Tall Forwards

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Tall Forwards

Post: # 1096041Post Con Gorozidis »

Im still gutted about Jarryd Allen.

But I still have hope that Stanley, Johnson, Cahill, Archer can all play a bit. Cahill and Stanley need to get a wriggle on but I still have hopes in all 4 of them. If 1 of them steps up in the next 12 months we might be ok.

(note that Jarred Grant from the Dogs kicked 8 in the VFL this weekend)


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1096045Post SainterK »

It depends on the trend of the game Con, big bodied forwards are the in form ones at the moment.

Cloke, Petrie, Kennedy...

Perhaps the game will evolve back to suiting the slight more athletic forward soon, but until then, they will struggle to make an impact IMO.


User avatar
Junction Oval
SS Life Member
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
Been thanked: 19 times

Post: # 1096056Post Junction Oval »

Give them some games so that we can see what they can contribute.
If not, why did we recruit them in the first place. :!:

Geelong's team that beat Adelaide over the weekend, had 8 players with fewer than 20 games experience, so it can be done.


bergholt
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7356
Joined: Wed 11 Aug 2004 9:25am

Post: # 1096107Post bergholt »

who says we need our own stand-alone reserves team, so that the style of play is the same?
For much of the game it was too many missed targets, too many handballs, and far too many behinds punctuated by some terrific acts of courage and desperation to force the ball into goal scoring situations.
sounds like they were playing exactly like the senior team!


St Nick

Re: Tall Forwards

Post: # 1096108Post St Nick »

Con Gorozidis wrote:Im still gutted about Jarryd Allen.

But I still have hope that Stanley, Johnson, Cahill, Archer can all play a bit. Cahill and Stanley need to get a wriggle on but I still have hopes in all 4 of them. If 1 of them steps up in the next 12 months we might be ok.

(note that Jarred Grant from the Dogs kicked 8 in the VFL this weekend)
It will be very difficult for them to make it at St Kilda vwhile Lyon is coach. If Stanley was at Geelong he would be approaching his 50th game by now. Lyon must tell Stanley that his career is on the line and he is giving him the rest of the season to prove himself.


User avatar
Junction Oval
SS Life Member
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
Been thanked: 19 times

Post: # 1096114Post Junction Oval »

St Nick said :
It will be very difficult for them to make it at St Kilda vwhile Lyon is coach. If Stanley was at Geelong he would be approaching his 50th game by now. Lyon must tell Stanley that his career is on the line and he is giving him the rest of the season to prove himself.
I tend to agree with you St Nick. Stanley was recruited for his speed and height - looked like good recruiting. However, he has played poorly at Sandy and not warranted further selection. We have no back-up for McEvoy, Blake & Kosi are out, so give Rhyse his opportuniy - 4 consecutive games or so and see how he goes (and don't expect miracles either).


User avatar
Junction Oval
SS Life Member
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
Been thanked: 19 times

Post: # 1096118Post Junction Oval »

oops - I forgot about Stanley's "hamstring injury."


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Post: # 1096205Post gringo »

Why give Stanley game time? He stuffed up preseason and hasn't looked like he is doing anything to change his situation. I would hope he will push for selection, until then give guys like Johnson a go who are tearing down the door trying to get a game.


User avatar
WinnersOnly
SS Life Member
Posts: 3059
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 10:24pm
Location: Canberra

Go after Mitch BROWN from Geelong...

Post: # 1096282Post WinnersOnly »

Go after Mitch BROWN from Geelong...they cant hang on to all of there tall forwards and he is going to be a beauty !


SAINTS another day older another day closer to the Holy Grail!
plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Re: Go after Mitch BROWN from Geelong...

Post: # 1096382Post plugger66 »

WinnersOnly wrote:Go after Mitch BROWN from Geelong...they cant hang on to all of there tall forwards and he is going to be a beauty !
So they are going to get rid of their beauty. Dont that unless he isnt as good as you think.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Post: # 1096525Post skeptic »

we do have a worrying trend of delisting players without really knowing whether or not they're good enough.

Geelong is a good model... name 1 ex-cat out there blitzing it up for their new club.

When they cut a player, they know damn well that he's not up to it.

Moloney doesn't count as he was a forced trade due to SC pressures and is still pbly the least best when compared to the midfielders they chose to keep instead

when we cut players their is still a lot of debate amongst supporters wheter or not they r good enough


plugger66
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 50626
Joined: Mon 26 Feb 2007 8:15pm
Location: oakleigh

Post: # 1096526Post plugger66 »

skeptic wrote:we do have a worrying trend of delisting players without really knowing whether or not they're good enough.

Geelong is a good model... name 1 ex-cat out there blitzing it up for their new club.

When they cut a player, they know damn well that he's not up to it.

Moloney doesn't count as he was a forced trade due to SC pressures and is still pbly the least best when compared to the midfielders they chose to keep instead

when we cut players their is still a lot of debate amongst supporters wheter or not they r good enough
Who are all these delisted players you speak of? Guerra and who else?


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Post: # 1096527Post dragit »

skeptic wrote:we do have a worrying trend of delisting players without really knowing whether or not they're good enough.

Geelong is a good model... name 1 ex-cat out there blitzing it up for their new club.

When they cut a player, they know damn well that he's not up to it.

Moloney doesn't count as he was a forced trade due to SC pressures and is still pbly the least best when compared to the midfielders they chose to keep instead

when we cut players their is still a lot of debate amongst supporters wheter or not they r good enough
On the other hand, name one ex-saint (who we cut) that is blitzing it somewhere else?
In fact name any players that were actually cut, who are now above average, it's so rare, all clubs hold onto any half-decent players if they can…
Roden, Bradley, Ray, Mattner, R Shaw, - clutching at straws really, I can't think of any guns…?


User avatar
#1GILL
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 1:15pm
Location: Berwick

Post: # 1096528Post #1GILL »

skeptic wrote:
Geelong is a good model... name 1 ex-cat out there blitzing it up for their new club.

Shane Mumford.


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Post: # 1096530Post dragit »

#1GILL wrote:
skeptic wrote:
Geelong is a good model... name 1 ex-cat out there blitzing it up for their new club.

Shane Mumford.
They didn't let him go, he left for more money.


User avatar
#1GILL
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 1:15pm
Location: Berwick

Post: # 1096531Post #1GILL »

dragit wrote:
#1GILL wrote:
skeptic wrote:
Geelong is a good model... name 1 ex-cat out there blitzing it up for their new club.

Shane Mumford.
They didn't let him go, he left for more money.
Wasn't that the point, that they can't hold on to all their talent?


User avatar
dragit
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13047
Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
Has thanked: 605 times
Been thanked: 315 times

Post: # 1096533Post dragit »

#1GILL wrote:
dragit wrote:
#1GILL wrote:
skeptic wrote: Geelong is a good model... name 1 ex-cat out there blitzing it up for their new club.
Shane Mumford.
They didn't let him go, he left for more money.
Wasn't that the point, that they can't hold on to all their talent?
I thought we were talking about delisting players that hadn't had a chance to prove themselves, I think Cats were pretty keen to keep Mumford.
Either way, I don't reckon any clubs get rid of any players that are half-decent, unless they have off-field or attitude problems…


User avatar
#1GILL
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2310
Joined: Sun 28 Sep 2008 1:15pm
Location: Berwick

Post: # 1096537Post #1GILL »

dragit wrote:
#1GILL wrote:
dragit wrote:
#1GILL wrote:
skeptic wrote: Geelong is a good model... name 1 ex-cat out there blitzing it up for their new club.
Shane Mumford.
They didn't let him go, he left for more money.
Wasn't that the point, that they can't hold on to all their talent?
I thought we were talking about delisting players that hadn't had a chance to prove themselves, I think Cats were pretty keen to keep Mumford.
Either way, I don't reckon any clubs get rid of any players that are half-decent, unless they have off-field or attitude problems…
Sorry I got confused with WinnersOnly's post about not being to hang on to Mitch Brown. Yes they definitely wanted to hang on to Mumford but Sydney offered him a million dollars and a 4 year contract, no player in Mumford's position would have turned that down.


User avatar
skeptic
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 16621
Joined: Wed 10 Mar 2004 7:10pm
Has thanked: 3492 times
Been thanked: 2762 times

Post: # 1096630Post skeptic »

I'll give this a go

At the moment we have Will Johnson, Rhy Stanley and Paul Cahill all seeimingly on the verge of being cut.
We've been playing an out of form Kosi and not really tried anyone else as forward (mind you we've not cut any of them yet but still) Johnson in particular has the hallmark of a player thatwe will cut b4 giving him a chance

Matty Ferguson spent years on our list and barely played after his 2nd year, showed a lot of potential in his last season taking 5 cont marks vs Melb (missed all his set shots though)
Gone but never played enough kids for us to see what he had

Alan Murray and Mark McGough didn't really get many chances

Barry Brooks played stuff all games despite having a good lastseason in the reserves

Luke Miles showed something andhad potential

Adam Pattison looked ok in his 2 games

Heck even Armitage was seemingly on the verge of being cut having barely gotten a game over 5 years.

I'm not saying that that list is full of champions but the majority of these guys didn't get many chances despite our club lacklustre players infront of them at teams and having lean patches of form too


User avatar
evertonfc
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7261
Joined: Mon 08 Mar 2004 9:11pm
Location: 'Quietly Confident' County
Has thanked: 115 times
Been thanked: 267 times
Contact:

Post: # 1096634Post evertonfc »

skeptic wrote: Matty Ferguson

Alan Murray and Mark McGough

Barry Brooks

Luke Miles

Adam Pattison
*shudder*

Ferguson was cut prematurely and very unlucky with injury. He genuinely was coming good. The rest were nowhere near it.


Clueless and mediocre petty tyrant.

Image
saint58
Club Player
Posts: 261
Joined: Fri 09 Oct 2009 10:10pm
Been thanked: 3 times

Post: # 1096641Post saint58 »

SainterK wrote:It depends on the trend of the game Con, big bodied forwards are the in form ones at the moment.

Cloke, Petrie, Kennedy...

Perhaps the game will evolve back to suiting the slight more athletic forward soon, but until then, they will struggle to make an impact IMO.
Archer 193 cm 99kg big bodied
Walsh 195 cm 97 kg big bodied
Johnson 191 cm 91 kg big bodied
Stanley 202 cm 95 kg is getting there
Cahill 192 cm 87 kg needs to get bigger.

So we do have at least 3 big bodied young key forwards (if they ever get there chance) in the club.

They are all playing well at sandy but ross has droped his youth policy now so maybe next season we will see these guys.


User avatar
Junction Oval
SS Life Member
Posts: 2867
Joined: Tue 30 Nov 2010 11:16am
Been thanked: 19 times

Post: # 1096643Post Junction Oval »

For those we recruit, the Football Dep't must think that they have reasonable prospects of playing AFL, or do we just recruit duds (no comedy required) ?

In our current situation, we need to bite the bullet and play them - there are 10 matches to go. The young guys will be taking the place of "bottom 6" players, so it will not destroy our competitvenss. By doing this we can go into the trade/draft period, with a good handle on who we should be keeping.


Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6531
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1207 times
Been thanked: 447 times

Post: # 1096655Post Jacks Back »

Will Johnson should come in this week and play predominately full forward (of course with the obligatory swapping around with Roo and Benny Mac) as RL seems to like doing.

Will didn't get a chance to play FF in his only game because, from memory, Roo was virtually playing there the first quarter before Will was concussed.

Let's have a look at him for 3 to 4 games Ross. PLEASE!

I'd also like to see Siposs come in as I think he may really be something but imo he may not be ready yet for the rough and tumble but a few more games in a row this season in the seniors would be good.

I'M EXCITED!! :D


gringo
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 12421
Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
Location: St Kilda
Has thanked: 296 times
Been thanked: 55 times

Post: # 1096662Post gringo »

Prismal, Mololney, Kingy, That tool that was captain and went to north, carlton got a guy this year that I forget his name also. they also lost a first rounder to the dogs in Djerkura. Geelong isn't any different, just lucky that some speculative talent worked.


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 1096682Post Bernard Shakey »

skeptic wrote:I'll give this a go

At the moment we have Will Johnson, Rhy Stanley and Paul Cahill all seeimingly on the verge of being cut.
We've been playing an out of form Kosi and not really tried anyone else as forward (mind you we've not cut any of them yet but still) Johnson in particular has the hallmark of a player thatwe will cut b4 giving him a chance

Matty Ferguson spent years on our list and barely played after his 2nd year, showed a lot of potential in his last season taking 5 cont marks vs Melb (missed all his set shots though)
Gone but never played enough kids for us to see what he had

Alan Murray and Mark McGough didn't really get many chances

Barry Brooks played stuff all games despite having a good lastseason in the reserves

Luke Miles showed something andhad potential

Adam Pattison looked ok in his 2 games

Heck even Armitage was seemingly on the verge of being cut having barely gotten a game over 5 years.

I'm not saying that that list is full of champions but the majority of these guys didn't get many chances despite our club lacklustre players infront of them at teams and having lean patches of form too
Where are they now?


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
Post Reply