SaintPav wrote:Tony’s version of events: “slight hammy twinge”.
Jaxon’s version of events: “significant hamstring injury that sees him out of action for 4 weeks”.
So who’s right?
Tony of course.
![Wink :wink:](./images/smilies/icon_wink.gif)
He is spot on most of the time.
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
SaintPav wrote:Tony’s version of events: “slight hammy twinge”.
Jaxon’s version of events: “significant hamstring injury that sees him out of action for 4 weeks”.
So who’s right?
Let’s not forget Tony said: “So as for Freezer. Certainly hasn’t broken down...”saynta wrote:SaintPav wrote:Tony’s version of events: “slight hammy twinge”.
Jaxon’s version of events: “significant hamstring injury that sees him out of action for 4 weeks”.
So who’s right?
Tony of course.That's where i;m putting my money.
He is spot on most of the time.
SaintPav wrote:Let’s not forget Tony said: “So as for Freezer. Certainly hasn’t broken down...”saynta wrote:SaintPav wrote:Tony’s version of events: “slight hammy twinge”.
Jaxon’s version of events: “significant hamstring injury that sees him out of action for 4 weeks”.
So who’s right?
Tony of course.That's where i;m putting my money.
He is spot on most of the time.
But, NO Saynta, not according to some because it’s not open to interpretation because they know exactly what happened.
But guess this, any hamstring injury to Freeman is bad news given his history. A brilliant insight.
Me too. Good bloke Tony. You just get the facts. There are no dramatics laced with riddles and the stuff of fiction novels.saynta wrote:SaintPav wrote:Tony’s version of events: “slight hammy twinge”.
Jaxon’s version of events: “significant hamstring injury that sees him out of action for 4 weeks”.
So who’s right?
Tony of course.That's where I'm putting my money.
He is spot on most of the time.
Hate? Jealously? Are you serious. This is a faceless message board site for Saints fans.Spinner wrote:parkeysainter wrote:Don't even dare question the Saintsational.net messiah Saynta.saynta wrote:Spinner wrote:saynta wrote:jaxons wrote:All I can tell you is he injured his hamstring again a few weeks ago. Sorry for the dramatic broken down comment, but how else would you describe another significant hamstring injury that sees him out of action for 4 weeks?
Significant? Since when does minor translate into significant ?
I seriously question what is wrong with you. Jaxon brings great info to this Forum and you and a few others constantly love to have a crack over the smallest of things.
Is it jealously? Is it a complex? I'm really interested and continually surprised there are ppl in this world like this...Get a life, or at least a clue. It wasn't me trying to turn a slight twinge into a career threatening, if not a life ending, injury.
Why the hate though? It's clearly there, and thanks for popping in cos you've been vocal in past too, right on cue.
I just don't get it. Still no answers - must be jealously.
Love the info on this forum. Hope others don't drive it away.
parkeysainter wrote:Me too. Good bloke Tony. You just get the facts. There are no dramatics laced with riddles and the stuff of fiction novels.saynta wrote:SaintPav wrote:Tony’s version of events: “slight hammy twinge”.
Jaxon’s version of events: “significant hamstring injury that sees him out of action for 4 weeks”.
So who’s right?
Tony of course.That's where I'm putting my money.
He is spot on most of the time.
Plus one.parkeysainter wrote:Hate? Jealously? Are you serious. This is a faceless message board site for Saints fans.Spinner wrote:parkeysainter wrote:Don't even dare question the Saintsational.net messiah Saynta.saynta wrote:Spinner wrote:saynta wrote:jaxons wrote:All I can tell you is he injured his hamstring again a few weeks ago. Sorry for the dramatic broken down comment, but how else would you describe another significant hamstring injury that sees him out of action for 4 weeks?
Significant? Since when does minor translate into significant ?
I seriously question what is wrong with you. Jaxon brings great info to this Forum and you and a few others constantly love to have a crack over the smallest of things.
Is it jealously? Is it a complex? I'm really interested and continually surprised there are ppl in this world like this...Get a life, or at least a clue. It wasn't me trying to turn a slight twinge into a career threatening, if not a life ending, injury.
Why the hate though? It's clearly there, and thanks for popping in cos you've been vocal in past too, right on cue.
I just don't get it. Still no answers - must be jealously.
Love the info on this forum. Hope others don't drive it away.
I love any info anyone provides. I'm just not gullible beyond belief and I can ask questions of anyone, just like anyone else can on here also. I will never be a suckhole.
Drake Huggins wrote:Tony74 is the genuine insider on this site. Watches training, reports faithfully and isn't full of his own importance.
If we had a game tomorrow only three wouldn’t be considered- 10, 18 and 36. Meatball and Juice would be iffy.miskycat wrote:So, is he right to play or not? Couldn't work it out from the thread.
A simple answer, please.
Who is Juice?tony74 wrote:If we had a game tomorrow only three wouldn’t be considered- 10, 18 and 36. Meatball and Juice would be iffy.miskycat wrote:So, is he right to play or not? Couldn't work it out from the thread.
A simple answer, please.
Josh Bruce, I believe - at least that's my preferred shout rather than "Bruuuuuuuuuce"parkeysainter wrote:Who is Juice?tony74 wrote:If we had a game tomorrow only three wouldn’t be considered- 10, 18 and 36. Meatball and Juice would be iffy.miskycat wrote:So, is he right to play or not? Couldn't work it out from the thread.
A simple answer, please.
what about 12, mate? ffs!! i hear zero chance of playing at all this season.tony74 wrote:If we had a game tomorrow only three wouldn’t be considered- 10, 18 and 36. Meatball and Juice would be iffy.miskycat wrote:So, is he right to play or not? Couldn't work it out from the thread.
A simple answer, please.
that'd be simpson, mate. but ffs!!! at his age and given his flowering criminal record, i'd rate that seeunexttuesday drummer boy as more than just 'iffy', ffs!!!parkeysainter wrote:Who is Juice?
jaxons is a flowering muso too??? thanks for the word con.Con Gorozidis wrote:Everyone is right here. Jaxons band 'Tone' have reported the same thing.
So Freeman is set to join match practice by week after next?tony74 wrote:P.S. If the game was next week they’d all probably be considered.
Jaxons and 'Tone' play some new Orleans Jazz on Sunday afternoon.Gordo' wrote:jaxons is a flowering muso too??? thanks for the word con.Con Gorozidis wrote:Everyone is right here. Jaxons band 'Tone' have reported the same thing.though mate, ffs, i've been a bit slow on the uptake on ths one. it should have been already flowering obvious to me!
![]()
so jaxons. mate, when is your band's next gig? i'd love to drop in for a bit of jam mate. i know that our axman plucker66 is keen, as is stringer our organist. and i might even see if I can coax young harriet along to help out with the vocals? (so talented, but just a bit flowering shy sometimes.)
Jaxons and 'Tone' play some new Orleans Jazz on Sunday afternoon.Gordo' wrote:jaxons is a flowering muso too??? thanks for the word con.Con Gorozidis wrote:Everyone is right here. Jaxons band 'Tone' have reported the same thing.though mate, ffs, i've been a bit slow on the uptake on ths one. it should have been already flowering obvious to me!
![]()
so jaxons. mate, when is your band's next gig? i'd love to drop in for a bit of jam mate. i know that our axman plucker66 is keen, as is stringer our organist. and i might even see if I can coax young harriet along to help out with the vocals? (so talented, but just a bit flowering shy sometimes.)
supersaints wrote:Both Tony and Jaxons are valuable contributors to this site... and probably give more insight than all of us others combined. So any chance in just letting nv them have a say then make your own conclusions without the bulls*** ... It doesn't really matter who is right, because it's just info ... that I ( and many others) appreciate.
All this "mines bigger than yours" and "he's right because" is paramount to dysfunctional personality problems .
I could be wrong ....but I have never seen Tony or Jaxons bag each other or say I'm right .. your wrong... but some posters continually bring up an argument about who's right ...who's wrong, so if niether of the poster seem concerned.. why so much angst....
waste of time and more importantly ruins threads (IMO.)
supersaints wrote:Both Tony and Jaxons are valuable contributors to this site... and probably give more insight than all of us others combined. So any chance in just letting nv them have a say then make your own conclusions without the bulls*** ... It doesn't really matter who is right, because it's just info ... that I ( and many others) appreciate.
All this "mines bigger than yours" and "he's right because" is paramount to dysfunctional personality problems .
I could be wrong ....but I have never seen Tony or Jaxons bag each other or say I'm right .. your wrong... but some posters continually bring up an argument about who's right ...who's wrong, so if niether of the poster seem concerned.. why so much angst....
waste of time and more importantly ruins threads (IMO.)