pm
meher baba wrote: Sat 09 Sep 2023 7:37pm One further point: what exactly was the strategy with Phillipou? What was his position? Wouldn't it have been much better for a young player's development to give him a specific position to play rather than a sort of general roving role? He seemed to get totally lost today.
I didn’t hear you criticise prior to the match when we’ve played in mid rotation all year??
Expect a flood of “harry hindsight “ posts from you now as it’s par for course
Saints weren’t going further after today IF we won anyway
Great exposure for Pou he’ll learn
Christ you are a crotchety character.

Yes, it was fine for him to play in mid rotation in home and away. But finals are a different proposition. And he looked completely lost today. That's a fact, not a question of hindsight.


"It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into."
- Jonathan Swift
User avatar
shrodes
SS Life Member
Posts: 2801
Joined: Tue 12 Aug 2014 2:34pm
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 722 times
Been thanked: 372 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030380Post shrodes »

Was also at the game. For me:

Cordy poor
Crouch poor
Sinclair average, well below his best
Marshall excellent
Hill very good and was in everything, experienced finals performance
Sharman very good, need to keep getting games into him. Brings others into the game.

Other kids were largely down on their usual output which is somewhat expected due to the spectacle so I won’t ding them too much - Mitch, Pou, Caminiti

Our forward entry is still the worst in the comp, but the unsettled structure this year probably hasn’t helped a whole lot.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8274
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030396Post Otiman »

Didn't mention NWM, all class for his game.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4161
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030397Post cwrcyn »

We were beaten with quick movement from stoppages and precise field kicking by GWS. Once they got a break of a couple of metres they were off. Our slow mids couldn't run them down. That gave them time and space to deliver to their forwards. A lot of little things went their way where seeming innocuous situations suddenly turned into a goal, like the Brad Crouch out on the full in the first

We fumbled a lot in the first half and our young forwards got in each other's way. Compounding that was our delivery inside 50. Predominantly, that was because the GWS players had the leg speed to chase down our ball carriers.

We had a young forward half. One of the youngest you'll see in a final. That was a factor.

Marshall, Steele, and Hill were huge, but no other player had significant influence. When we broke even or won clearances we kicked some goals and had GWS under pressure. Just not enough goals. However, the GWS midfield had periods
where they totally dominated us and they piled on goals.

I've been saying it since preseason. We need two quick classy midfielders and a tall gorilla fullback

If we'd had those today we could have knocked off GWS


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4161
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030400Post cwrcyn »

Overall cohesion and ball movement are dependent on midfield class and speed. That confidence of knowing your team mate will be first to the ball is critical. That was a huge advantage for GWS. Players up the field ram to positions knowing that they'd be hit on the chest. No second guessing. Just confidence that they could control ball movement.

When you have a slow midfield with B grade disposal, you don't have that confidence because you have to hedge your bets. It's like a Domino effect


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4161
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030403Post cwrcyn »

Our young players will be better for the experience. They'll work their arses off and improve again.

Phillipou has been playing like an 18 year old in recent weeks. He's looked fatigued. I don't know what his best position is yet. It'll take acouple more seasons for him to get the tank he needs. I really think this is a factor at the moment. And body strength,of course

Caminiti needs time in the gym. At 83kg, playing on guys 22 to 18kg heavier is a tough gig in your first season. Mentally, he probably wasn't ready to take the field today

Stocker is still young and I thought he wasver good today. He's seriously tough and a beautiful field kick. RL needs to keep playing him.

Owens has been amazing this season, but today was tough. He'll be a nightmare for opposition coach in the years to come

Wanganeen-Milera is a star. Played well again today

King needs to get fitter and stronger. He'll never be a pack splitter. It must have been mentally difficult to play this that dodgy shoulder. He was both good and bad today

Sharman lookslacinic,but can play. Was good today. Needs to work in his endurance

Windhager will be better next year. Unsighted in the first half,I thought he gave us something after that.


User avatar
Otiman
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8274
Joined: Thu 28 Jul 2005 11:09pm
Location: Elsewhere
Has thanked: 160 times
Been thanked: 550 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030438Post Otiman »

Many small things went against us.

Take a goal for Membrey's out, a goal for selecting Cordy over Howard, a goal for playing MCG not marvel, and a goal for poor umpiring decisions - then it's an even match.


Yorkeys
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4485
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2017 1:16pm
Has thanked: 1263 times
Been thanked: 1295 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030444Post Yorkeys »

GWS should be in the top 4.
It is better than Carlton, better than Port, probably better than Melbourne.
We are too small.
We have a great base to build on.
The exploration has shown up half a dozen that don't have the right stuff and more than that who are just terrific. If we hadn't had a final some on the list might be given a benefit of the doubt they don't deserve. Rowan and JB were marvellous. NWM and Brad Hill, fantastic.


mickey
Club Player
Posts: 119
Joined: Fri 15 Mar 2013 8:58am
Been thanked: 65 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030446Post mickey »

Cwrcyn summary was spot on. Pressure in finals exposed a few today. I've always rated Sharman and Stocker, not sure what the coaches don't see. First final for the coaches gives them an opportunity to see who stands up when it counts, youngsters are excused but experienced players have to go in the blackbook.

Our defenders were rated number 1 this year, mid to forward has been horrendous. Time for Ross and the team to fix it, the year of exploration is over.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18493
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1516 times
Been thanked: 1868 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030449Post SaintPav »

What are they going to do with the 3-4 players that couldn’t cut the mustard today and probably never will.

We know who they are..


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
axcellence
Club Player
Posts: 1358
Joined: Sun 03 Oct 2004 8:45pm
Has thanked: 91 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030451Post axcellence »

All I got was that GWS, GC etc have too many good players.
The big clubs have facilities and attract all big FAs.
North have the wooden spoon/ pick 1 market all covered.

Saints have the middle path available only to be a step ladder for the other clubs. I’ll just continue to enjoy the games which Saints might win in the future without any expectations of a second cup. I’m ok with that…. It’s just a game.


User avatar
samoht
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5728
Joined: Sun 14 Mar 2004 10:45am
Location: https://www.amazon.com.au/Fugitive-Sold ... B00EO1GCNK
Has thanked: 574 times
Been thanked: 431 times
Contact:

Re: Post-match analysis

Post: # 2030454Post samoht »

I deleted the wrong post ... this was a repeat post.


Post Reply