I am astounded by the stupidity of the conspiracy theorists on this site.
Until you have information pertaining to...
1. When Bain's informed the club he was in discussions with Bulldogs, Hawks etc
2. When he accepted the role
3. When he informed the club
4. The agreed timing of his departure between club and individual
5. The agreed responsibilities he was to undertake before leaving
6. The ongoing restrictions put upon him by the club and his contract
... you are as usual, blindly speculating on opinion and theory with no fact.
So if we listen to conspiracy we have Bain's potentially choosing not to trade for Schache and Stringer to feather the nest of the Dogs while keeping his contact with Dogs a secret (yep, secrets in footy
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
)
It also appears Bain's and Bain's alone had total lost management responsibility
FFS some left wing apologists on here have no idea about business in the real world
I guess it's too logical to think that Bain's was professional and informed the Saints all the way through the process of discussion with the Dogs and negotiated a mutually beneficial departure after the trade period.