St. Luke wrote:About time we got serious and invested in our very own VFL side, none of this affiliate stuff. Most other serious teams have done it, why not us?
But we dont have anywhere to play. That is the real problem.
Sandy V Cats
Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators
Re: Sandy V Cats
But we dont have anywhere to play. That is the real problem.
Re: Sandy V Cats
Correct..neither Moorabbin or LHC have the infrastructure to hold fortnightly gamesplugger66 wrote:St. Luke wrote:About time we got serious and invested in our very own VFL side, none of this affiliate stuff. Most other serious teams have done it, why not us?
But we dont have anywhere to play. That is the real problem.
Would cost a couple of mill to get Moorabbin back to that standard quite apart from the ongoing running costs of the team
Seriously want it to happen somehow though
THE BUBBLE HAS BURST
2011 player sponsor
-
St. Luke
- Saintsational Legend
- Posts: 5268
- Joined: Wed 17 Mar 2004 12:34pm
- Location: Hiding at Telstra Dome!
Re: Sandy V Cats
I know. You're rightsaintbrat wrote:St. Luke wrote:About time we got serious and invested in our very own VFL side, none of this affiliate stuff. Most other serious teams have done it, why not us?
$ $ $ $
when only 32,600 supporters sign on as members it gets tougher..
when saints 'issues' cause sponsors to steer clear ( amazes me still that Essendon have' gained' both during this tough period yet the saints issues are- Personal and Bombers issues are team/club/player )
Bit of a shame really. Still, I think Watters will develop competition for spots within the senior side. We've seen glimmers of hope with some new talent emerging. The game against the Cats showed what a lack of development has cost us and how much we'll be hurting for a number of seasons to come.
When they created LENNY HAYES (in the shadow of Harvs) they forgot to break the mold (again)- hence the Supremely Incredible Jack Steven!!