Zac-Pelchen ?? !!

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Zed
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2174
Joined: Sun 28 Mar 2004 1:59pm
Location: by the seaside..
Has thanked: 35 times
Been thanked: 181 times

Post: # 1149047Post Zed »

gringo wrote:I would rate Zac Dawson in the top 6 full backs in the league. He has his bad days but that is the nature of his role. He isn't Scarlet or glass but he is our best option in a difficult position. Hawthorn would have loved to get him back I would think.
I would rate him in the top 17 fullbacks in the league


Life is never more fun than when you're the underdog competing against the giants.
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 1149048Post Bernard Shakey »

gringo wrote:I would rate Zac Dawson in the top 6 full backs in the league. He has his bad days but that is the nature of his role. He isn't Scarlet or glass but he is our best option in a difficult position. Hawthorn would have loved to get him back I would think.
What you are really saying is that there are only five full backs in the league.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 1149050Post Bernard Shakey »

saint6 wrote:I think that Zac is a highly underrated player. Just who would you suggest replace him in the back line?
My 16 year old nephew.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 36 times

Post: # 1149057Post lefty »

degruch wrote:
lefty wrote:His skills are terrible, every time he has to kick the ball you hope the kick will hit.
Massive disposal efficiency...are you sure you're talking about the right guy?

Yes im sure, I've seen it, bit of pressure and hes gone.
The only kicks he is ok at are the little short 25m ones.

Everytime he gets it, you cringe.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1149067Post degruch »

lefty wrote:
degruch wrote:
lefty wrote:His skills are terrible, every time he has to kick the ball you hope the kick will hit.
Massive disposal efficiency...are you sure you're talking about the right guy?

Yes im sure, I've seen it, bit of pressure and hes gone.
The only kicks he is ok at are the little short 25m ones.

Everytime he gets it, you cringe.
Everytime he gets it YOU cringe, the rest of us are probably fine...except Bernardo...but he's senile.


lefty
Club Player
Posts: 1297
Joined: Tue 28 Sep 2004 8:11pm
Been thanked: 36 times

Post: # 1149079Post lefty »

degruch wrote: Everytime he gets it YOU cringe, the rest of us are probably fine...except Bernardo...but he's senile.
Yea, ok please.

The sun doesn't shine through my rear. There are far better FB's in the league than Dawson who can kick.

When its a 1 on 1, he gets demolished. He's just lucky Fisher and Blake and the boys in the backline help him out.

Cloke farkn destroyed him this year, short memories I guess... meh.

Another one that cant kick (but can play) is Gilbert but he gives the team some run/dash which generates play.


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1149087Post degruch »

lefty wrote:
degruch wrote: Everytime he gets it YOU cringe, the rest of us are probably fine...except Bernardo...but he's senile.
Yea, ok please.

The sun doesn't shine through my rear. There are far better FB's in the league than Dawson who can kick.

Another one that cant kick (but can play) is Gilbert.
You can put the boot into Gilbert's, Gram's and (sometimes) Fisher's disposal under pressure, but Zac is fine. The difference between Zac and the others generally, he has ONE role, he's a stopper...he's the last line of defence. So, when he does make a mistake, you notice...luckily he doesn't make them too often.


User avatar
savatage
SS Life Member
Posts: 3799
Joined: Sun 04 Apr 2004 3:43pm
Location: Hollywood

Post: # 1149092Post savatage »

Some players only go for "safe" kicks - so their disposal can be 100%. Those that take risks have a much lower efficiency rate - but could be higher skilled, this arguement proves nothing.

On the point of retaining or trading Zac....or most players on the list - honestly, that's what a list manager is paid to work out...if they can negotiate a great deal for Zac, then why not look at it?


User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 1149097Post Bernard Shakey »

degruch wrote:
lefty wrote:
degruch wrote: Everytime he gets it YOU cringe, the rest of us are probably fine...except Bernardo...but he's senile.
Yea, ok please.

The sun doesn't shine through my rear. There are far better FB's in the league than Dawson who can kick.

Another one that cant kick (but can play) is Gilbert.
You can put the boot into Gilbert's, Gram's and (sometimes) Fisher's disposal under pressure, but Zac is fine. The difference between Zac and the others generally, he has ONE role, he's a stopper...he's the last line of defence. So, when he does make a mistake, you notice...luckily he doesn't make them too often.
Amazing how much you miss watching games in Adelaide. If you actually watched the occasional game in person you'd see how bad Zac can be one on one, rather than just watching him kick in from full back.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1149103Post degruch »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
degruch wrote:
lefty wrote:
degruch wrote: Everytime he gets it YOU cringe, the rest of us are probably fine...except Bernardo...but he's senile.
Yea, ok please.

The sun doesn't shine through my rear. There are far better FB's in the league than Dawson who can kick.

Another one that cant kick (but can play) is Gilbert.
You can put the boot into Gilbert's, Gram's and (sometimes) Fisher's disposal under pressure, but Zac is fine. The difference between Zac and the others generally, he has ONE role, he's a stopper...he's the last line of defence. So, when he does make a mistake, you notice...luckily he doesn't make them too often.
Amazing how much you miss watching games in Adelaide. If you actually watched the occasional game in person you'd see how bad Zac can be one on one, rather than just watching him kick in from full back.
You have no idea, and you'll never have any idea. You're like the bozo's that sat behind me last game I attended, and rubbished Zac whilst he did a brilliant job...don't like his haircut, or whatever, anything to have a shot. Give up and stick with the VFL.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1149105Post SainterK »

I'd love to do a poll, I reckon the Zac haters are all 50+ :wink:


User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1149110Post degruch »

SainterK wrote:I'd love to do a poll, I reckon the Zac haters are all 50+ :wink:
The guys sitting behind me at the ground we 20-something...I just thought they were young and stupid, not having lived through watching Maxy develop, or know what a fullback does. 'Young' doesn't seem to have much to do with it.


User avatar
ShanghaiSaint
Club Player
Posts: 1911
Joined: Thu 24 Mar 2005 7:43pm

Post: # 1149122Post ShanghaiSaint »

saint6 wrote:I think that Zac is a highly underrated player. Just who would you suggest replace him in the back line?
kosi, a wilow tree, girl scout selling cookies ....... guy has never been the same since 09.


Fortius Quo Fidelius
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 1149133Post Bernard Shakey »

degruch wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
degruch wrote:
lefty wrote:
degruch wrote: Everytime he gets it YOU cringe, the rest of us are probably fine...except Bernardo...but he's senile.
Yea, ok please.

The sun doesn't shine through my rear. There are far better FB's in the league than Dawson who can kick.

Another one that cant kick (but can play) is Gilbert.
You can put the boot into Gilbert's, Gram's and (sometimes) Fisher's disposal under pressure, but Zac is fine. The difference between Zac and the others generally, he has ONE role, he's a stopper...he's the last line of defence. So, when he does make a mistake, you notice...luckily he doesn't make them too often.
Amazing how much you miss watching games in Adelaide. If you actually watched the occasional game in person you'd see how bad Zac can be one on one, rather than just watching him kick in from full back.
You have no idea, and you'll never have any idea. You're like the bozo's that sat behind me last game I attended, and rubbished Zac whilst he did a brilliant job...don't like his haircut, or whatever, anything to have a shot. Give up and stick with the VFL.
You're the one who has no idea. I never criticise Saints players during a game. When was this so called brilliant game by Zac? Was it in this decade?


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 1149136Post Bernard Shakey »

SainterK wrote:I'd love to do a poll, I reckon the Zac haters are all 50+ :wink:
Don't you get to talk to many young supporters? wink


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1149140Post degruch »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
degruch wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
degruch wrote:
lefty wrote:
degruch wrote: Everytime he gets it YOU cringe, the rest of us are probably fine...except Bernardo...but he's senile.
Yea, ok please.

The sun doesn't shine through my rear. There are far better FB's in the league than Dawson who can kick.

Another one that cant kick (but can play) is Gilbert.
You can put the boot into Gilbert's, Gram's and (sometimes) Fisher's disposal under pressure, but Zac is fine. The difference between Zac and the others generally, he has ONE role, he's a stopper...he's the last line of defence. So, when he does make a mistake, you notice...luckily he doesn't make them too often.
Amazing how much you miss watching games in Adelaide. If you actually watched the occasional game in person you'd see how bad Zac can be one on one, rather than just watching him kick in from full back.
You have no idea, and you'll never have any idea. You're like the bozo's that sat behind me last game I attended, and rubbished Zac whilst he did a brilliant job...don't like his haircut, or whatever, anything to have a shot. Give up and stick with the VFL.
You're the one who has no idea. I never criticise Saints players during a game. When was this so called brilliant game by Zac? Was it in this decade?
You wait until after, and come on here to compare them with your 16 year old nephew? Bravo, that's very noble of you.

Zac has literally saved games for us this year, sure he's not perfect 100% of the time, but you'd rather we use Fisher as a stopper and our defensive counter attacks come from out of our arse?


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Post: # 1149141Post SainterK »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:I'd love to do a poll, I reckon the Zac haters are all 50+ :wink:
Don't you get to talk to many young supporters? wink
Yeah, just seems the 'older' supporters like the big bulky full backs of old.


thejiggingsaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 9357
Joined: Wed 03 Aug 2005 10:01pm
Has thanked: 634 times
Been thanked: 473 times

Post: # 1149151Post thejiggingsaint »

I like Zac, but if we were to get a good offer would let him go in a heartbeat!


St Kilda forever 🔴⚪️⚫️ ( God help me)
User avatar
Bernard Shakey
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 11228
Joined: Sun 18 Mar 2007 11:22pm
Location: Down By The River 1989, 2003, 2009 & 2013
Has thanked: 117 times
Been thanked: 135 times

Post: # 1149152Post Bernard Shakey »

SainterK wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:I'd love to do a poll, I reckon the Zac haters are all 50+ :wink:
Don't you get to talk to many young supporters? wink
Yeah, just seems the 'older' supporters like the big bulky full backs of old.
What like Bob Murray? He was and still is as skinny as a rake.


Old enough to repaint, but young enough to sell
kalsaint
Club Player
Posts: 1941
Joined: Sat 24 Apr 2004 10:24pm
Location: Perth WA
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 19 times

Post: # 1149155Post kalsaint »

Con Gorozidis wrote:
bigcarl wrote:Good player and don't want to lose him.
+ 1. 196 cm defenders dont grow on trees.

you know zac was in the AFL top 5 for 1%ers.

So cant believe people still criticise this bloke. wed be farked without him.

but agree he has one weakness - he needs to hit the gym and get stronger and a bit more bulk in him. but that is something that he can work on.

keep him - get him in the gym and we will get 5 years and another 100 games out of him.

Well I for one would be glad to see him go. Yes he needs to build up his body to be competitive. Yes he's a tall but doesnt play like a tall. He doesnt get his fist to the ball enough in marking contests. He generally gets plenty of help from midfield players flooding back in support and this negates potential scoreboard pressure. No other team gets so much help flooding back, so his task should be easier than most other backmen.

He does some good desperation things at times but offsets this with falling over, losing his footing and aloowing his opponent to dish off to others who can score.

He can kick well but often looks to too relaxed when free and kicks poorly to space with loopy kicks that allows the opposition to close down the run out of defence. Doesnt do enough of the tall player work needed in my opinion so would not be a loss overall. However, as some said, earlier we do need a replacement (as we cant play without a full back).

If hes kept I would use him as another leading forward but I would rather see a replacement.


Midfield clearances and clear winners are needed to make an effective forward line.

You need to protect the ball handler to increase posession efficiency
User avatar
degruch
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8948
Joined: Mon 19 May 2008 4:29pm
Location: Croydonia
Has thanked: 146 times
Been thanked: 237 times

Post: # 1149156Post degruch »

Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:
Bernard Shakey wrote:
SainterK wrote:I'd love to do a poll, I reckon the Zac haters are all 50+ :wink:
Don't you get to talk to many young supporters? wink
Yeah, just seems the 'older' supporters like the big bulky full backs of old.
What like Bob Murray? He was and still is as skinny as a rake.
Arrrrr, but he was as tough as leather, chewed nails for breakfast and could spit in the eye of a fly from 40 cubits away, by gum. Not like these namby pamby slipper wearin' lady-boys that play down back these days...ccccchhhhhht, p-ting!


Scollop
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10951
Joined: Sun 11 Sep 2011 2:26pm
Has thanked: 3380 times
Been thanked: 2350 times

Post: # 1149168Post Scollop »

He doesn't break the lines often enough or get the clearance often enough if there's a stoppage in the last line. He handballs to people that are stationary and only a metre away from him, instead of looking up for other options. He doesn't contribute enough by hand or by foot.

When Lyon played him forward he seemed to be a better forward option for us than a permanent fullback, but it made me think if he was going to be a forward he really shouldn't be in our best 22 if that's the case. it was just a temporary fix to our deficient forward line and lack of planning and lack of attacking strategies.

Having SOS at the club gave us confidence that he was being mentored by the fb of the century. I don't think he has taken the next step. If he commits to Pelchen and the club that he will improve his fitness and his upperbody strength at the same time then he is an asset. If he doesn't have enough brains to work it out then he is a liability.


User avatar
Iceman234
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6533
Joined: Wed 20 Jul 2005 1:29am

Post: # 1149177Post Iceman234 »

Hilarious.

Zac should be a very required player unless we are going to replace him with Bernard Shakey.

Bahahahaha.

You clown sheep todgers etc etc really have no clue.

Get a clue.

Can someone tell me any stats on how many goals Zac actually had kicked on him this year and how he went with pressure acts in the backline?


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Post: # 1149194Post Con Gorozidis »

Any other coach in the comp would have thrown zac fwd on more occassions depending on match ups and injuries etc. but lyon, being the worlds most conservative coach could just never quite stomach it. Was a bit radical for poor old ross.


ando051
Club Player
Posts: 291
Joined: Sun 30 May 2010 10:59am
Location: Melbourne

Post: # 1149227Post ando051 »

Armoooo wrote:Would be very disappointed if we lost Zac.

He is a very good stopper.
Agree with that comment, the only problem with Zac is that's all he does Stop. He needs to get more strings in his bow like the current good fullbacks, Scarlett, Tarrant, Gibson. These players also stop but they also use the ball and take on the game. It might of been the way Ross wanted him to play his game. Time will tell.


Post Reply