Scarlett accosting Roo

Sainternist · Sat 26 Mar 2011 1:18am

A caller on SEN seemed to think that Scarlett did some cowardly things, to the extent of being reportable incidents and was the reason for Roo coming off the ground in the second quarter(?).

Anyone care to attest to this observation?

savatage · Post: # 1051764Post **savatage** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 1:26am

Sainternist wrote:A caller on SEN seemed to think that Scarlett did some cowardly things, to the extent of being reportable incidents and was the reason for Roo coming off the ground in the second quarter(?).

Anyone care to attest to this observation?

HE elbowed him in the guts from memory. Will go for it.

PJ · Post: # 1051768Post PJ » Sat 26 Mar 2011 1:28am

picked up on video - away from the play. Would seem to be obvious.

Sainternist · Sat 26 Mar 2011 1:48am

The Scarlett Pimple strikes again!

That farking dog

degruch · Post: # 1051803Post **degruch** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 2:15am

savatage wrote:HE elbowed him in the guts from memory. Will go for it.

True...but I bet you any money he doesn't even get cited.

AlpineStars · Sat 26 Mar 2011 4:16pm

He smacked Roo about 5 years ago the same about 100m behind the play and the AFL said inconclusive video footage, he is a dog.

suss · Post: # 1052117Post **suss** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 4:21pm

AlpineStars wrote:He smacked Roo about 5 years ago the same about 100m behind the play and the AFL said inconclusive video footage, he is a dog.

It never stopped them from hanging Baker...

wasaintsfan · Sat 26 Mar 2011 4:53pm

i want to know wiether or not stokes will go for the tunnel on clarke... seriously couldve broke his neck just because he felt like it :S

was no attempt to put pressure on clarke.. didnt even attempt to get the ball

st_Trav_ofWA · Sat 26 Mar 2011 5:40pm

imo Scarlet could be in trouble ... Stokes gave away the free thats where it will stop ...

Eastern · Post: # 1052177Post **Eastern** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 5:45pm

The footy shows tomorrow morning will give a fair indication as to whether it was reportable or not (I didn't see it). Besides, I'm far more interested in the Farren Ray-Selwood clash as it has a bearing on OUR club !!

st_Trav_ofWA · Sat 26 Mar 2011 5:49pm

Eastern wrote:The footy shows tomorrow morning will give a fair indication as to whether it was reportable or not (I didn't see it). Besides, I'm far more interested in the Farren Ray-Selwood clash as it has a bearing on OUR club !!

at worst a reprimand ... Ray did everything he could to avoid the contact both were going for the ball ... selwood is just lucky it was a rare occasion where he didnt duck his head otherwise the hit could of been much much worse

mad saint guy · Sat 26 Mar 2011 5:49pm

Scarlett blatantly and forcefully elbowed an unsuspecting Riewoldt in the ribs 100m off the ball. Should be 2 weeks. Stokes has nothing to answer though, was a careless free kick but no malice in it.

Sainternist · Sat 26 Mar 2011 5:57pm

Eastern wrote:I'm far more interested in the Farren Ray-Selwood clash as it has a bearing on OUR club !!

Faz should be okay. Selwood even said (via twitter) that he felt there was no malice on Ray's behalf.

older saint · Sat 26 Mar 2011 6:50pm

comes down to points. Ray will get a week, negligent, high in play guilty plea and good record will either be a week or just under.

Scarlett is an ordinary bloke ( see his commetns to harves in 2008 after 1st final) . Guaranteed they will say not enough to be a strike.. remember Judd broke Pavs cheek and won a brownlow.

plugger66 · Post: # 1052221Post **plugger66** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 6:55pm

older saint wrote:comes down to points. Ray will get a week, negligent, high in play guilty plea and good record will either be a week or just under.

Scarlett is an ordinary bloke ( see his commetns to harves in 2008 after 1st final) . Guaranteed they will say not enough to be a strike.. remember Judd broke Pavs cheek and won a brownlow.

Neither will go and neither should.

st_Trav_ofWA · Sat 26 Mar 2011 7:06pm

plugger66 wrote:
older saint wrote:comes down to points. Ray will get a week, negligent, high in play guilty plea and good record will either be a week or just under.

Scarlett is an ordinary bloke ( see his commetns to harves in 2008 after 1st final) . Guaranteed they will say not enough to be a strike.. remember Judd broke Pavs cheek and won a brownlow.
Neither will go and neither should.

scarlet should ... it was shown clear vission multiple times on TV ... if the MRP ignore it then honestly even you the AFL and MRP supporter will have to questiong why .... you cant elbow a bloke behind play

seano1 · Post: # 1052256Post **seano1** » Sat 26 Mar 2011 8:07pm

scarlett also did a Kerr job (elbow) in a pack in 2nd qtr to macca at bottom of pack

Sainter_Dad · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:04pm

seano1 wrote:scarlett also did a Kerr job (elbow) in a pack in 2nd qtr to macca at bottom of pack

You are not saying Scarlett is a 'Dan Kerr' are you??

kosifantutti23 · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:48pm

Sainter_Dad wrote:
seano1 wrote:scarlett also did a Kerr job (elbow) in a pack in 2nd qtr to macca at bottom of pack
You are not saying Scarlett is a 'Dan Kerr' are you??

He is like Kerr but much lighter in color. In fact I'd say he had an unnatural or sickly pallor.

That would make him a Wan Kerr.

Enrico_Misso · Sat 26 Mar 2011 9:52pm

So how come they don't seem to be showing this footage on the news bulletins (or did I just miss it)?

If it was Baker, it would be replayed at every newsbreak.

asiu · Post: # 1052427Post **asiu** » Sun 27 Mar 2011 10:54am

scarelatte is a dog.

that was a dog act ... designed to hurt bigtime

we need one of the cray bothers at st kilda if this is what its really about

(which it is)

saint66au · Sun 27 Mar 2011 11:01am

st_Trav_ofWA wrote:
plugger66 wrote:
older saint wrote:comes down to points. Ray will get a week, negligent, high in play guilty plea and good record will either be a week or just under.

Scarlett is an ordinary bloke ( see his commetns to harves in 2008 after 1st final) . Guaranteed they will say not enough to be a strike.. remember Judd broke Pavs cheek and won a brownlow.
Neither will go and neither should.
scarlet should ... it was shown clear vission multiple times on TV ... if the MRP ignore it then honestly even you the AFL and MRP supporter will have to questiong why .... you cant elbow a bloke behind play

....unless youre Barry Hall, then you can punch em in the guts

Funny though, Fraser Gehrig dished out dozens of those and we all screamed "tummy tap nothing in it"

goodie · Post: # 1052437Post **goodie** » Sun 27 Mar 2011 11:47am

He only does it because he rates him so highly

matrix · Post: # 1052439Post **matrix** » Sun 27 Mar 2011 11:51am

frasier actually got a game for one if i remember right.

scarlett has to go
if baker can get two weeks for cracking someone on the hand because its injured then thats worth 12 ffs.
afl said they want to stamp out unsportsman like acts....so lets see them keep enforcing what baker was used as a patsy for.

PJ · Post: # 1052441Post PJ » Sun 27 Mar 2011 11:52am

What may also be of interest to the MRP is the footage of Roo afterwards going off and clearly showing distress. MRP clearly has an agenda regarding the impact on the player in relation to how serious thay take it.

Scarlett accosting Roo

Scarlett accosting Roo

Re: Scarlett accosting Roo

Re: Scarlett accosting Roo