What a liabilty Saad is

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:32pm

Why did they redraft him. No football ability at all.bloody useless.

dragit · Post: # 1543092Post **dragit** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:41pm

He hasn't worked as the sub in the past either, I don't think it suits him at all, finds it hard to get into the game...

matrix · Post: # 1543096Post **matrix** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:42pm

agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:42pm

dragit wrote:He hasn't worked as the sub in the past either, I don't think it suits him at all, finds it hard to get into the game...

Get serious he is so one sided it's embarrassing.

LTN16 · Post: # 1543113Post **LTN16** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:47pm

matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo

Only cost a rookie pick..

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:50pm

LTN16 wrote:
matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo
Only cost a rookie pick..

Waste of a rookie pick

LTN16 · Post: # 1543124Post **LTN16** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:51pm

magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo
Only cost a rookie pick..
Waste of a rookie pick

Disagree

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:52pm

LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo
Only cost a rookie pick..
Waste of a rookie pick
Disagree

What are the positives?

dragit · Post: # 1543129Post **dragit** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:53pm

He's a pretty easy target, but give him a kick if it makes you feel better.

I don't think this loss is his fault after playing for 40 mins.

I'm sure he'll get a spell though if we have anyone to bring in.

RW&B · Post: # 1543134Post **RW&B** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:55pm

Minchington.

sasaint · Post: # 1543137Post **sasaint** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:56pm

Obvious that today we should have brought in Michington. Bad selection.

LTN16 · Post: # 1543138Post **LTN16** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:57pm

magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo
Only cost a rookie pick..
Waste of a rookie pick
Disagree
What are the positives?

Your making that decision on what? One game?

Con Gorozidis · Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:57pm

Saad never touched the ball in 2013.
2014-Ban
2015 pre-season - never touched the ball
2015 season - hardly touched the ball

Why do we persist with him and why does the coach lie and say he picks on form and doesn't have favourites.

The Minch had a goal an 8 tackles last week in the VFL but never gets any opportunities (oh play him against Hawthorn) while Saad gets chance after chance after chance and can't get near the ball against the weakest team.

Wed be much better with Mitch Brown than Saad as a rookie. Not sure why we picked him back up.

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:57pm

He doesn't give anything at all. Wouldn't get a game with any other club. Not his fault we lost but we play one down with him in the side.

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:58pm

LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo
Only cost a rookie pick..
Waste of a rookie pick
Disagree
What are the positives?
Your making that decision on what? One game?

On watching him for 2 and half years.

Old Mate · Post: # 1543146Post **Old Mate** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 2:58pm

Too one dimensional. Weak in the contest. Tries to be too tricky. Not s football player.

Con Gorozidis · Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:00pm

LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo
Only cost a rookie pick..
Waste of a rookie pick
Disagree
What are the positives?
Your making that decision on what? One game?

3 games this year
all of the 2013 season
all of the 2015 pre season

LTN16 · Post: # 1543158Post **LTN16** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:01pm

magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo
Only cost a rookie pick..
Waste of a rookie pick
Disagree
What are the positives?
Your making that decision on what? One game?
On watching him for 2 and half years.

Yeah all his fault that we lost today.. Everyone else played pretty good

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:02pm

The most apt description of Saad is he is the most insipid footballer on our list

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:03pm

LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:
LTN16 wrote:
matrix wrote:agree with mag
shouldnt of taken him back imo
Only cost a rookie pick..
Waste of a rookie pick
Disagree
What are the positives?
Your making that decision on what? One game?
On watching him for 2 and half years.
Yeah all his fault that we lost today.. Everyone else played pretty good

Cmon what the hell has he done this year?

Give me ONE thing.

ShanghaiSaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:06pm

magnifisaint wrote:Why did they redraft him. No football ability at all.bloody useless.

was thinking about starting an exact thread. bar the intercepion he made hat lead to a goal..... guy is basically useless. guy crums a few quick soccer goals but offers little more.

cant win a clearance cant lead cant doing anything constructive under pressure.... time is up for him OUT Saad INN Minch sorry to be so harsh

Old Mate · Post: # 1543177Post **Old Mate** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:08pm

ShanghaiSaint wrote:
magnifisaint wrote:Why did they redraft him. No football ability at all.bloody useless.
was thinking about starting an exact thread. bar the intercepion he made hat lead to a goal..... guy is basically useless. guy crums a few quick soccer goals but offers little more.

cant win a clearance cant lead can doing anything constructive under pressure.... time is up for him OUT Saad INN Minch

Summed it up perfectly. Agree re Minch

Devilhead · Post: # 1543180Post **Devilhead** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:09pm

As much as i agree with this thread - Saad is not the problem - Steven on half a mill is - B grade mid giving D grade performances

magnifisaint · Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:10pm

I'm glad it's not just me that thinks this. Sometimes you can defend the indefensible.

Sobraz · Post: # 1543188Post **Sobraz** » Sat 25 Apr 2015 3:12pm

Actually plays soccer on the football field.

What a liabilty Saad is

What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is

Re: What a liabilty Saad is