Classic case of why club officials SHOULD NOT be witnesses.......

BIAS

sainter58 wrote:
. I would say Farmer said something to him and Bakes Retaliated. .

Wow...you could tell that from the Medallion Club ????:shock:

Can you read lips...or read minds????? Or is your factual report like the freo's trainers....just based on what you "think" happened....

So my understanding is a tribunal hearing based on, not anyone seeing the incdent that someone saw baker running in a different direction that what Baker said he was...... THAT IS bulls***, even if they believe him how can someone be suspended for that. That plus it is somehow a "criminal"...

The freo trainer...whata tosser.

Basically saw nothing except Bakes running 45 degrees towards Farmer before...
Well helo sunshine.... Baker was PLAYING on him. FOOL!!!!!!!!!!


What a joke.

Based on the evidence put up....should NEVER have come to the tribunal. Is a disgrace.

maxfactor wrote:Is he not going out with GT's daughter???

maybe GT gave him a clip then....

I have a feeling he'll play... He missed two games in a row (rounds 12 & 13) and bounced back in round 14 against Brisbane with 35 possessions .... I hope he doesn't, but a chance at top 2 with a home final, me thinks he'll play He may play...but if so if will not be anywhere near fully fit.......

look at how well we've done with Grammy ? Gram wanted to leave..was not rejected. Attard was rejected......but was taken as a rookie....which is a fair enough way to trial a recycled player.....as would be the PSD or a very late pick. You need to balance what the upside is vs cost of aquisition. Wi...

24000 - 23988 = 12, no? :D :wink: Anyhow, I think even 12 eyewitnesses (all with conflicting accounts) is over the mark. It is really quite incredible to me that there is NO actual compelling eyewitness evidence here. Isn't it just bleeding obvious for Pete's sake...... It's because there was nothi...

Dan Warna wrote:
ackland was a required player at Port I thought at the time.

No

My definition of recycled is a player not wanted by their previous club. Stenglein left of his own accord. So did Chick. The original club didn't want to let them go. Akermanis - not wanted by Brisbane McDougall - up for trade by West Coast Ackland - not wanted by Port McGough - delisted by Colling...

Anything is possible ...but we need a lot to go right: Now part from all the team things such as tackling, pressure, playing for 4 quarters etc we need: * That X continues on with the form that he had against Freo. * ditto for Hayes. a dominant Hayes is a hugely importnat player for us. *that Dal ca...

Dockerland mods are acting like tossers..... I have had several looks at their string on it..... And on at least TWO occassions they have actively pruned out posts that suggest that Baker did not doing anything that was cpable of being suspended. ie that it was an accidental clash of heads...... Yet...

Legal Action...

I thought it was another Porn site for a minute

ausfatcat wrote:So he is obviously still interested in footy...

..

well I think the Dees hope he is


I think the idea is that you have someone from outside the club involved....

Yes...is is on the panel...

Grant Thomas. http://www.j-k.gr/emos/4/shrug.gif Yep... Evidently they have an eyewitness who swears that GT snuck onto the ground to belt the guy that was pestering his daughters boyfriend........ :wink: Did not quite catch the promo...just came in half way through. ..............4eva and then the...

thanks Peanut

Well argued......


But why do I feel very nervous still?????

Well the biggest difference is that the AFL does not try and stitch up the cats....

the sooner the season is over for maxxy the better one feels WTF??? :roll: :roll: The week earlier Max had thrashed Hall.... We need an in form Max at FB. its the third or fourth time he has gone down during a game.... with no preseason regardless of who he has towelled up his body is clearly faill...

Saints Premiers 2006 wrote:the sooner the season is over for maxxy the better one feels

WTF???

The week earlier Max had thrashed Hall....

We need an in form Max at FB.

So because a Freo Official says bakes did something...the AFL bends to their whim...

What a joke

Mike On The Couch states that it is due to Freo Official saying that Bakes did something?????


I mean Fair Dinkum...how could that be reliable or conclusive..

As he was an official....he could not have been near......

What crap.....

If an official he is obviouslya LONG long away....

How could that be reliable or conclusive????

bangerisking wrote:

saintsRrising wrote:Don't forget that GT's daughter is going out with Baker

Bakes is going out with Thommo's daughter is this true and is it Kasey?

Yes...and I don't know which daughter.



However as Bakes gf...she may have been the only one actually watch Bakes!!! at the time....