Cairnsman wrote: Ok tough internet man. I don't think it is a secret that I think BJ has not give value for money over the last 2 years. There's one tough guy.
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_surprised.gif)
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Cairnsman wrote: Ok tough internet man. I don't think it is a secret that I think BJ has not give value for money over the last 2 years. There's one tough guy.
you have the ability to be a politician but you've never had the ability to be an AFL footballer so I suggest you keep it to slagging Gillard as you're not up to slagging KosiThe Fireman wrote:Hmmmm..let me think..no I haven't played one...i haven't been a politician...I haven't been a astronaut..etc etc. so yeah I see your point.. I can't comment on much at all. Thanks for your censorship ...unreal.magnifisaint wrote:You guys are all a bunch of tools.
I wonder how many AFL games you've all played?
oh yeah...I'm a tool. mirror time?
Was, not now.Cairnsman wrote:Apparently or fact?plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:Kosi may not have lived up to his draft selection but I reckon he's given more value for money when you compare him against a couple of his other much higher paid teammates.
Got any names? He is apparently in our top 5 for payment. Cant think of others above who have given less.
That's what I thought that's why I called P66 on it. Clearly he should be embarrassed for being a bit chesty because as we know he can't back that type of talk up.SainterK wrote:Was, not now.Cairnsman wrote:Apparently or fact?plugger66 wrote:
Got any names? He is apparently in our top 5 for payment. Cant think of others above who have given less.
Quietly signed a heavily reduced contract end of 2010.
Don't know how many times people need to be told.
your posts are becoming even strangermagnifisaint wrote:you have the ability to be a politician but you've never had the ability to be an AFL footballer so I suggest you keep it to slagging Gillard as you're not up to slagging KosiThe Fireman wrote:Hmmmm..let me think..no I haven't played one...i haven't been a politician...I haven't been a astronaut..etc etc. so yeah I see your point.. I can't comment on much at all. Thanks for your censorship ...unreal.magnifisaint wrote:You guys are all a bunch of tools.
I wonder how many AFL games you've all played?
oh yeah...I'm a tool. mirror time?
Cairnsman wrote:Ok tough internet man. I don't think it is a secret that I think BJ has not give value for money over the last 2 years. There's one tough guy.plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:
No you made a comment that is possibly just as much bullshyte as mine. I've been led to believe that Kosi has take significant pay cuts to help the club out..."apparently" and is certainly not in the top 5..."apparently". So you name the top 5 and I'll tell you if you are correct or not.
You made the initial comment he gives more value than higher paid players. Forget what Kosi is on. That doesnt change your comment. Who are these higher paid players who give less valu than Kosi. Surely you are to gutless to give names.
SainterK wrote:Was, not now.Cairnsman wrote:Apparently or fact?plugger66 wrote:
Got any names? He is apparently in our top 5 for payment. Cant think of others above who have given less.
Quietly signed a heavily reduced contract end of 2010.
Don't know how many times people need to be told.
http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-pre ... 5923175064plugger66 wrote:
I dont think that is correct. Would love to see the article.
Koschitzke was handsomely rewarded with his previous three-year deal and it is understood he took a pay cut with his latest arrangement.
In the final year of his deal (2012), Koschitzke will be on the veteran's list meaning only half his wage will have to squeeze under the salary cap.
It is correct that's why I called you on your guess. I'm surprised you are not across it. Very surprising to say the least.plugger66 wrote:SainterK wrote:Was, not now.Cairnsman wrote:
Apparently or fact?
Quietly signed a heavily reduced contract end of 2010.
Don't know how many times people need to be told.
I dont think that is correct. Would love to see the article.
james rose wrote:http://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/afl-pre ... 5923175064plugger66 wrote:
I dont think that is correct. Would love to see the article.Koschitzke was handsomely rewarded with his previous three-year deal and it is understood he took a pay cut with his latest arrangement.
In the final year of his deal (2012), Koschitzke will be on the veteran's list meaning only half his wage will have to squeeze under the salary cap.
Cairnsman wrote:It is correct that's why I called you on your guess. I'm surprised you are not across it. Very surprising to say the least.plugger66 wrote:SainterK wrote:
Was, not now.
Quietly signed a heavily reduced contract end of 2010.
Don't know how many times people need to be told.
I dont think that is correct. Would love to see the article.
Ok well if you are going to guess then I will also and say that I reckon Kosi would be nowhere near 400k or even close to the top 5 earners at the club.plugger66 wrote:Cairnsman wrote:It is correct that's why I called you on your guess. I'm surprised you are not across it. Very surprising to say the least.plugger66 wrote:
I dont think that is correct. Would love to see the article.
Still say no on a higher wage has performed anywhere near as poorly as Kosi. Also say Kosi would have got close to 400K this year which still have in the top 5 in the club.