Team v GWS

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Post Reply
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8574
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1526 times

Team v GWS

Post: # 1608910Post kosifantutti »

StKilda v GWS Giants
Webster, Longer, Dunstan, Membrey in for Templeton.
Smith, Cameron, Haynes, Hopper in for Tomlinson.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8574
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1526 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1608911Post kosifantutti »

Interchange from
7 8 13 18 28 29 41


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
st.byron
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 10598
Joined: Tue 14 Jun 2005 7:04pm
Location: North
Has thanked: 1011 times
Been thanked: 1055 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1608912Post st.byron »

Reckon Dunstan, Webster are certainties. Minch should hold his spot. Lonie or Acres to be one in and one out. Membrey and Billy there as back-up.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1608917Post saintspremiers »

st.byron wrote:Reckon Dunstan, Webster are certainties. Minch should hold his spot. Lonie or Acres to be one in and one out. Membrey and Billy there as back-up.
Agree.

One of the kids will still be sore so very likely 2 changes


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30068
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1222 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1608921Post saintsRrising »

kosifantutti wrote:Interchange from
7 8 13 18 28 29 41
INTERCHANGE FROM
7 Luke Dunstan
8 Blake Acres
13 Jack Lonie
18 Billy Longer
28 Tim Membrey
29 Jimmy Webster
41 Darren Minchington


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1608988Post Bluthy »

I think if Dunstan and Webster pull up ok they will go in. Eli's out and maybe Sinclair or Acres to go out. I think you've got to back Hickey to get the job done on Mummy alone with his form. He's doing well in the ruck and can hurt Mummy around the ground.


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8574
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1526 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609016Post kosifantutti »

Dunstan and Webster for Eli and Blacres.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
fugazi
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4243
Joined: Thu 25 Mar 2004 2:47pm
Location: incarnate
Has thanked: 286 times
Been thanked: 694 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609018Post fugazi »

Stiff on Acres to go out...shows some special signs I reckon...needs a few weeks in there....Ross Dunstan and Armo bit slow together


Nee!
The_President
Club Player
Posts: 878
Joined: Sun 27 Mar 2016 8:05pm
Has thanked: 7 times
Been thanked: 94 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609020Post The_President »

Did Acres sleep with the wife/daughter/cousin?

Jesus he's stiff.
When is he contracted to?


User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7833
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 561 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609021Post magnifisaint »

The_President wrote:Did Acres sleep with the wife/daughter/cousin?

Jesus he's stiff.
When is he contracted to?
2018


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609024Post Bluthy »

Shame about the Blacres but someone had to give to get both Jimmy and Dunny back in. And we don't know if he is doing all the things they want him to do or not meeting a standard or they are worried about him being able to back up after a tough game. I'm just putting it down to the 'big guys take time' principal. As long as he keeps soaking in all the knowledge around him he'll be a ripper.


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4581
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 368 times
Been thanked: 450 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609056Post loris »

Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.


longtimesaint
Club Player
Posts: 1857
Joined: Thu 01 May 2008 6:30pm
Location: Mentone
Has thanked: 17 times
Been thanked: 263 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609058Post longtimesaint »

loris wrote:Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.
It had to be Acres or Minchington to make way and perhaps Minch showed a bit more.
The only other one who may have been tested was Lonie but has s bit of X factor round the goals.


One year will be our year
freely
SS Hall of Fame
Posts: 2041
Joined: Fri 07 Jun 2013 1:03pm
Has thanked: 214 times
Been thanked: 339 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609059Post freely »

Interesting to see that Lee held his spot. Reckon Webster has a bit of class - be nice to see him freed up on the wing.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609073Post saintspremiers »

freely wrote:Interesting to see that Lee held his spot. Reckon Webster has a bit of class - be nice to see him freed up on the wing.
Of course Lee held his spot. He played well and we need a key defender to fill the injury to Roberton. You can't put Spud Delaney in and Goddard appears not to be ready at this stage


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
Jacks Back
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6531
Joined: Sat 11 Jun 2011 4:52pm
Location: Here
Has thanked: 1207 times
Been thanked: 447 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609078Post Jacks Back »

longtimesaint wrote:
loris wrote:Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.
It had to be Acres or Minchington to make way and perhaps Minch showed a bit more.
The only other one who may have been tested was Lonie but has s bit of X factor round the goals.
Lonie and Sinclair having been setting the world on fire of late so it could have been one of those two to make way instead of 8cres.


As ex-president Peter Summers said:
“If we are going to be a contender, we may as well plan to win the bloody thing.”


St Kilda - At least we have a Crest!
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609080Post Bluthy »

loris wrote:Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.
That could be the standards thing Tony said he wasn't meeting. Sinclair got dropped for not chasing his man enough as well. Maybe Acres doesn't have the tank yet for full two way running in the incredibly fast AFL - he's a big unit. I think he is only playing 60-70% game time or something which indicates he might not be able to run out full games yet.


User avatar
Griggsy
SS Life Member
Posts: 2524
Joined: Mon 21 Jul 2008 1:41am
Location: WA

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609176Post Griggsy »

Bluthy wrote:
loris wrote:Blake doesn't chase opponents if the ball gets through the mid field. His defensive pressure needs plenty of work IMHO.
That could be the standards thing Tony said he wasn't meeting. Sinclair got dropped for not chasing his man enough as well. Maybe Acres doesn't have the tank yet for full two way running in the incredibly fast AFL - he's a big unit. I think he is only playing 60-70% game time or something which indicates he might not be able to run out full games yet.
From memory it was 58% game time last week I think. Numbers were impressive considering but I'm guessing he has issues keeping with the pace for 4 quarters which doesn't suit our current running style. He was involved around clearances I think but not sure if I saw him too much as part of those running chains moving forward.
still a reserve atleast so I doubt he's in the dog house.


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609673Post Con Gorozidis »

I am a bit confused about Webster this week and last. Why did he miss against the Hawks? Was he ill or injured? I can't recall.

Did he come back too soon? 7 disposals. Why play a sick or injured Webster and leave a healthy Acres in the sheds?


User avatar
Wayne42
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4911
Joined: Mon 24 Jun 2013 10:27pm
Has thanked: 619 times
Been thanked: 558 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609678Post Wayne42 »

Con Gorozidis wrote:I am a bit confused about Webster this week and last. Why did he miss against the Hawks? Was he ill or injured? I can't recall.

Did he come back too soon? 7 disposals. Why play a sick or injured Webster and leave a healthy Acres in the sheds?
Clearly they are having 2nd thoughts on Acres, and so they should.


The Saints are under review, will it make any difference to the underachievers ?
User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v GWS

Post: # 1609690Post Con Gorozidis »

Wayne42 wrote:
Con Gorozidis wrote:I am a bit confused about Webster this week and last. Why did he miss against the Hawks? Was he ill or injured? I can't recall.

Did he come back too soon? 7 disposals. Why play a sick or injured Webster and leave a healthy Acres in the sheds?
Clearly they are having 2nd thoughts on Acres, and so they should.
What do you mean by '2nd thoughts' and I am trying to get to the bottom of what (if anything) has ailed Jimmy the last fortnight?

Edit: looked this up. Webster had a sore calf or hamstring apparently?


Post Reply