TBH I think we covet them a little... or at least their success.PeckettofChips wrote:I think Collingwood covetted us!
![Crying or Very sad :cry:](./images/smilies/icon_cry.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
TBH I think we covet them a little... or at least their success.PeckettofChips wrote:I think Collingwood covetted us!
Pretty much...joffaboy wrote:Ahhh the Vatican...head office and epicentre of the vast wealth of Corporate Catholicism....Thinline wrote:She's having a wow of a time atop a fluffy white cloud listening to all those angels playing harp while she watches god keep an eye on the financial journals as he figures out a way to maximise earnings from all that Vatican gold...
meanwhile millions of believers live on subsistance earnings......
And prime land the world over that they've never paid a cent for, nor land taxes on. And tithes from some of the poorest people in the world, again tax free. And donations from credulous believers every time there's a new statue 'crying' olive oil.ThePunter wrote:A lot of the Vatican's wealth is in assets such as Relics and Reglious artefacts that wouldn't be sold under any circumstances, and are entirely appropriately held by the Vatican.
Have you been?ThePunter wrote:A lot of the Vatican's wealth is in assets such as Relics and Reglious artefacts that wouldn't be sold under any circumstances, and are entirely appropriately held by the Vatican.
joffaboy wrote:Good, because you are the most offensive hypocrite oin this forum.stinger wrote:.... pple might be having fun putting sh!t on my faith in this thread , but i find it offensive
The New Testament is quite clear on the subjects of possession of material wealth and aiding the poor and impoverished.ThePunter wrote:I was there at Easter.
I would rather all those things be in the hands of the church than any collector.
Most of the artefacts wouldn't have been "purchased", so there was no wastage of church money.
They are valuable on paper.
They are in their rightful place.
LOL!ChicagoSaint wrote:we could bag Islam but where's the fun in THAT?
As Saints supporters I get the die part, but when do we get the chance to LIVE???!!!!????Thinline wrote:It's all bananas.
I mean why do you need to be told to be a good person? Why does there need to be rules for that?
Maybe I should start my own religion (very tax effective operation as it happens).
It could be the 'Good bloke and you beaut sheila Foundation for people who do good stuff around the place.'
Really, if you just accept that you live and then you die, life's far less difficult to 'get'.
Sorry I've kept out of this discussion until now.ThePunter wrote:A lot of the Vatican's wealth is in assets such as Relics and Reglious artefacts that wouldn't be sold under any circumstances, and are entirely appropriately held by the Vatican.
Unfortunately WM I don't think that is strictly true.White Winmar wrote:What Enrico Misso said. Times 1,000. Eventually science will push this stupid, exploitative, evil superstition into its grave. The only place it grows is the 3rd world, where the poor, the ignorant and desperate can be exploited more easily.
I think a big part of the problem most people have with the Church is when they appear to not be following their own rules... or the 'spirit' of their own religion.Saintstragic wrote:While I agree that everyone has a right to their opinion, I cannot judge people as a whole by what they believe in, and while the Catholic church and people within it have made mistakes, the basic faith that they follow is similar to most Western churches.
Are the laws of the Catholic church any stranger than some of the other religions, or is it that as a large religious organisation it is more open to attack??
Every church has it's rules, there are other churches that like their followers to have large families, say what they are able to eat or drink (Mormons) Ban dancing on any church premises (Baptists) do not allow their followers to watch television or listen to popular music.......
All of this though takes away from the good things that this particular woman did to educate children and help the poor !
If you don't understand Sainthood, it's like a Hall of Fame, where peoples good deeds and work for an organisation are acknowledged.....it just gets reported far more widely!!!
Go for it. After all, it was good enough for L. Ron Hubbard.Thinline wrote:It's all bananas.
I mean why do you need to be told to be a good person? Why does there need to be rules for that?
Maybe I should start my own religion (very tax effective operation as it happens).
It could be the 'Good bloke and you beaut sheila Foundation for people who do good stuff around the place.'
Really, if you just accept that you live and then you die, life's far less difficult to 'get'.
Ah, now somebody's got their thinking hat on!White Winmar wrote:BTW, MacKillop to centre half forward. Roo to full forward. Like Baldock before her, she's a short centre half forward who can apparently perform miracles. Just like the Doc himself. Should we make her captain as well?
Or we could just recruit "the flying nun".InkerSaint wrote:Ah, now somebody's got their thinking hat on!White Winmar wrote:BTW, MacKillop to centre half forward. Roo to full forward. Like Baldock before her, she's a short centre half forward who can apparently perform miracles. Just like the Doc himself. Should we make her captain as well?