King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
Rocket
Club Player
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon 18 Jul 2005 11:04am
Been thanked: 59 times

King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829048Post Rocket »

You would think now that Ben King has re-signed at GC that we now got to sign up Bruce for 1-3 years extra ?

With McCartin in limbo it leaves Max King, Membrey with Marshall / Ryder.

Or do we bite bullet for Howard ? Don’t know enough about this bloke.


Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829051Post Secret Kiel »

Nup


Image
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18491
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1515 times
Been thanked: 1868 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829052Post SaintPav »

Does this really need a separate thread?


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
User avatar
Dis Believer
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5079
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:42pm
Location: The terraces at Moorabbin, in the pouring rain.......
Has thanked: 239 times
Been thanked: 270 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829053Post Dis Believer »

Rocket wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 10:17am You would think now that Ben King has re-signed at GC that we now got to sign up Bruce for 1-3 years extra ?

With McCartin in limbo it leaves Max King, Membrey with Marshall / Ryder.

Or do we bite bullet for Howard ? Don’t know enough about this bloke.
Would think Howard in and Battle back forward if needed, especially with Roberton looking like getting back on the park....


The heavy metal artist formerly known as True Believer!
IF you look around the room and can't identify who the sucker is, then it's probably you!
User avatar
Joffa Burns
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7081
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 5:48pm
Has thanked: 1871 times
Been thanked: 1570 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829058Post Joffa Burns »

I think its pretty clear that Marshall will play KPP forward and Ryder as no.1 ruck.
With Howard and Carslile as KPP defenders battle may play the swingman role.

A friend suggested PA are interested in Wilkie being the steak knives in the Howard deal, I have no idea if correct or not.


Proudly assuming the title of forum Oracle and serving as the inaugural Saintsational ‘weak as piss brigade’ President.
User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10335
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 682 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829061Post desertsaint »

be nice to have a chf. pretty important position.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
Sainternist
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11291
Joined: Thu 11 Mar 2004 12:57am
Location: South of Heaven
Has thanked: 1285 times
Been thanked: 433 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829064Post Sainternist »

The idea of trading Bruce was to restructure our forward line in accomodating for Max King, not Ben King!!


Curb your enthusiasm - you’re a St.Kilda supporter!!
Image
User avatar
desertsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10335
Joined: Sun 27 Apr 2008 2:02pm
Location: out there
Has thanked: 183 times
Been thanked: 682 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829076Post desertsaint »

Sainternist wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 12:20pm The idea of trading Bruce was to restructure our forward line in accomodating for Max King, not Ben King!!
correct but again, who plays chf? we have no one that is a good fit next season.
membrey would be solution, but not ideal, battle is shaping as a very good defender and would be learning on the job, not ideal without a good onfield mentor, roma the same.


"The starting point of all achievement is desire. "
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30058
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 704 times
Been thanked: 1219 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829082Post saintsRrising »

Sainternist wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 12:20pm The idea of trading Bruce was to restructure our forward line in accomodating for Max King, not Ben King!!

Not so sure about that.

I think Bruce this year was so that we did not need to use our 2020 first in any trades to get some key targets in (which has turned out to be Hill, Howard and Jones) so that we could use it in a possible Ben King Trade.

Bruce amd Max along with Membrey can all easily play in the one forward line. King at FF, Bruce the roaming CHF and Membrey as the ideal "third tall".


If the thought to move on Bruce for restructuring, it would have been due to wanting to play two genuine rucks (ie Marshall and Ryder) in the one team, with the compromise that one plays as forward when the other is rucking.


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
Devilhead
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8041
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 11:56pm
Has thanked: 125 times
Been thanked: 1097 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829281Post Devilhead »

Joffa Burns wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 11:29am I think its pretty clear that Marshall will play KPP forward and Ryder as no.1 ruck.
With Howard and Carslile as KPP defenders battle may play the swingman role.

A friend suggested PA are interested in Wilkie being the steak knives in the Howard deal, I have no idea if correct or not.
Wilkie as steak knives in deal for a Port reserves player :lol:


The Devil makes work for idle hands!!!
User avatar
Enrico_Misso
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11662
Joined: Tue 13 Jun 2006 12:11am
Location: Moorabbin Chapter of The Royal Society of Hagiographers
Has thanked: 315 times
Been thanked: 720 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829282Post Enrico_Misso »

desertsaint wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 1:01pm
Sainternist wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 12:20pm The idea of trading Bruce was to restructure our forward line in accomodating for Max King, not Ben King!!
correct but again, who plays chf? we have no one that is a good fit next season.
membrey would be solution, but not ideal, battle is shaping as a very good defender and would be learning on the job, not ideal without a good onfield mentor, roma the same.
Paddy plays a stay at home chf role - anchored at true chf in his spherical bubble suit.


The rest of Australia can wander mask-free, socialise, eat out, no curfews, no zoning, no police rings of steel, no illogical inconsistent rules. 
They can even WATCH LIVE FOOTY!
Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829286Post Secret Kiel »

Joffa Burns wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 11:29am I think its pretty clear that Marshall will play KPP forward and Ryder as no.1 ruck.
With Howard and Carslile as KPP defenders battle may play the swingman role.

A friend suggested PA are interested in Wilkie being the steak knives in the Howard deal, I have no idea if correct or not.
Yeah but Wilkie would be one of those real nice expensive steak knives, the one with the mahogany timber handles and blades cut from Japanese samurai sword steel.


Image
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1271
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829287Post groupie1 »

A contract is a guarantee. Ben King is not off the table at all. Manager advised him to extend for the financial guarantee. He can still be traded.


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
remboy
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2127
Joined: Fri 22 Jul 2005 9:27am
Location: Rockville
Has thanked: 544 times
Been thanked: 175 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829288Post remboy »

groupie1 wrote: Tue 15 Oct 2019 5:53am A contract is a guarantee. Ben King is not off the table at all. Manager advised him to extend for the financial guarantee. He can still be traded.
100% agree. At the end of next season Ben King will be just as available as ever. All the new contract does is give him a big pay rise and Gold Coast gets a bit bit more bargaining power.


Opinions are like arseholes, everybody's got one.
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1271
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829289Post groupie1 »

remboy wrote: Tue 15 Oct 2019 6:44am
groupie1 wrote: Tue 15 Oct 2019 5:53am A contract is a guarantee. Ben King is not off the table at all. Manager advised him to extend for the financial guarantee. He can still be traded.
100% agree. At the end of next season Ben King will be just as available as ever. All the new contract does is give him a big pay rise and Gold Coast gets a bit bit more bargaining power.
Thanks mate. It's nice to post here and not get ridiculed... let alone be agreed with!


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
User avatar
Spinner
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8502
Joined: Sat 02 Dec 2006 3:40pm
Location: Victoria
Has thanked: 185 times
Been thanked: 133 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829290Post Spinner »

Once we get Hill, Howard and Ryder completed we can hold out for Bruce to the very end. Would be interesting to see how it falls.

Dogs would need to pony up more than 32 you would think.


User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18491
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1515 times
Been thanked: 1868 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829293Post SaintPav »

True Believer wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 10:30am
Rocket wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 10:17am You would think now that Ben King has re-signed at GC that we now got to sign up Bruce for 1-3 years extra ?

With McCartin in limbo it leaves Max King, Membrey with Marshall / Ryder.

Or do we bite bullet for Howard ? Don’t know enough about this bloke.
Would think Howard in and Battle back forward if needed, especially with Roberton looking like getting back on the park....
Sounds nice in theory but Battle is not a crash and bash forward like Bruce. He also found his place in the backline and was playing well there before Jake came back into the team.

Bruce wasn't the KP player we needed to cut loose and I think we are going to regret letting him go, big time.


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829315Post To the top »

Acknowledging that my assessments of what players bring to the table differs significantly from the assessments of others on here, I venture that Marshall as a key forward will be a turning point with his skill set and athleticism

Ryder will ruck with occasional support from Marshall - and we still require ruck support behind those 2 (a late Pick from a State League?)

Membrey as the “third tall” will round out a dangerous attack - with Gresham, Billings and Long in support


longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829317Post longtimesaint »

Taking Marshall out of the ruck is madness as he is shaping as another Grundy.
Playing Ryder as the number one ruck will damage our clearances as he is no longer very athletic.


One year will be our year
Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829320Post Secret Kiel »

longtimesaint wrote: Tue 15 Oct 2019 10:20am Taking Marshall out of the ruck is madness as he is shaping as another Grundy.
Playing Ryder as the number one ruck will damage our clearances as he is no longer very athletic.
Surely the plan is for Ryder to be the mentor/backup to RoMa and also the spare forward option to replace Bruce structurally while Max King develops and tries to establish himself in the team.


Image
Rocket
Club Player
Posts: 374
Joined: Mon 18 Jul 2005 11:04am
Been thanked: 59 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829324Post Rocket »

What are we hearing re Bruce deal ? Not a lot in media.

Would like to keep ....dangerous forward line with him, King, Membrey and perhaps Battle.


Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829328Post Secret Kiel »

Rocket wrote: Tue 15 Oct 2019 10:57am What are we hearing re Bruce deal ? Not a lot in media.

Would like to keep ....dangerous forward line with him, King, Membrey and perhaps Battle.
Battle is now forever a backline player, more chance of Carlise being moved forward especially if Dougal makes a case as the Carlisle replacement down back.

Bruce is replaced by Ryder in the short term.


Image
User avatar
groupie1
Club Player
Posts: 1271
Joined: Sun 18 Jun 2006 4:21am
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 52 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829329Post groupie1 »

To the top wrote: Tue 15 Oct 2019 10:01am Acknowledging that my assessments of what players bring to the table differs significantly from the assessments of others on here, I venture that Marshall as a key forward will be a turning point with his skill set and athleticism

Ryder will ruck with occasional support from Marshall - and we still require ruck support behind those 2 (a late Pick from a State League?)

Membrey as the “third tall” will round out a dangerous attack - with Gresham, Billings and Long in support
I agree with Membrey being able to play 3rd forward will be more beneficial to us than we think. He's rarely had that opportunity and he will monster any 3rd defender in the comp one-on-one.


Gordon Fode couldda been Plugga
Secret Kiel
Club Player
Posts: 1789
Joined: Thu 10 Oct 2019 12:19pm
Has thanked: 258 times
Been thanked: 211 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829336Post Secret Kiel »

groupie1 wrote: Tue 15 Oct 2019 11:57am
To the top wrote: Tue 15 Oct 2019 10:01am Acknowledging that my assessments of what players bring to the table differs significantly from the assessments of others on here, I venture that Marshall as a key forward will be a turning point with his skill set and athleticism

Ryder will ruck with occasional support from Marshall - and we still require ruck support behind those 2 (a late Pick from a State League?)

Membrey as the “third tall” will round out a dangerous attack - with Gresham, Billings and Long in support
I agree with Membrey being able to play 3rd forward will be more beneficial to us than we think. He's rarely had that opportunity and he will monster any 3rd defender in the comp one-on-one.
The fact RoMo could be that versatile, i.e. a full time forward that rotates in the ruck or the other way around is a positive either way in my book.

Like a few other soldiers who have desperately been battling manfully for the past few seasons while waiting for the cavalry to arrive, I suspect Members is jumping out of skin to take the field in 2020. He will surely benefit, he jumps at the ball and marks it at the apex like the old number 12.


Image
kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Re: King signs at GC = Bruce stays ?

Post: # 1829656Post kalsaint »

Rocket wrote: Mon 14 Oct 2019 10:17am You would think now that Ben King has re-signed at GC that we now got to sign up Bruce for 1-3 years extra ?

With McCartin in limbo it leaves Max King, Membrey with Marshall / Ryder.

Or do we bite bullet for Howard ? Don’t know enough about this bloke.
Howard at centre half back and Battle back at CHF. He has the leading, marking and long kicking attributes needed for the role and would have learnt a few forwards tricks while back this year.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
Post Reply