Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
matrix
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21475
Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 4 times

Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451778Post matrix »

have a red hot crack lads

go saints 8-)


mullet
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5109
Joined: Wed 04 Aug 2004 3:18pm
Has thanked: 12 times
Been thanked: 30 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451787Post mullet »

freo didnt look that good tonight, perhaps the heat from last week got to them. Hope the same happens to the injectors


happy feet
Club Player
Posts: 1831
Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
Has thanked: 226 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451789Post happy feet »

I don't think we will win tonight, but at least we are not the biggest drug cheats of all time. Essendon, you suck and deserve to get rubbed out for as long as possible. How is it tat Saad got 2 years for basically SFA yet the club involved with the most systematic doping program is still running its players around like nothing has happened. Absolute a..holes.


Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
ozrulestrace
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2358
Joined: Mon 09 Jun 2008 6:58pm
Location: East of Bentleigh

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451796Post ozrulestrace »

Hear hear, well said.


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451797Post BigMart »

Oh dear Jimmy

What an effort


Old Mate
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5624
Joined: Wed 15 Jun 2011 7:06pm

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451798Post Old Mate »

No one butchers the ball like Geary


mr six o'clock
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4262
Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
Has thanked: 43 times
Been thanked: 233 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451800Post mr six o'clock »

give that billings boy a cigar !


In red white and black from 73
User avatar
roskilde
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 7:32pm
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451801Post roskilde »

That's the benefit of a third draft pick, he could have passed responsibility to Nick, but instead he backed himself and nailed it. Good boy Jack! :)


This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf--
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451803Post joffaboy »

Eli, Dunstan, Billings, moist


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451805Post joffaboy »

happy feet wrote:I don't think we will win tonight, but at least we are not the biggest drug cheats of all time. Essendon, you suck and deserve to get rubbed out for as long as possible. How is it tat Saad got 2 years for basically SFA yet the club involved with the most systematic doping program is still running its players around like nothing has happened. Absolute a..holes.
Saad tested positive


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451806Post joffaboy »

Missed shot are killing us


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
happy feet
Club Player
Posts: 1831
Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
Has thanked: 226 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451807Post happy feet »

joffaboy wrote:
happy feet wrote:I don't think we will win tonight, but at least we are not the biggest drug cheats of all time. Essendon, you suck and deserve to get rubbed out for as long as possible. How is it tat Saad got 2 years for basically SFA yet the club involved with the most systematic doping program is still running its players around like nothing has happened. Absolute a..holes.
Saad tested positive
Yep, no dispute there Joffa. Just explain the rest of the joke for me please. Sorry Essendon are cheats they suck.


Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3500
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 446 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451808Post saintbob »

Great quarter by Billings,Dunstan and Stanley


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451809Post gringo »

Could they be any luckier with their goals. We work and score points and they seem to just arse them. Where is the karma?


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451811Post saintspremiers »

joffaboy wrote:Missed shot are killing us
Add to that arsie luck in front of goal for them.

P.S. Are you watching on telly with BM?


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451812Post joffaboy »

Cant explain happy feet, except it is harder to prove when no positive test. We all know they are the Lance Amstrongs of the AFL.

Reason I am watching on tv. I wont give drug cheats a cent of my money, or go to a drug cheating club game ever again.

1-6 FFS, they are kicking them out of their arse and we are missing some sitters.

Trying hard and we have some goodens in Billings, Dunstan, Bruce, Saunders and Eli.

Some talent to build on, especially we Mav and Acres to hopefully step up.

Stanley having a go.


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
User avatar
patto
Club Player
Posts: 116
Joined: Sat 17 May 2008 5:08pm
Location: Mornington

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451813Post patto »

happy feet wrote:
joffaboy wrote:
happy feet wrote:I don't think we will win tonight, but at least we are not the biggest drug cheats of all time. Essendon, you suck and deserve to get rubbed out for as long as possible. How is it tat Saad got 2 years for basically SFA yet the club involved with the most systematic doping program is still running its players around like nothing has happened. Absolute a..holes.
Saad tested positive
Yep, no dispute there Joffa. Just explain the rest of the joke for me please. Sorry Essendon are cheats they suck.
+1 It sickens me watching this cheating team still playing on with everything obviously just swept under the carpet now with nothing more to come from it. Give it another year or so and it will be business as usual like nothing ever happened in the first place...


BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451814Post BigMart »

Two huge turn overs

The Riewoldt 1 on 3 mark on the Wing... 50/50 free kick... Turn over goal

Jimmy Gwilt stupidity at 50m turn over goal

Gwilt is currently WOG... 3 mistakes... All costly

Ryder out of the ruck goal... Absolutely criminal to allow that iD50


Sobraz
SS Life Member
Posts: 3399
Joined: Thu 29 Mar 2007 1:06pm
Has thanked: 2 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451815Post Sobraz »

Most fortuitous qtr of football I've seen in a long time.. You'd think the footy gods would be against them.. Unfortunately the jokes on us..


StPeter
Club Player
Posts: 1215
Joined: Thu 22 Jun 2006 4:03pm
Location: StKilda East
Has thanked: 45 times
Been thanked: 216 times
Contact:

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451818Post StPeter »

What a frustrating quarter. At least 2 lucky bounce goals to them.

Some frustrating umpiring decisions, and bad kicking and decision making in attack. We should have been ahead at quarter time.
Last edited by StPeter on Sat 19 Apr 2014 9:19pm, edited 1 time in total.


joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451819Post joffaboy »

BigMart wrote:Two huge turn overs

The Riewoldt 1 on 3 mark on the Wing... 50/50 free kick... Turn over goal

Jimmy Gwilt stupidity at 50m turn over goal

Gwilt is currently WOG... 3 mistakes... All costly

Ryder out of the ruck goal... Absolutely criminal to allow that iD50
Ever got anything positive to say?

Also the Ryder goal was an absolute fluke. Kick it out of his arse


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
User avatar
roskilde
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 7:32pm
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451822Post roskilde »

Mr Reiwoldt you are a star. Great assist from Jimmy Webster. Saints 18-30 Dees


This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf--
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.
User avatar
roskilde
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2409
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 7:32pm
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 336 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451823Post roskilde »

Can we just keep this thread to discussions of the game and not get into the niggly crap joff?

If you don't like what BM says, put him on ignore.


This was my father's belief
And this is also mine:
Let the corn be all one sheaf--
And the grapes be all one vine,
Ere our children's teeth are set on edge
By bitter bread and wine.
happy feet
Club Player
Posts: 1831
Joined: Wed 27 Feb 2008 7:27pm
Has thanked: 226 times
Been thanked: 347 times

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451824Post happy feet »

joffaboy wrote:Cant explain happy feet, except it is harder to prove when no positive test. We all know they are the Lance Amstrongs of the AFL.

Reason I am watching on tv. I wont give drug cheats a cent of my money, or go to a drug cheating club game ever again.

1-6 FFS, they are kicking them out of their arse and we are missing some sitters.

Trying hard and we have some goodens in Billings, Dunstan, Bruce, Saunders and Eli.

Some talent to build on, especially we Mav and Acres to hopefully step up.

Stanley having a go.
Thanks Bud, at least in NSW without Foxtel, I don't have to watch. I just pray they will go down hard, and soon too.


Rugby League would have to be the stupidest, most moronic and over rated game of all time.
joffaboy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 20200
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:57pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Match Thread: Saints v Bombers

Post: # 1451825Post joffaboy »

roskilde wrote:Can we just keep this thread to discussions of the game and not get into the niggly crap joff?

If you don't like what BM says, put him on ignore.
Cool will do


Lance or James??

There comes a point in every man's life when he has to say, "Enough is enough." For me, that time is now. I have been dealing with claims that I cheated and had an unfair advantage in <redacted>. Over the past three years, I have been subjected to a <redacted>investigation followed by <redacted> witch hunt. The toll this has taken on my family, and my work for <redacted>and on me leads me to where I am today – finished with this nonsense. (Oops just got a spontaneous errection <unredacted>)
Post Reply