Draft Assessment

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
SuperDuper
Club Player
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591545Post SuperDuper »

Well, those wanting best available mid... that is what we took.. according to our recruiters ratings of players...
So.. you should be happy

Those wanting good kicks... that is what we got... Rice and White rated very good kicks and Gresham a good user of the footy

Those wanting speed, we also got that in White and to an extent Gresham who has some dash

So... looks good, although we wont know for a few years


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591550Post Con Gorozidis »

SuperDuper wrote:Well, those wanting best available mid... that is what we took.. according to our recruiters ratings of players...
So.. you should be happy

Those wanting good kicks... that is what we got... Rice and White rated very good kicks and Gresham a good user of the footy

Those wanting speed, we also got that in White and to an extent Gresham who has some dash

So... looks good, although we wont know for a few years
Pleasing. Added three mids/runners. Rice falling down allowed us to take White so really that was a bonus for us. Thumbs up. But I guess 17 other clubs are probably saying similar things.


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591565Post Bluthy »

Ahmeet Bains just spoke

Gresham - captain Northern knights - wins his own footy, can play forward, speed and skill
White - local boy from berwick, back flanker, elite kick, bit of height
Rice - happy to have a father son.
3 picks in rookie draft - one will be Saunders

You could see Gresham and Billings swapping as forward/midfielder to ease their loads on ball and give us an unpredictability (Gresham is a very good shot on goal apparently).

White seems a bit like McKenzie in a rebounding back role. Pressure rise on the likes of Savage, Webster, Wright even Roberton. You are going to need to bring it to get a spot in our premiership back 7.

Rice seems a big unknown to me as one coach thought he would only be a rookie before he seemed to really commit himself. But hasn't cost us much and nice to get a bit of father son action. Rebounding back or maybe can work himself into our midfield? Will be interesting to see what direction he develops

I don't feel super excited over this year's draft but then you remember we also got Carlisle and Freeman (although cost us next years pick) and you can't help but think we've done well.


SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591566Post SMS »

we rigged it beautifully. Rice and White best mates ... Rice just happened to run a "terrible" beep?? lol
I think we played em there. Well done saints.

A+ draft again. Filling the needs of speed with TOUGH, elite kicking and VIC boys. LOVE IT!


SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591568Post SMS »

ANYONE have footage of Brandon WHITE?


SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591572Post SMS »

Also Ryhs, Tucker or Balic have ALL gone to interstate teams. We ever need em back simply get em later ... but we have all those spots and better players I them. Wouldn't mind Tucker ... he'll come back to us.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591576Post Con Gorozidis »

It is a numbers game and we are following the Pelchen model. Add another top 10 pick next year and we have the makings of a good list. Will be some hits and misses along the way but our list looks well balanced imo.


SuperDuper
Club Player
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591586Post SuperDuper »

SMS wrote:ANYONE have footage of Brandon WHITE?
go to saints.com.au
looks like a GUN!!
I know it is only highlights but boy, it got me excited.. really top shelf package


User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591590Post WinnersOnly »

Draft score 70/100.

Wouldnt think any of the 3 taken tonight will play senior footy next year, unless Gresham can surpass Lonie as a small forward....

I cant understand why we keep taking small/medium defenders hoping they will turn into midfielders. Our list balance is horendous in terms of natural ball winning midfielders. But they are the experts so lets hope they get it right!


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
User avatar
Verdun66
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2152
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 6:46am
Location: Dubai, UAE
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 2 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591593Post Verdun66 »

I'm happy. Brandon White was tipped on BF by a couple of people a few months back. Gresham has been talked in the 10-15 area all season, and we knew about Rice. Matho and Tucker fell well back, and so it wasn't just us ignoring them. Pace, courage, good kicks, natural footballers. Carlisle and Freeman as well. Hopefully an 'under the radar' gun in the rookie draft would round things off nicely.


R. Harvey 3 votes!
Club Player
Posts: 552
Joined: Mon 04 Aug 2008 7:46pm
Been thanked: 7 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591595Post R. Harvey 3 votes! »

I am just happy that we have picked footballers that can actually kick. All three of those players seemed to be great kicks of the footy.
Endurance and running ability can be worked on and built over time, but natural football ability can't be trained and these days you need to hit targets, turning the ball over just kills ya, not to mention our horrendous goal kicking!


When Harvey played his first game in 1988, I was a 12yo wearing short pants and struggling with my readin', writin' and 'rithmetic in grade eight. Now, I'm a father of three and a retired AFL player. And he's still going. Amazing! - Michael Voss
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7752
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 202 times
Been thanked: 545 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591596Post magnifisaint »

WinnersOnly wrote:Draft score 70/100.

Wouldnt think any of the 3 taken tonight will play senior footy next year, unless Gresham can surpass Lonie as a small forward....

I cant understand why we keep taking small/medium defenders hoping they will turn into midfielders. Our list balance is horendous in terms of natural ball winning midfielders. But they are the experts so lets hope they get it right!
you wouldn't mind a Luke Shuey or Lachie Neale?


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591597Post Con Gorozidis »

WinnersOnly wrote:Draft score 70/100.

Wouldnt think any of the 3 taken tonight will play senior footy next year, unless Gresham can surpass Lonie as a small forward....

I cant understand why we keep taking small/medium defenders hoping they will turn into midfielders. Our list balance is horendous in terms of natural ball winning midfielders. But they are the experts so lets hope they get it right!
Out of interest what is a 'natural ball winning midfielder'? It sounds to me like you have been glugging on the Mathieson Kool Aid. Gresham averages much more ball then Mathieson AND he can kick, isnt bog slow and can run all day.
Last edited by Con Gorozidis on Wed 25 Nov 2015 12:34am, edited 1 time in total.


SuperDuper
Club Player
Posts: 1302
Joined: Sun 25 Mar 2012 9:45pm
Has thanked: 24 times
Been thanked: 97 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591598Post SuperDuper »

there are claims on BF that we got no. 7 (Gresham) and 14 (White) on our draft board

Explaining why the saints crew were pretty pumped...

Source?... the guy was at the draft hanging around the saints table and Finnis flashed his mobile with the list on it when the White pick was coming up.... he is not claiming Finnis leaked anything until that last second... so seems credible

said the only other name he noticed was Ah Chee at 13


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591599Post Con Gorozidis »

I guess it comes to down performance.

If we havent made the top 8 by 2018 then I think we can unleash the vitriole on the club because that means the recruiters have been rubbish. Noone should be spared. But I think we still give them another two full seasons to develop. Guys like Ross, Dunstan, Acres, Membrey, Billings, Freeman, Wright, Murdoch, Minchington, Longer need to start standing up in 2016. The apprenticeship/mollycoddling is over for 3-5 year players.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591604Post Con Gorozidis »

Hate to say it but Melbourne look the big improvers. Hogan, Brayshaw, Petracca, Weideman, Oliver, Salem, Tyson, Viney. No longer easy beats. Sets them up nicely. Lions, Freo, Blues also big winners imo. Freo finished 3rd but still managed to walk away with Bennell, Tucker & Balic. Fair consolation after missing out on McCarthy.


Long Term Injury
Club Player
Posts: 139
Joined: Wed 12 Aug 2015 2:19am
Been thanked: 3 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591608Post Long Term Injury »

Agree completely, the Dees look like they have a list chock full of talent. Lets just hope that they do what they have seemed to do over the last 5 years and they fail to develop. But yeah, that is on paper (and so far only on paper) a very talented young list. But I remember when we were rising with Geelong mid last decade and thought we had a lot better list than them, so I aint no judge!


ripplug66
Club Player
Posts: 1452
Joined: Fri 25 Sep 2015 10:35am

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591618Post ripplug66 »

WinnersOnly wrote:Draft score 70/100.

Wouldnt think any of the 3 taken tonight will play senior footy next year, unless Gresham can surpass Lonie as a small forward....

I cant understand why we keep taking small/medium defenders hoping they will turn into midfielders. Our list balance is horendous in terms of natural ball winning midfielders. But they are the experts so lets hope they get it right!

Sounds like it should be 40 out of 100. Why do people feel the need to look at the negatives before these guys even have a kick in anger. By the way can you tell us your draft picks after the event and we will see how they go in the future 10 years? Pretty sure our first pick is a natural mid and I'm also pretty sure mamy HBF end up in the midfield especially those who occasionally play there anyway. Also good kicking ball winning HBF seem important to the Hawks. So important that the Hawks occasionally use Hodge as that person.


cwrcyn
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4162
Joined: Fri 15 Sep 2006 10:35am
Location: earth
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 1348 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591644Post cwrcyn »

It seems that between picks 15 and 30 there wasn't much difference in the rating of the talent. Historically, in this range of picks about a third of the players are busts, so I don't expect it to be much different this year. Look at last year, with Lonie going in the 40s and Sinclair going as a rookie. All the speculation on how good these players are is just that, and every year we have people on here who rave about players and criticise our recruiters for not selecting them. And then, as it turns out, most of these players eventually amount to nothing much at all. So, we'll just have to wait and see. We didn't get a highly ranked slider like Goddard this year, who some had rated as being in the best 7 players in his draft. As usual, the proof is in the pudding, and all the speculation in the world guarantees you nothing. From the highlight packages a couple of years ago I thought Saunders looked the pick of our crop and I thought Luke Dunstan had nothing going for him. Those highlight packages can be very deceptive (Spencer White, anyone?).

We'll get a better understanding during the pre-season competition and beyond. Then we can start making judgements on our recruiters


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30058
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 704 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591648Post saintsRrising »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Hate to say it but Melbourne look the big improvers. Hogan, Brayshaw, Petracca, Weideman, Oliver, Salem, Tyson, Viney. No longer easy beats. Sets them up nicely. Lions, Freo, Blues also big winners imo. Freo finished 3rd but still managed to walk away with Bennell, Tucker & Balic. Fair consolation after missing out on McCarthy.
Yes after years of squandering, the Dees the last two drafts have really nailed their picks. This on some early acqusitions like Hogan and Viney sees them now very well set up.

Their deal to get lower this years was also superbly done. Theu now havea lot of really good cattle.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591652Post WinnersOnly »

Con I probably havent seen enough of Gresham to get excited. I watched him in the Under 18 comp and his highlights packages and IMO I didnt see any AFL transferable qualities. Obviously I was wrong as all the experts suggest otherwise and I was wrong again with where Mathieson should sit. Time will tell I suppose but it was only my supposition right or wrong!

As good a player as our recruiters think White is at #40 in an supposed shallow draft - dont we have numerous other players who play that medium half back role - Robertson, Webster, Savage, Geary, Wright, Murdoch. How may do we need?
Last edited by WinnersOnly on Wed 25 Nov 2015 3:36pm, edited 3 times in total.


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
Beno88
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2242
Joined: Tue 10 Jul 2007 11:14am
Location: Bentleigh East
Has thanked: 265 times
Been thanked: 536 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591657Post Beno88 »

saintsRrising wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Hate to say it but Melbourne look the big improvers. Hogan, Brayshaw, Petracca, Weideman, Oliver, Salem, Tyson, Viney. No longer easy beats. Sets them up nicely. Lions, Freo, Blues also big winners imo. Freo finished 3rd but still managed to walk away with Bennell, Tucker & Balic. Fair consolation after missing out on McCarthy.
Yes after years of squandering, the Dees the last two drafts have really nailed their picks. This on some early acqusitions like Hogan and Viney sees them now very well set up.

Their deal to get lower this years was also superbly done. Theu now havea lot of really good cattle.
They looked like turning the corner when Scully and Trengove were picked up too. They're as far away from finals as we are, if not further.


saintbob
SS Life Member
Posts: 3500
Joined: Wed 21 May 2008 8:51pm
Location: Tassie
Has thanked: 446 times
Been thanked: 286 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591664Post saintbob »

I just hope they're as good as our recruiters believe they will be!!

Gresham - sounds like a real player

White - I reckon they'll try and make him a midfielder

Rice - I really hope he turns out a good player, and I seriously hope he was told to slacken off at the special screening last week because his results weren't very flattering.


SMS
Club Player
Posts: 1233
Joined: Fri 04 Nov 2011 3:00pm
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 62 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591666Post SMS »

Draft period
100/100
Carlisle
Freeman
Gresham
White
Rice
We needed speed. CHECK. We wanted to keep our focus of elite kicking. CHECK. toughness. CHECK. Leadership. CHECK.

Absolute stoked!! brandon White wouldve gone top 20 had he not been ill for major scout session and injured during first stages. Cannot believe how stupid recruiters are. HAVE A LOOK AT HIM!! 189cm and sprints like carl lewis in 1989. kicks like birchall he better than bonner and much better peron and attitude .. LOCAL boy!
we are buildinjhg a tough, skilled TEAM. we are doing so well. Team chemistry is high, toughness is huge and skill is elite.


stkfc1
Club Player
Posts: 1351
Joined: Sat 06 Oct 2007 2:42pm
Has thanked: 240 times
Been thanked: 382 times

Re: Draft Assessment

Post: # 1591671Post stkfc1 »

Beno88 wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:Hate to say it but Melbourne look the big improvers. Hogan, Brayshaw, Petracca, Weideman, Oliver, Salem, Tyson, Viney. No longer easy beats. Sets them up nicely. Lions, Freo, Blues also big winners imo. Freo finished 3rd but still managed to walk away with Bennell, Tucker & Balic. Fair consolation after missing out on McCarthy.
Yes after years of squandering, the Dees the last two drafts have really nailed their picks. This on some early acqusitions like Hogan and Viney sees them now very well set up.

Their deal to get lower this years was also superbly done. Theu now havea lot of really good cattle.
They looked like turning the corner when Scully and Trengove were picked up too. They're as far away from finals as we are, if not further.
Problem for Dees is if Hogan falls over, who kicks their goals? Granted he had a great season and lucky with injuries but he's injury prone and unlikely to get through a whole season. Back problems rarely completely disappear. They do have a great mid field coming through but I'd take our forward line any day of the week.


Post Reply