photos of belvedere

saintdooley · Sat 12 Dec 2009 6:52pm

Saints starting something at Belvedere

recent photos of work
http://www.frankston.vic.gov.au/Newsroo ... index.aspx

http://www.frankston.vic.gov.au/Newsroo ... index.aspx

asiu · Post: # 865527Post **asiu** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 7:22pm

i chaperoned a chickybabe to honkers ,(china) and badcock

cant even remember the names of the 5starrers we stayed at , but i had my own personal butler in both

wtf do ya do with a belvedere

saintspremiers · Sat 12 Dec 2009 8:20pm

WOW!

Isn't it exciting????

Anyone?

Someone?

On a side note, I heard on the blower that North's training site at Arden St is now completed.

Shame we are 6 months behind lowly North in the training stakes!

asiu · Post: # 865536Post **asiu** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 8:25pm

WOW!

Isn't it exciting????

Anyone?

Someone?

i didnt even look at the pictures

Maxstar22 · Post: # 865545Post **Maxstar22** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 8:57pm

Went down to Franga today and notice on the "Welcome To Seaford" sign on the Nepean Hwy there was our emblem on it. Right next to to Lions Club emblem.

And low and behold on the way out, it stated "Thankyou for visiting Seaford - Home of the Stkilda Football Club".

Bernard Shakey · Sat 12 Dec 2009 9:18pm

saintspremiers wrote:WOW!

Isn't it exciting????

Anyone?

Someone?

On a side note, I heard on the blower that North's training site at Arden St is now completed.

Shame we are 6 months behind lowly North in the training stakes!

We are not six months behind North. We won't be there until after next season.

Solar · Post: # 865552Post **Solar** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 9:20pm

remind me when the roos had to fight wit the local council over trees in a carpark.... c'mon lets talk apples and apples people!

saintspremiers · Sat 12 Dec 2009 9:23pm

Solar wrote:remind me when the roos had to fight wit the local council over trees in a carpark.... c'mon lets talk apples and apples people!

We can't keep on blaming Topsy Stupid.

Nearly all councillors are farknarkles, so no doubt the ones that look after Arden St are clueless also.

The issue is how you handle the council in question and get around their never ending stupidity.

Councils by default are anti-development.

Well, that is what it appears in nearly all cases I've heard!

kosifantutti23 · Sat 12 Dec 2009 9:51pm

asiu · Post: # 865565Post **asiu** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 9:55pm

"Thereâ€™s strong vanilla on the nose of the 80-proof spirit, but the taste is all medicinal, old-school vodka like mom used to make. Though it goes down fairly smoothly, the finish is pretty harsh, with a lingering aftertaste that turns bitter after a few seconds, with a grain- and herb-like character that Iâ€™d attribute to the rye base."

asiu · Post: # 865567Post **asiu** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 9:59pm

no way , your not using that as a sex toy

asiu · Post: # 865568Post **asiu** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 10:10pm

Belvedere
by M. C. Escher
(one of my favourite artists)

Solar · Post: # 865569Post **Solar** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 10:16pm

saintspremiers wrote:
Solar wrote:remind me when the roos had to fight wit the local council over trees in a carpark.... c'mon lets talk apples and apples people!
We can't keep on blaming Topsy Stupid.

Nearly all councillors are farknarkles, so no doubt the ones that look after Arden St are clueless also.

The issue is how you handle the council in question and get around their never ending stupidity.

Councils by default are anti-development.

Well, that is what it appears in nearly all cases I've heard!

it's not blame, it's a reason

asiu · Post: # 865570Post **asiu** » Sat 12 Dec 2009 10:25pm

who did u see first ?

asiu · Post: # 865576Post **asiu** » Sun 13 Dec 2009 8:05am

he did this one in '66

and finally ...(sorry , i was off on a bit of a tangent there)

this pearler

baru

matrix · Post: # 865597Post **matrix** » Sun 13 Dec 2009 1:03pm

man they musta had soo much better acid back then.

saint66au · Post: # 865602Post **saint66au** » Sun 13 Dec 2009 1:57pm

Arial view of main complex

Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

bozza1980 · Post: # 865673Post **bozza1980** » Mon 14 Dec 2009 10:48am

saintspremiers wrote:
Shame we are 6 months behind lowly North in the training stakes!

Good on North for getting their deals in order and getting their facilities completed.

We could be a lot further advanced to if we had been prepared to accept a compromised and inferior end product.

It is a shame we will have to wait longer than we should have but we will have the elite facilities we deserve soon enough.

Saint Bev · Post: # 865761Post **Saint Bev** » Mon 14 Dec 2009 6:43pm

Surprised nobody noticed this -

St Kilda Family Day will be on Sunday 14 March 2010 at Frankston Park.

Nice of them to hold it on my Birthday, just a pity I can't be there

casey scorp · Thu 17 Dec 2009 12:22am

Saint Bev wrote:Surprised nobody noticed this -

St Kilda Family Day will be on Sunday 14 March 2010 at Frankston Park.

Will probably always have to be at Frankston Park, simply because the impact on local residents of having it at Belvedere Park would cause a backlash.

saintspremiers wrote:
We can't keep on blaming Topsy Stupid.

Nearly all councillors are farknarkles, so no doubt the ones that look after Arden St are clueless also.

The issue is how you handle the council in question and get around their never ending stupidity.

Councils by default are anti-development.

Well, that is what it appears in nearly all cases I've heard!

Not all it seems â€“ Agreement executed between MFC and Casey Council in June 2009 for MFC facility at Casey Fields. Construction underway in September 2009 and due for completion in March 2010.

saintdooley · Thu 17 Dec 2009 1:00am

Saint Bev wrote:Surprised nobody noticed this -

St Kilda Family Day will be on Sunday 14 March 2010 at Frankston Park.

Nice of them to hold it on my Birthday, just a pity I can't be there

it is actually one of the most boring events you could possibly go to in the history of the St. Kilda F.C

nothing happens

its always windy and cold in frankston whenever i go down there! same as bloody port games at Aami, we could play them at 2.10pn Jan 20th in the middle of summer and some how it will bucket down.

saintspremiers · Thu 17 Dec 2009 8:02am

casey scorp wrote: Not all it seems â€“ Agreement executed between MFC and Casey Council in June 2009 for MFC facility at Casey Fields. Construction underway in September 2009 and due for completion in March 2010.

So how can they complete the project in only 6 months Casey?

is it because it's a reno rather than a greenfields site which ours is?

Let's compare Apples with Apples perleese!!!

Bernard Shakey · Thu 17 Dec 2009 10:14am

saintspremiers wrote:
casey scorp wrote: Not all it seems â€“ Agreement executed between MFC and Casey Council in June 2009 for MFC facility at Casey Fields. Construction underway in September 2009 and due for completion in March 2010.
So how can they complete the project in only 6 months Casey?

is it because it's a reno rather than a greenfields site which ours is?

Let's compare Apples with Apples perleese!!!

Exactly, Melbourne are not based at Casey. They have just built a shelter shed to keep out of the wind.

Moccha · Post: # 866337Post **Moccha** » Thu 17 Dec 2009 10:36am

Really, who gives a s*** about Melbourne!

bigmicka · Post: # 866397Post **bigmicka** » Thu 17 Dec 2009 2:56pm

saintspremiers wrote:
Solar wrote:remind me when the roos had to fight wit the local council over trees in a carpark.... c'mon lets talk apples and apples people!
We can't keep on blaming Topsy Stupid.

Nearly all councillors are farknarkles, so no doubt the ones that look after Arden St are clueless also.

The issue is how you handle the council in question and get around their never ending stupidity.

Councils by default are anti-development.

Well, that is what it appears in nearly all cases I've heard!

Ah yes we can. Topsy then got replaced by the moron who was running the Moorabbin Urban forest. The same group who was trying to turn the carpark into a garden. He is a prominent Hawthorn member from memory and has not wanted us at that site for years upon years.