Learnt something last night. It is holding the ball if you change direction. This shall not take into account the fake the player was tackled straight away, the tackling player latching onto the arm with the ball. No prior and first holding the ball all night......
hmmmmm
Anyone with some good computer skills able to put the riewoldt holding the ball next to the cloke non holding the ball (wright is the tackler, swings him 360 and cloke drops the ball... which leads to pendles setting up the crim krak) Two of the most inconsistent decisions in history......
As geary said, embaressing.... waters needs to do something ASAP otherwise I wont bother watching anymore because we are 5 goals behind before the first bounce.
new holding the ball rule
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
new holding the ball rule
FQF
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
loyal in the good times and bad
In richo I trust
2013 trade/draft best ever?
Billings - future brownlow medallist Longer - future best ruck
Dunstan - future captain Eli - future cult hero
Acres - future norm smith
Re: new holding the ball rule
The Reiwoldt HTB was bizarre???
And he was pinged twice.....both times he had prior
And he was pinged twice.....both times he had prior
-
CURLY
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 9625
- Joined: Fri 16 Feb 2007 3:24pm
- Location: WARBURTON
- Has thanked: 135 times
- Been thanked: 1225 times
Re: new holding the ball rule
BigMart wrote:The Reiwoldt HTB was bizarre???
And he was pinged twice.....both times he had prior
Are you serious? Riewoldts was never holding the ball after Clokes was not payed.
NO IFS OR BUTS HARVS IS KING OF THE AFL
Re: new holding the ball rule
I'm with you curly. It is either both players holding the ball or play on. Umps need to be consistent, particularly when the result causes a potential 2 goal difference.
-
Munga
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5286
- Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 12:00am
- Has thanked: 525 times
- Been thanked: 98 times
Re: new holding the ball rule
Rooey wasn't HTB, no prior op. Tackled immediately. Seems there's a seperate rule for the Saints.
Gehrig emerged from scans yesterday saying he was "as sweet as a bun"
-
Greg T
- Club Player
- Posts: 664
- Joined: Sun 07 Apr 2013 4:12pm
- Location: Gold Coast
- Has thanked: 822 times
- Been thanked: 15 times
Re: new holding the ball rule
The cloke one where he clearly was caught the pendlebury got it was disgraceful.
Nick got pinged straight away with no prior.....
Nick got pinged straight away with no prior.....
100 goals in 14 games...Lockett is the key
-
Sainter_Dad
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 6167
- Joined: Thu 05 Jun 2008 1:04pm
- Has thanked: 250 times
- Been thanked: 1071 times
Re: new holding the ball rule
This ......Solar wrote: Anyone with some good computer skills able to put the riewoldt holding the ball next to the cloke non holding the ball (wright is the tackler, swings him 360 and cloke drops the ball... which leads to pendles setting up the crim krak) Two of the most inconsistent decisions in history......
Can someone put up a YouTube channel asking questions like this
Another one from last week was the run down and tackle from Anzac day - the Swans get a push in the back decision - later the exact scenario and it is HTB against the Saints.
Maybe this is the only way that 'consistency can be achieved.'
“Youth ages, immaturity is outgrown, ignorance can be educated, and drunkenness sobered, but stupid lasts forever.”
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!
― Aristophanes
If you have a Bee in your Bonnet - I can assist you with that - but it WILL involve some smacking upside the head!