Polo v Bakes
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Polo v Bakes
I know Lyon said Polo would be used as support/back up for lenny. But given the impact small fwds have at the moment is there any chance polo can play on a defensive fwd (gartlet, dids, le cras, stokes) types?
I know dempster has been used to some effect on small fwds recently and I dont know a lot about Polo so excuse my ignorance on the matter. But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
I know dempster has been used to some effect on small fwds recently and I dont know a lot about Polo so excuse my ignorance on the matter. But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
Re: Polo v Bakes
yep, i reckon you just might be right on this one.Con Gorozidis wrote:But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
- DWOODROW
- Club Player
- Posts: 1123
- Joined: Tue 10 Feb 2009 4:36pm
- Location: TOWNSVILLE
- Has thanked: 8 times
- Been thanked: 38 times
Re: Polo v Bakes
Guess Armo should start looking for somewhere else to go now then. He hasn't been told he will be used for anything. I thought he was supposed to be back up for Lenny.Con Gorozidis wrote:I know Lyon said Polo would be used as support/back up for lenny. But given the impact small fwds have at the moment is there any chance polo can play on a defensive fwd (gartlet, dids, le cras, stokes) types?
I know dempster has been used to some effect on small fwds recently and I dont know a lot about Polo so excuse my ignorance on the matter. But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
Re: Polo v Bakes
share your frustration mate.......and i'm not related to any sainter......DWOODROW wrote:Guess Armo should start looking for somewhere else to go now then. He hasn't been told he will be used for anything. I thought he was supposed to be back up for Lenny.Con Gorozidis wrote:I know Lyon said Polo would be used as support/back up for lenny. But given the impact small fwds have at the moment is there any chance polo can play on a defensive fwd (gartlet, dids, le cras, stokes) types?
I know dempster has been used to some effect on small fwds recently and I dont know a lot about Polo so excuse my ignorance on the matter. But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
.everybody still loves lenny....and we always will
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
"Freedom of expression is the cornerstone of a free society,"
However, freedom of expression is not encouraged in certain forums.
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 965
- Joined: Tue 03 Feb 2009 4:25pm
- Has thanked: 24 times
- Been thanked: 9 times
Re: Polo v Bakes
I think he has potentional to make the team in his own right. Not a back up to anyone.DWOODROW wrote:Guess Armo should start looking for somewhere else to go now then. He hasn't been told he will be used for anything. I thought he was supposed to be back up for Lenny.Con Gorozidis wrote:I know Lyon said Polo would be used as support/back up for lenny. But given the impact small fwds have at the moment is there any chance polo can play on a defensive fwd (gartlet, dids, le cras, stokes) types?
I know dempster has been used to some effect on small fwds recently and I dont know a lot about Polo so excuse my ignorance on the matter. But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
Hopefully he can stay injury/niggle free and he can show us how good he can be consistently.
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Polo v Bakes
in my best 22 - i have armo first rover. just thinking polo might work as a small defender cos there are so many small fwds these days and they have a habit of cutting us up and as great a warrior as he has been bakes might be almost baked.DWOODROW wrote:Guess Armo should start looking for somewhere else to go now then. He hasn't been told he will be used for anything. I thought he was supposed to be back up for Lenny.Con Gorozidis wrote:I know Lyon said Polo would be used as support/back up for lenny. But given the impact small fwds have at the moment is there any chance polo can play on a defensive fwd (gartlet, dids, le cras, stokes) types?
I know dempster has been used to some effect on small fwds recently and I dont know a lot about Polo so excuse my ignorance on the matter. But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
Re: Polo v Bakes
Do you think the recruitement of Polo will help Dave feel motivated DW, same as all the other players and roles that we seem to have good depth for now?DWOODROW wrote: Guess Armo should start looking for somewhere else to go now then. He hasn't been told he will be used for anything. I thought he was supposed to be back up for Lenny.
I remember reading an article at the start of this year, where David was interviewed and said he wasn't under any pressure, that the spot was there for the taking.
Now his competitive juices may start flowing, knowing that there is someone breathing down his neck?
Nothing like a bit of pressure for spots to keep a team motivated.
- Animal Enclosure
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Mon 04 Apr 2005 2:37pm
- Location: Saints Footy Central
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
Re: Polo v Bakes
That makes two forward structures we need to be able to account for. Collingwood's tall timber (Dawes/Cloke/Brown) or Carlton's mosquito fleet (Betts/Yarran/Garlett).bergholt wrote:yep, i reckon you just might be right on this one.Con Gorozidis wrote:But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
Which one is most likely to be around at the pointy end of September?
"... You want to pose a threat to the opposition in as many ways as you can, both defensively and offensively. We've got a responsibility to explore all those possibilities - and we will."
Re: Polo v Bakes
what? i don't have to tell you that collingwood still have smalls (beams/sidebottom/macaffer/blair/etc) in the same way carlton still have talls. we'll always need one or two small defenders. bakes is aging fast and with the delisting of miles there's no obvious replacement. dempster could be close, as could polo. surely that's the original point?InkerSaint wrote:That makes two forward structures we need to be able to account for. Collingwood's tall timber (Dawes/Cloke/Brown) or Carlton's mosquito fleet (Betts/Yarran/Garlett).bergholt wrote:yep, i reckon you just might be right on this one.Con Gorozidis wrote:But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
Which one is most likely to be around at the pointy end of September?
- Con Gorozidis
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23532
- Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
- Has thanked: 100 times
- Been thanked: 78 times
Re: Polo v Bakes
bergholt wrote:what? i don't have to tell you that collingwood still have smalls (beams/sidebottom/macaffer/blair/etc) in the same way carlton still have talls. we'll always need one or two small defenders. bakes is aging fast and with the delisting of miles there's no obvious replacement. dempster could be close, as could polo. surely that's the original point?InkerSaint wrote:That makes two forward structures we need to be able to account for. Collingwood's tall timber (Dawes/Cloke/Brown) or Carlton's mosquito fleet (Betts/Yarran/Garlett).bergholt wrote:yep, i reckon you just might be right on this one.Con Gorozidis wrote:But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
Which one is most likely to be around at the pointy end of September?
agree - have u heard of didak?
anyway we need both littles and bigs anda flexible defence or are u just conceding to carlton and essendon every year cos we only care about september? with that kind of attitude we wont see september.
- InkerSaint
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 2132
- Joined: Wed 07 Jan 2009 3:06pm
-
- Club Player
- Posts: 1497
- Joined: Wed 24 Mar 2004 11:45am
Re: Polo v Bakes
Geez, Armo needs to work hard, play some good games consecutively in the lower grade and force (demand) his way into the side. Being ear marked for a role, or thinking it is there for the taking is BS. These guys are lucky to be on an AFL list and need to work hard and repay the faith the clubs have shown in them by choosing them in the first place. I for one like Armo, and the games he has played for us have been ok, none have set the world on fire. But really getting sick of this discussion every time we talk about an in and under role, or some role he might be able to play. Work hard and make it impossible not to select you in the side! If he is thinking like you DWOODROW he will never bloody make it!SainterK wrote:Do you think the recruitement of Polo will help Dave feel motivated DW, same as all the other players and roles that we seem to have good depth for now?DWOODROW wrote: Guess Armo should start looking for somewhere else to go now then. He hasn't been told he will be used for anything. I thought he was supposed to be back up for Lenny.
I remember reading an article at the start of this year, where David was interviewed and said he wasn't under any pressure, that the spot was there for the taking.
Now his competitive juices may start flowing, knowing that there is someone breathing down his neck?
Nothing like a bit of pressure for spots to keep a team motivated.
1600 nominated for the AFL draft and about 100 make it. Lucky to be there and need to work as hard as humanly possible to make it to the senior side once on a list.
- Eastern
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 14357
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 1:46pm
- Location: 3132
- Been thanked: 1 time
Re: Polo v Bakes
Or, he could go about demanding a spot by training the house down over summer and producing the form that many believe he is capable of during the pre-season/nab cup !!DWOODROW wrote:Guess Armo should start looking for somewhere else to go now then. He hasn't been told he will be used for anything. I thought he was supposed to be back up for Lenny.Con Gorozidis wrote:I know Lyon said Polo would be used as support/back up for lenny. But given the impact small fwds have at the moment is there any chance polo can play on a defensive fwd (gartlet, dids, le cras, stokes) types?
I know dempster has been used to some effect on small fwds recently and I dont know a lot about Polo so excuse my ignorance on the matter. But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
NEW scarf signature (hopefully with correct spelling) will be here as soon as it arrives !!
-
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3152
- Joined: Tue 02 Jun 2009 2:44am
- Location: Next to what's next to me.
- Has thanked: 71 times
- Been thanked: 35 times
Re: Polo v Bakes
Not to mention Krakouer. But I'm not sure Polo is the answer to the "smalls". He's not really "small", or particularly quick, himself, I wouldn't have thought. Maybe the only chance Mini has of playing a long career is to play that role once Bakes moves on. And maybe that's the role we got Cripps to play.Con Gorozidis wrote:bergholt wrote:what? i don't have to tell you that collingwood still have smalls (beams/sidebottom/macaffer/blair/etc) in the same way carlton still have talls. we'll always need one or two small defenders. bakes is aging fast and with the delisting of miles there's no obvious replacement. dempster could be close, as could polo. surely that's the original point?InkerSaint wrote:That makes two forward structures we need to be able to account for. Collingwood's tall timber (Dawes/Cloke/Brown) or Carlton's mosquito fleet (Betts/Yarran/Garlett).bergholt wrote:yep, i reckon you just might be right on this one.Con Gorozidis wrote:But sooner or later and maybe sooner we will need a replacement for Bakes to cover all these goal scoring fleas.
Which one is most likely to be around at the pointy end of September?
agree - have u heard of didak?
anyway we need both littles and bigs anda flexible defence or are u just conceding to carlton and essendon every year cos we only care about september? with that kind of attitude we wont see september.
YOU GET WHAT YOU SETTLE FOR.