This thread is a disgrace!

Typical Trolling.

I was definitely against trading for Hanners and I actually demanded that Gallagher be sacked. Obviously they did not sack him. Anyway, Hanners is a Saints player now and we have to make the best of it. He hasn't played VFL yet so I'm guessing he will be lucky to debut by round. 15. That being the ...

I was definitely against trading for Hanners and I actually demanded that Gallagher be sacked. Obviously they did not sack him. Anyway, Hanners is a Saints player now and we have to make the best of it. He hasn't played VFL yet so I'm guessing he will be lucky to debut by round. 15. That being the ...

Not at all sweetie.

Linton Lodger wrote: ↑Fri 24 May 2019 11:19pm

King12 wrote: ↑Fri 24 May 2019 9:44pm Geez, some on here need to read more, I mentioned all this a while back!

I saw your post. Please tell me he’s not coming to the Saints.

Well, as I stated, he's not leaving North to become unemployed!

Had nothing to do with pay packets. Nobody wanted Longer, and rightly so. We had too many ruck men and Hickey had a value! Incorrect, it's called Salary Cap, Hickey was not of any value on $600k a year, still isn't! Yet we’re happy to pay DH $800k for the next 5 years :shock: Yeap, more happy with ...

Had nothing to do with pay packets. Nobody wanted Longer, and rightly so. We had too many ruck men and Hickey had a value! Incorrect, it's called Salary Cap, Hickey was not of any value on $600k a year, still isn't! Yet we’re happy to pay DH $800k for the next 5 years :shock: Yeap, more happy with ...

well, SEN on their website, have the headline about "Brad Scott News" Disgraceful. It's not "news". It is "rumour" or "gossip". "News" has to be fact-checked with validity and accuracy confirmed. A meteor was seen over Victoria and NT recently, caus...

Had nothing to do with pay packets. Nobody wanted Longer, and rightly so. We had too many ruck men and Hickey had a value! Incorrect, it's called Salary Cap, Hickey was not of any value on $600k a year, still isn't! Yet we’re happy to pay DH $800k for the next 5 years :shock: Yeap, more happy with ...

Joffa Burns wrote: ↑Fri 24 May 2019 10:21pm

King12 wrote: ↑Fri 24 May 2019 5:12pm Well someone has taken too many toxic substances, that's for certain!

Agree, that’s for certain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Settle down Sweetie Pie, a gentleman of your age couldn't handle me!

freely wrote: ↑Fri 24 May 2019 10:10pm

King12 wrote: ↑Fri 24 May 2019 10:05pm

King12 wrote: ↑Wed 15 May 2019 7:54pm Brad Scott if you believe Tom Browne.

BUMP- for all those that didn't read it earlier!

Yes, it's important we remember which posters to thank for relaying which rumours.

Well, I didn't see anyone relaying it.

Scott hasn't quit North to become unemployed!

King12 wrote: ↑Wed 15 May 2019 7:54pm Brad Scott if you believe Tom Browne.

BUMP- for all those that didn't read it earlier!

Geez, some on here need to read more, I mentioned all this a while back!

skeptic wrote: ↑Fri 24 May 2019 8:41pm

King12 wrote: ↑Fri 24 May 2019 2:44pm Hickey was never our best asset, NEVER.

Don't understand what you mean by this.

He was never our best player sure but prior to this season he was by far our best ruck over three seasons

That's what happens when you don't read the full posts.

Haha, yes very true darling.

No worries, put them in Bubble Wrap then, anyway, most of the bad behavior at the football is caused by males, Fact!

Enjoy the game with your family dear. x

Hickey was never our best asset, NEVER. There's a little thing called Salary Cap that would counter any argument you might have. Any wonder you left the workforce and never returned. You don't need to get personal when expressing an opinion One thing I can't stand more than an apologist or a nuffie...

Well someone has taken too many toxic substances, that's for certain!

Had nothing to do with pay packets. Nobody wanted Longer, and rightly so. We had too many ruck men and Hickey had a value! Incorrect, it's called Salary Cap, Hickey was not of any value on $600k a year, still isn't! Yet we’re happy to pay DH $800k for the next 5 years :shock: Yeap, more happy with ...

Had nothing to do with pay packets. Nobody wanted Longer, and rightly so. We had too many ruck men and Hickey had a value! Incorrect, it's called Salary Cap, Hickey was not of any value on $600k a year, still isn't! West Coast still trying to figure a way to polish a 'Turd', good luck to them, they...

Had nothing to do with pay packets. Nobody wanted Longer, and rightly so. We had too many ruck men and Hickey had a value! Incorrect, it's called Salary Cap, Hickey was not of any value on $600k a year, still isn't! Yet we’re happy to pay DH $800k for the next 5 years :shock: Yeap, more happy with ...

Had nothing to do with pay packets. Nobody wanted Longer, and rightly so. We had too many ruck men and Hickey had a value! Incorrect, it's called Salary Cap, Hickey was not of any value on $600k a year, still isn't! West Coast still trying to figure a way to polish a 'Turd', good luck to them, they...

Hickey was never our best asset, NEVER.

There's a little thing called Salary Cap that would counter any argument you might have.

Any wonder you left the workforce and never returned.

Seems like people saying crap like he doesn't like Richo or is sick of the club are pretty far off the mark. Maybe it's time they shut up for a change. Unhelpful and quite frankly moronic responses. Here, here, time to stop stipulating and be more supportive of ALL! I've had my say on Jack in the p...

The question not asked is, given our disclosed "Unavailable" List, who is left who is available for selection outside those named in the extended List for Sunday? And what is their status and what would they add? In my view we are scraping the bottom of the barrel in terms of availability...