Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Junction Oval
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2867
- Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
- Been thanked: 19 times
Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
A stupid reaction by him on Sunday. Very costly with Fisher out, to both Tom and the Club.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 379
- Joined: Mon 04 Sep 2006 10:21am
- Location: McKinnon
- Been thanked: 8 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Agree- silly thing to do.
In terms of demerit points it is hard to believe Embley's act of dropping his knees into his opponent is deemed the same as Simpkins jab.
It may be just me but that was a pretty low act from Embley.
Additionally, I am unsure how, comparing it to previous cases (Milne/Judd...), Petrie gets off! Pushing is usually done with an open hand not a clawing type action.
As usual I am perplexed by MRP decisions.
In terms of demerit points it is hard to believe Embley's act of dropping his knees into his opponent is deemed the same as Simpkins jab.
It may be just me but that was a pretty low act from Embley.
Additionally, I am unsure how, comparing it to previous cases (Milne/Judd...), Petrie gets off! Pushing is usually done with an open hand not a clawing type action.
As usual I am perplexed by MRP decisions.
Give me one flag & I'll go to my grave a happy man.
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
And..........Spencer offered 3 weeks for his hit on Benny Mac !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
bergsone wrote:Its like a lottery
He was always going to get 2 weeks based on points. he would have finished with one if he hadnt been suspended before. it was stupid and very costly for him. Who knows, may even cost him a spot on the list. You argued it was soft but he had to go.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4273
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 45 times
- Been thanked: 235 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
silly yes !
but how much does dawes get for the dive !
There are players now who down down quicker than freddie mercury backstage at a queen concert !
but how much does dawes get for the dive !
There are players now who down down quicker than freddie mercury backstage at a queen concert !
In red white and black from 73
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18548
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1527 times
- Been thanked: 1877 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
have you gone off Simpkin? I thought you liked him.plugger66 wrote:bergsone wrote:Its like a lottery
He was always going to get 2 weeks based on points. he would have finished with one if he hadnt been suspended before. it was stupid and very costly for him. Who knows, may even cost him a spot on the list. You argued it was soft but he had to go.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 2900
- Joined: Mon 28 Apr 2008 4:56pm
- Location: victoria
- Has thanked: 260 times
- Been thanked: 111 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Would not have knocked over a granny,silly yes,cost a spot on list by someone taking a dive,that would be ridiciousplugger66 wrote:bergsone wrote:Its like a lottery
He was always going to get 2 weeks based on points. he would have finished with one if he hadnt been suspended before. it was stupid and very costly for him. Who knows, may even cost him a spot on the list. You argued it was soft but he had to go.
I don't see much difference in that compared to tummy punches,jumper punches etc.....its the luck of the draw
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9500
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 1207 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Embly gets the same for a far more dirty act. Stevie J gets two for a perfect bump shows the MRP is a joke.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
SaintPav wrote:have you gone off Simpkin? I thought you liked him.plugger66 wrote:bergsone wrote:Its like a lottery
He was always going to get 2 weeks based on points. he would have finished with one if he hadnt been suspended before. it was stupid and very costly for him. Who knows, may even cost him a spot on the list. You argued it was soft but he had to go.
I do. I certainly havent said ive gone off him. The fact is he has played 2 games this season and may not play again. That isnt a great record. He maybe safe due to age and that there are a few in front of him who will go but he is my no means safe. As for the hit i reckon he would be very disappointed in himself. for a sart it probably cost him about 8k and that is in the short term.
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
CURLY wrote:Embly gets the same for a far more dirty act. Stevie J gets two for a perfect bump shows the MRP is a joke.
If you reckon Steve J was the perfect bump then you should not be allowed to post again due to lack of credibility. All decisions look correct this week. Knowing the rules does help though.
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Heres a suggestion...dont swing a punch at anyones head 50m off the play..then the chances of you being suspended are greatly reduced
Yes Dawes crumpled like a pack of cards..but Tom had the option not to do it. Wasnt a block or a shepherd
Silly act that Id hope will be pointed out to him by the senior players. Gets back in the side and does that.
Yes Dawes crumpled like a pack of cards..but Tom had the option not to do it. Wasnt a block or a shepherd
Silly act that Id hope will be pointed out to him by the senior players. Gets back in the side and does that.
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18548
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1527 times
- Been thanked: 1877 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Good. he would have been good this week. I guess we don't want to win too many games though.plugger66 wrote:
I do. I certainly havent said ive gone off him. The fact is he has played 2 games this season and may not play again. That isnt a great record. He maybe safe due to age and that there are a few in front of him who will go but he is my no means safe. As for the hit i reckon he would be very disappointed in himself. for a sart it probably cost him about 8k and that is in the short term.
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9500
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 1207 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Stevie J's bump was a perfect bump yet to see any footage that suggests other wise.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Embly gets the same for a far more dirty act. Stevie J gets two for a perfect bump shows the MRP is a joke.
If you reckon Steve J was the perfect bump then you should not be allowed to post again due to lack of credibility. All decisions look correct this week. Knowing the rules does help though.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
CURLY wrote:Stevie J's bump was a perfect bump yet to see any footage that suggests other wise.plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Embly gets the same for a far more dirty act. Stevie J gets two for a perfect bump shows the MRP is a joke.
If you reckon Steve J was the perfect bump then you should not be allowed to post again due to lack of credibility. All decisions look correct this week. Knowing the rules does help though.
You should read the rule book. it would help you understand the game. the bump hit the other player in the head. makes it a bad bump. not sure what footage you saw but it wasnt the bump yesterday if you dont think it head the players head.
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9500
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 1207 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:Stevie J's bump was a perfect bump yet to see any footage that suggests other wise.plugger66 wrote: If you reckon Steve J was the perfect bump then you should not be allowed to post again due to lack of credibility. All decisions look correct this week. Knowing the rules does help though.
You should read the rule book. it would help you understand the game. the bump hit the other player in the head. makes it a bad bump. not sure what footage you saw but it wasnt the bump yesterday if you dont think it head the players head.
Please dont try and tell me you can say that clearly made contact with his head. His head got thrown back with the impact then hit the ground. Perfect bump play on no other option.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
CURLY wrote:plugger66 wrote:CURLY wrote:
Stevie J's bump was a perfect bump yet to see any footage that suggests other wise.
You should read the rule book. it would help you understand the game. the bump hit the other player in the head. makes it a bad bump. not sure what footage you saw but it wasnt the bump yesterday if you dont think it head the players head.
Please dont try and tell me you can say that clearly made contact with his head. His head got thrown back with the impact then hit the ground. Perfect bump play on no other option.
When you make up your mind you clearly dont watch vision with 2 eyes. His head was hit by the bump. 100% and to say otherwise means you are blind. Unless of course every single person who commented on it is wrong except you.
- Devilhead
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 8165
- Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
- Has thanked: 129 times
- Been thanked: 1134 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Hodge on Murphy??plugger66 wrote: You should read the rule book. it would help you understand the game. the bump hit the other player in the head. makes it a bad bump. not sure what footage you saw but it wasnt the bump yesterday if you dont think it head the players head.
Hodge on Henderson??
The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
-
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9500
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 131 times
- Been thanked: 1207 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Dont lie you cannot be 100% sure his shoulder hit his head there is no actual 100% proof.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Love Simpkin.
Was worth it for hitting Dawes.
Embley's brain explosion had to be worth 4.
p.s id love to see how simpkin went on jack this weekend.
Was worth it for hitting Dawes.
Embley's brain explosion had to be worth 4.
p.s id love to see how simpkin went on jack this weekend.
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Con Gorozidis wrote:Love Simpkin.
Was worth it for hitting Dawes.
Embley's brain explosion had to be worth 4.
p.s id love to see how simpkin went on jack this weekend.
So it was worth 2 games and about 8K to Tom and at the worst a delisting. its time people realsied there stupid things dont help anyone including the side. How it it worth it hitting dawes?
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
Ahh so its OK for Tom to get a couple so long as everyone else gets rubbed out too, preferably for longer.
High contact, low impact, intentional..how can anyone possibly argue with that
Would have been a one weeker but he has priors
High contact, low impact, intentional..how can anyone possibly argue with that
Would have been a one weeker but he has priors
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Tom Simpkin- 2 weeks
saint66au wrote:Ahh so its OK for Tom to get a couple so long as everyone else gets rubbed out too, preferably for longer.
High contact, low impact, intentional..how can anyone possibly argue with that
Would have been a one weeker but he has priors
On balance;
1 week for the Hit
1 week for the STUPIDITY
Yeah, they got it about right !!
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!