Congratulations Geary for the quick turn around and getting back to the side! I think his kicking isn't depolorable. Better kick then Armitage, Polo and Gram and they are all still in the team.
I think this means a more defensive role for Fisher which will be no worries as he can do it, but we will miss his brilliant positioning as loose man if he does go down that road.
Team - Geary for Gwilt
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
-
prwilkinson
- SS Hall of Fame
- Posts: 1999
- Joined: Tue 21 Sep 2010 12:17pm
- Has thanked: 65 times
- Been thanked: 132 times
I would like to see Raph sitting on stiffy. I reckon he could hurt him.prwilkinson wrote:Will he play on Stiffy Johncock and try and hurt them the other way perhaps??
I wish Lynchy was playing... dunno why... just think the team is better with him in it... and Walshy.... so close now.... hope he gets to play against the Gold Coast.
-
SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18649
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1544 times
- Been thanked: 1901 times
Lynchy a bit stiff.Sam23 wrote:Congratulations Geary for the quick turn around and getting back to the side! I think his kicking isn't depolorable. Better kick then Armitage, Polo and Gram and they are all still in the team.
I think this means a more defensive role for Fisher which will be no worries as he can do it, but we will miss his brilliant positioning as loose man if he does go down that road.
Will stiffy play or is he a bit stiff and sore?
Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
-
SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18649
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1544 times
- Been thanked: 1901 times
-
SaintPav
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 18649
- Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
- Location: Alma Road
- Has thanked: 1544 times
- Been thanked: 1901 times
-
To the top
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
I would only have one of Jones and Geary in the side.
And Jones is so far in front of Geary that it does not matter.
Much has been written about Armitage, who is 22, 183cm and 84kg - so the only difference to Geary is 2kg.
Compare the way they use their bodies - and Jones does as well.
Given Geary can not do what Jones and Armitage can you look for other attributes.
And Geary is a hack there too, giving no pace therefore no spread and run ability plus he is a very, very ordinary disposer of the ball.
Our defence is well covered with the likes of Gilbert, Clarke, Dempster Gram, Ray and Goddard supporting Fisher and Dawson in the key positions.
So where does Geary fit in?
He will not feature in our mid rotations - Dal Santo, Montagna, Steven, Jones, Goddard, Gram, Ray, Armitage, Schnieder are all in front of him.
Lynch at least has versatility over Geary - being able to play forward and back.
And Jones is so far in front of Geary that it does not matter.
Much has been written about Armitage, who is 22, 183cm and 84kg - so the only difference to Geary is 2kg.
Compare the way they use their bodies - and Jones does as well.
Given Geary can not do what Jones and Armitage can you look for other attributes.
And Geary is a hack there too, giving no pace therefore no spread and run ability plus he is a very, very ordinary disposer of the ball.
Our defence is well covered with the likes of Gilbert, Clarke, Dempster Gram, Ray and Goddard supporting Fisher and Dawson in the key positions.
So where does Geary fit in?
He will not feature in our mid rotations - Dal Santo, Montagna, Steven, Jones, Goddard, Gram, Ray, Armitage, Schnieder are all in front of him.
Lynch at least has versatility over Geary - being able to play forward and back.
-
To the top
- SS Life Member
- Posts: 3266
- Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
- Been thanked: 390 times
-
Zac Attack
- Club Player
- Posts: 300
- Joined: Tue 05 Jul 2011 11:56pm
Well he is getting a game ahead of both players in a team that needs to keep on winning to get into the 8 so I somehow think that Geary is rated ahead of Lynch and Walsh.Ralphy wrote:Well ahead... dont see him on stkildas list next year unless contracted.saint6709 wrote:Walsh and Lynch well ahead of Geary in my book
-
Teflon
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 23139
- Joined: Sat 13 Mar 2004 11:44pm
- Has thanked: 728 times
- Been thanked: 1761 times
-
Wrote for Luck
- Club Player
- Posts: 1519
- Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
- Been thanked: 1 time
I agree Geary seems a good sub type.
But run out of defence - Walsh gives you that.
Good kicking in defence - Lynch.
Good man on man in defence - Simpkin.
Maybe based on match ups, but we're not attempting to replace Gwilt so to speak with this. I'm slightly intrigued.
But run out of defence - Walsh gives you that.
Good kicking in defence - Lynch.
Good man on man in defence - Simpkin.
Maybe based on match ups, but we're not attempting to replace Gwilt so to speak with this. I'm slightly intrigued.
Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
-
gringo
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 12421
- Joined: Tue 24 Mar 2009 11:05pm
- Location: St Kilda
- Has thanked: 296 times
- Been thanked: 55 times
Geary is handy as a sub because he is your Sean Dempster style utility, jack of all trades master of none (yet). Ross likes a sub that can be a fill in for injury from history Geary can have a run in the midfield and also tag damaging players or slot in on a forward or back wing. I think people have forgotten that he has played some pretty good games and his best is still in front of him. I'm happy to watch him get another crack. Lynch and Walsh should both be long term players but they are both inexperienced and it is a big game against unpredictable opponents.
-
matrix
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 21475
- Joined: Mon 21 May 2007 1:55pm
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
they are saying he will playSaintPav wrote:Lynchy a bit stiff.Sam23 wrote:Congratulations Geary for the quick turn around and getting back to the side! I think his kicking isn't depolorable. Better kick then Armitage, Polo and Gram and they are all still in the team.
I think this means a more defensive role for Fisher which will be no worries as he can do it, but we will miss his brilliant positioning as loose man if he does go down that road.
Will stiffy play or is he a bit stiff and sore?
recouped rather well form the knock apparently
but could be all bluff
-
mr six o'clock
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 4286
- Joined: Fri 17 Nov 2006 1:05am
- Has thanked: 46 times
- Been thanked: 236 times
-
dragit
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 13047
- Joined: Tue 29 Jun 2010 11:56am
- Has thanked: 605 times
- Been thanked: 315 times
It's fair to say your case amounts to a steaming turd,To the top wrote:I would only have one of Jones and Geary in the side.
And Jones is so far in front of Geary that it does not matter.
Much has been written about Armitage, who is 22, 183cm and 84kg - so the only difference to Geary is 2kg.
Compare the way they use their bodies - and Jones does as well.
Given Geary can not do what Jones and Armitage can you look for other attributes.
And Geary is a hack there too, giving no pace therefore no spread and run ability plus he is a very, very ordinary disposer of the ball.
Our defence is well covered with the likes of Gilbert, Clarke, Dempster Gram, Ray and Goddard supporting Fisher and Dawson in the key positions.
So where does Geary fit in?
He will not feature in our mid rotations - Dal Santo, Montagna, Steven, Jones, Goddard, Gram, Ray, Armitage, Schnieder are all in front of him.
Lynch at least has versatility over Geary - being able to play forward and back.
How much of Geary have you seen in the last 12 months?
.
It's not that difficult to work out really, we lose a rebounding defender for the year, neither of your mentioned players - Jones and Armitage are even remotely suited to that role, Geary is.
Did Gwilt feature in our mid rotations?, fair dinkim…
