now let me seesainteronline wrote:St Fidelius wrote:
let me see in regards to Seaford
the answer would be they thought that would be the best fit for St Kilda blah blah, a decision had to be made blah blah
If the Moorabbin deal was presumebly out of the question and the Club was offered to relocate to Frankston and that Council offered over $3M for the relocation.
from what I hear it was over what three or four poky machines, that was the excuse I heard anyway
in regards to the membership
it would be to increase revenue
And what is wrong with that when our football department needed more funds? (get more sponsors, football departments aren't the only one short of funds, so are football supporters)[/color]and in regards to the Benny cousins decision
"Confidential information"
Have Collingwood asked about their 6 months investigations???
Why should we question our Clubs 5 month investigation??
(Don't care about Collingwood)
If you really want answers to the nitty gritty of how the Club is run, nominate your good self as a candidate to the Club and list your credentials...
Put up or shut up.
I live in Geelong
I am in an electric wheelchair with no means of personal transport to get to Linton St, let alone down to Seaford
will you pay my taxi fare from Geelong to Seaford
because if the football department is short of funds now
imagine having to pay for my taxi fare
get real
PS sorry about the larger font in red, but as you copied my reply or my method of reply, I had to have some way for people to tell the difference between now replies[/quote]
Correct! 100% agree. What the F*** was this club thinking about??
Throw them out! Fancy not having enough respect to consult our Geelong supporters if it was ok to build in Seaford, in case they were in a wheelchair and couldn't afford the taxi fare. Fairdinkum!
My only question to you is... why would you want to train in Seaford, if you're in a wheelchair, numbnuts?[/b][/b][/b][/b]
Why don't you get real?