Im confused in amongst all the ego - nomics I have no idea whose beend delisted, elevated or pending.... would dearly appreciate a PM from someone in the know....is there anyone? cheers i could tell you....and if you were someone else.....i would.... :wink: :wink: :lol: :lol: someone else already h...

Great coach. Why? What is that based on? When I look at Eade's record (apart from year 1), I see nothing but mediocrity. Agree - blatantly overrated coach. Hailed as tactically brilliant, but has no consistent record of success over the years he has coached. Teams he coaches always seem to lack alt...

Saints Premiers 2006 wrote:oh i thought you were talking about teflon...

Who are you....no really......who are you?

Im confused in amongst all the ego - nomics I have no idea whose beend delisted, elevated or pending....

would dearly appreciate a PM from someone in the know....is there anyone?

cheers

we want Grant the messiah......er.....not...

Must say tis nice to see a PLAN start to take shape.

Well done Ross.

Your turn Westonhouse?

great post reiwoldting.

Scoop wrote:he is large....but not in the sense of a sheedy or someone like that.

Sorry for being a pain, but I really can't say any more....just got a bit of mail...may be way off....

cheers scoop.....appreciate it.

Scoop wrote:There is another name that could surprise some.....time will tell.

large name scoop?????

give us a hint...

can not believe the cr@p directed at Jones - his first half of the season priot to the collarbone was very good I thought - NO hes no Aussie Jones in the delivery stakes BUT hes not as bad as Andrew Thompson for mine either. he found the footy AND could run the lines with some true pace??? He got in...

Calling MSG to this thread. Your input would be interesting, I believe. Most were saying that this year would be a big clearout, after Lyon got a chance to assess our list in full, but not THIS big. However, it's clear that Lyon's strategy involves filling depth holes with AFL footballers, and gett...

Brooks has shown nothing in 5 years evertonfc. With Rix you know what you are going to get every week at AFL level or VFL level. With Brooks, it is a question mark. On the minimum wage, Rix's reliability in a physical and mental sense mean he gets the nod. Plus he played 17-odd games for us this ye...

hoping the cats would panic and bend over backwards to try to keep him. it worked imo we had our eyes on king the whole time. can play and 28 is a mere pup for a ruckman. plus he was preferred to blake in their premiership side. best thing about this is it frees up kosi to play ff. yeah they really...

the fact is, our ruck stocks are better with King on our list than without so it is a very good pick-up for us thats about it in a nutshell and I was panicking they might look at Richards who IS a cabbage. Good work by Lyon and Co. IMO the only way they could have gone better re: rucks is to get Wo...

Still getting over it gazrat :lol: Pick the GT lovers a mile away, who needs a ruckman right RL will develope a young ruckman but until then we can thank GT for the rucks we are getting now because we have not had one coming through since spider left, sorry i forgot about Brooks my mistake what pic...

Gardiners feets the only thing of interest here... To me hes the X factor - can go fwd and monster in the ruck...King in a support role for mine...... Lets hope we havent given Gardiner a nice 2 year holiday for zip in return..........even though we got him for stuff all (and it was worth it IMO)......

This year - should Brooks go - would wanna be the year Mqualter/Gwilt grab any chance by the horns.....

It's all a big punt (no mispelling either). Gardiner cost us almost nothing & I'm sure King will be on a performance contract. I quiet like the odds of success on these trades. :D :D :D i think king will be a winner...can't do any worse than clarke or rix ffs....... Coming around are you Mate i...

Gee stinger did you really need to quote an entire post just to say you won't bother reading it? :shock: Isn't it interesting that when the board and the club are stable, the petty bickering and flame wars start up again on the forum? I love this club :) lacks dexterity in the fingers nowadays for ...

A little birdy told me on wednesday evening i aint PMing batshit for ratshit Sheldon wasnt involved in that trade it started with GFC to Peake who you said had nothing to do with it then it went on to involve Lyon, Elshaugh, and Archiebald maybe KS was kept in the loop but it wasnt his baby nuff sa...

A little birdy told me on wednesday evening i aint PMing batshit for ratshit Sheldon wasnt involved in that trade it started with GFC to Peake who you said had nothing to do with it then it went on to involve Lyon, Elshaugh, and Archiebald maybe KS was kept in the loop but it wasnt his baby nuff sa...

Nothing to do with the politics, just that I am led to believe Lyon had other ideas about who he wanted to do Ken's job and was disappointed when he found out Ken was staying. Lyon has since made the relationship work well. they have approached someone else...... You have some inside knowledge. Wel...

So why did they do the trade for a pick they will not use if they we not going to be delisted? ...because they can use pick 90 for their father/son selection.......ffs.... :roll: :roll: :roll: Only if they use their pick before that which I doubt. How can you see with those eyes rolling. ffs ffs ff...

we only got Hamill and co cause we conned the world that Malcolm Blight was taking us to the holy grail....not holy hell.

Fair to say Lyon and Co have done a superb job.

at least hes got an excuse...

luckysaint wrote:

plugger66 wrote:

luckysaint wrote:Would rather that they keep dempster and we simply trade 26 for schnieder

Keep on topic

I reckon We should trade pick 26 for dean cox

no need to get antsy...