Team v Eagles

This unofficial St Kilda Saints fan forum is for people of all ages to chat Saints Footy and all posts must be respectful.

Moderators: Saintsational Administrators, Saintsational Moderators

Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613503Post Bluthy »

Playon wrote:It seems that Richo puts as much stock into defenders as GT put into ruckmen.
We have Delaney, Goddard and Lee all not getting a game, we've already been undersized down back with Fisher and Dempster.

Either that or the plan is, OK were going to leak goals so lets hurt them the other way. I'm hoping it doesnt turn out to be a flood.
Still the last time I crapped on about team balance we won, so I'll keep my mouth shut and put faith in Richo's selections

I'm looking forward to the upset
I was bit irked by the lack of KPD's too. But my guess on this is that they want to see if Roberton can step up. He's up to 87 games now. He's had Dempster and Fisher behind him directing traffic virtually his whole time at the saints. Lets see if he can take more responsibly and do a number playing on a big forward. Can he take charge and be verbal organising the defence on the last line. He seems to read the play well and has good marking and pretty good kick. Maybe in a game that was always hard to win its a bit of an experiment and to give Robbo another challenge to keep him developing.


Playon
Club Player
Posts: 1959
Joined: Sun 16 Oct 2011 11:10am

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613507Post Playon »

Yeah I get all that but it makes me wonder if Spud or Max would of got a game under Richo. Is stopping a certain goal as important as kicking one?
It becomes an issue when we leak easy goals and go to all this effort to get it down the other end and fail to score only to have it sent back again etc

Dont get me wrong we've done well in defense at times and not so well in others, without Fisher there we may be struggling a bit too much.
As were in a development year I thought it might be handy to give Goddard a run, especially for his development

I get the game plan which is why I offered the Either comment. Still I feel were light on down back and we have options, all of 3 playing in the 2s

As far as Delaney goes, from what I've read he seems to of given up, which is a shame, really nice guy, was hoping he'd make it


Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4836
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 317 times
Been thanked: 451 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613508Post Moods »

Hope I'm wrong, but Roberton is barely AFLstandard imo. Too slow by foot as well as thinking. Also undersized. Has played better this year but I would prefer that Goddard was developed.


User avatar
Wrote for Luck
Club Player
Posts: 1519
Joined: Thu 07 Jan 2010 8:33am
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613513Post Wrote for Luck »

I really rate Roberton as a ball user who can at times be very damaging by foot. I'm not convinced he can take a big key forward but it will be interesting to see how he goes.

With Geary, Dempster and Joey back there we should, at least, still be organised enough. And the other blokes aren't babies:

Roberton is nearly 25.
Savage is 25.
Webster is nearly 23.
And Gilbert is 29.

They must have a lot of confidence that Roberton is tip top and ready to roll.


Pills 'n' Thrills and Heartaches
To the top
SS Life Member
Posts: 3266
Joined: Fri 16 Mar 2007 4:05pm
Been thanked: 390 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613516Post To the top »

The fact that both Fisher and Gilbert each missed nearly 2 seasons heading into last season cost the Club, as their form on resuming last season and again this season has confirmed.

Roberton was also blighted by injury the season before last after a promising first year after coming from the West.

Fisher will be sorely missed on Sunday - at 191cm he remains a premier defender.

The responsibility will firstly fall on Gilbert (194cm and a very good closing player with a good spoil and good run from defence), Roberton (194cm who to date has not shown he can play to his height in my view but can rebound) and Dempster (191cm who has not often played to his height acknowledging that he has taken some exceptional marks but not noted for rebound).

These 3 will have to play to their height in firstly effecting spoils in marking contests, bringing the ball to ground for (hopefully) the precision, running rebound of Montagna, Webster and Savage.

Geary will be handed a "lock down" task, probably on Le Cras who is dangerous at ground level and in the air.

Where the problem may be is with the third man up - where Webster at 188cm is the next tallest after Gilbert, Roberton and Dempster and would be under pressure as we saw last week when he was forced to that role.

Lee at 194cm is still being educated on defence, but has potential with his marking and disposal (noting that disposal out of defence is absolutely vital so he would join our others who are given the ball in the defensive arc - and the reason Montagna is back there now), Goddard remains a work in progress and you would expect that he will graduate to AFL ranks as the season progresses whilst Delaney, as exclusively a lock down defender on monster forwards has limited currency.

Then there is Carlisle sitting in the wings.

The fact is that even without Fisher, our defence has great experience with firstly Montagna, Dempster and Gilbert, then Geary all well past 100 games and then with Savage and Roberton closing on 100 games - then Webster.

So we would be looking at this experience to stand us in good stead - plus with defensive and pressure acts elsewhere disrupting delivery into their forward 50.

The possibility of Bruce going back is always an option - leaving a short and quick mobile attack on the expanses of that venue.

So run them off their legs!

The defensive instruction from me would be "You are the experience of this football Club, so show us you can perform to that status because that is the not negotiable requirement. And, if you can not you are on borrowed time because we will need to turn you over sooner rather than later".

Ruthless hey?

But that IS the competition.

And of that experience, Gilbert and Montagna are the only ones who have a "second string", able to play elsewhere and contribute effectively.


User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 766 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613517Post samuraisaint »

I think I'll let Gavin Mitchell have the last word.
Best game I never went to - watched it with the ferals from the old Animal Enclosure at Stewie Loewe's pub, Flaming Moe's in East Bentleigh.
Probably the greatest day in Dan Healy's life.
Last edited by samuraisaint on Fri 13 May 2016 9:30pm, edited 1 time in total.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
User avatar
MC Gusto
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 6033
Joined: Tue 09 Mar 2004 8:29am
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 364 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613518Post MC Gusto »

Personally think Roberton is v good player


#1 Ryder fan
User avatar
samuraisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 5814
Joined: Sun 25 Sep 2011 3:23pm
Location: M32
Has thanked: 816 times
Been thanked: 766 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613519Post samuraisaint »

MC Gusto wrote:Personally think Roberton is v good player
Agreed. Couldn't believe our luck when we got him after he left Freo. He's going to be a 200 game player for us.


Your friendly neighbourhood samurai.
BigMart
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 13622
Joined: Sat 22 Mar 2008 6:06pm
Been thanked: 1 time

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613520Post BigMart »

Shows you how much AR rates Lee

Roberton - not a key defenders A Hole is bought straight back in after 4 weeks out and no VFL walks past Lee


User avatar
kosifantutti
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8575
Joined: Fri 21 Jan 2005 9:06am
Location: Back in town
Has thanked: 525 times
Been thanked: 1527 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613525Post kosifantutti »

Moods wrote:Hope I'm wrong, but Roberton is barely AFLstandard imo. Too slow by foot as well as thinking. Also undersized. Has played better this year but I would prefer that Goddard was developed.
Lucky for you, you are wrong.

He was great last year as he was in 2013.


Macquarie Dictionary Word of the Year for 2023 "Kosi Lives"
Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4836
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 317 times
Been thanked: 451 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613533Post Moods »

kosifantutti wrote:
Moods wrote:Hope I'm wrong, but Roberton is barely AFLstandard imo. Too slow by foot as well as thinking. Also undersized. Has played better this year but I would prefer that Goddard was developed.
Lucky for you, you are wrong.

He was great last year as he was in 2013.
No he wasn't. His disposal and decision making is awful, and he's not fast. I'll be happy to be corrected Sunday night. Let's wait and see.


SainterK
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 21057
Joined: Thu 14 Aug 2008 9:53pm
Location: Melb

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613536Post SainterK »

BigMart wrote:Shows you how much AR rates Lee

Roberton - not a key defenders A Hole is bought straight back in after 4 weeks out and no VFL walks past Lee
Obsession with Lee amongst saints fans, don't really understand it


User avatar
Con Gorozidis
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 23532
Joined: Thu 19 Jun 2008 4:04pm
Has thanked: 100 times
Been thanked: 78 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613539Post Con Gorozidis »

This is what I think:

AR has already played his cards. He thinks we have a GF defence of Carlisle-Roberton-Webster-Goddard-?-?

This is kind of a self fulfilling prophecy because guys like Delaney and Lee already deep down KNOW they are not in the coach's plans. Therefore because their confidence is SMASHED the coach can point to this and say 'See I told you they were no good.'

The other two back spots are open - Savage, Newnes, Rice, White, DMac will fight for those two spots.

I used to think that Roberton (hard tackler, tall and good runner) was easily better than Lee but now I am not convinced. Yes Roberton is tougher and a better tackler - but Lee is clearly a better kick and these days I place a heavy weight on kicking. I now think Lee is maybe/possibly better than Roberton. So I think maybe the coach has made the wrong bet here.


saintspremiers
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 25303
Joined: Tue 01 Feb 2005 4:25pm
Location: Trump Tower
Has thanked: 142 times
Been thanked: 284 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613542Post saintspremiers »

SainterK wrote:
BigMart wrote:Shows you how much AR rates Lee

Roberton - not a key defenders A Hole is bought straight back in after 4 weeks out and no VFL walks past Lee
Obsession with Lee amongst saints fans, don't really understand it
I like Lee and he was shafted by AR even though Minch could play two very poor games and then get a third after finally being dropped.

Saying all that, Robbo was an automatic in. He has three kids and he's only 24. Forced to be way more mature than most blokes at 30


i am Melbourne Skies - sometimes Blue Skies, Grey Skies, even Partly Cloudy Skies.
User avatar
WellardSaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 8082
Joined: Sat 26 May 2012 11:25am
Location: Perth- the best weather in Oz, but the worst rednecks.
Has thanked: 1771 times
Been thanked: 822 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613543Post WellardSaint »

Waking up to rain in Perth


A real Sainter will pledge allegiance to the ❤🤍🖤 and despise the Pies, the Blues, and the Injectors.
Remember one of the 10 Commandments : Thou shalt have no other team before thee
User avatar
SaintPav
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 18655
Joined: Wed 16 Jun 2010 9:24pm
Location: Alma Road
Has thanked: 1544 times
Been thanked: 1901 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613544Post SaintPav »

Moods wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:
Moods wrote:Hope I'm wrong, but Roberton is barely AFLstandard imo. Too slow by foot as well as thinking. Also undersized. Has played better this year but I would prefer that Goddard was developed.
Lucky for you, you are wrong.

He was great last year as he was in 2013.
No he wasn't. His disposal and decision making is awful, and he's not fast. I'll be happy to be corrected Sunday night. Let's wait and see.
Kosi is right. He was


Holder of unacceptable views and other thought crimes.
Moods
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4836
Joined: Fri 05 Jun 2009 3:05pm
Has thanked: 317 times
Been thanked: 451 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613545Post Moods »

SaintPav wrote:
Moods wrote:
kosifantutti wrote:
Moods wrote:Hope I'm wrong, but Roberton is barely AFLstandard imo. Too slow by foot as well as thinking. Also undersized. Has played better this year but I would prefer that Goddard was developed.
Lucky for you, you are wrong.

He was great last year as he was in 2013.
No he wasn't. His disposal and decision making is awful, and he's not fast. I'll be happy to be corrected Sunday night. Let's wait and see.
Kosi is right. He was
All I know is that if players the likes of Roberton are the future at the club, we will continue to be meddling, middle ranked team.

I see it the same as Longer and Hickey. Hickey always had more class and had to be played if we were to improve. Longer was just a stop gap. Thankfully Hickey is starting to realise his potential. Improves the team immeasurably. Roberton is AFL standard, nothing more nothing less. He will do for now, but for the team to make strides the likes of Goddard need to step in the next 12-18mths.


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613546Post Bluthy »

WellardSaint wrote:Waking up to rain in Perth
Maybe Richo and co consulted the forecast and went with less talls because of the rain. Is there no end to their foresight?


Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613548Post Bluthy »

Con Gorozidis wrote:This is what I think:

AR has already played his cards. He thinks we have a GF defence of Carlisle-Roberton-Webster-Goddard-?-?

This is kind of a self fulfilling prophecy because guys like Delaney and Lee already deep down KNOW they are not in the coach's plans. Therefore because their confidence is SMASHED the coach can point to this and say 'See I told you they were no good.'

The other two back spots are open - Savage, Newnes, Rice, White, DMac will fight for those two spots.

I used to think that Roberton (hard tackler, tall and good runner) was easily better than Lee but now I am not convinced. Yes Roberton is tougher and a better tackler - but Lee is clearly a better kick and these days I place a heavy weight on kicking. I now think Lee is maybe/possibly better than Roberton. So I think maybe the coach has made the wrong bet here.
Just like Hickey/Longer there is a long way to go with our backs. At the moment Richo is putting a high value on setting standards - hence Tony's list of players that will be picked each week. Robbo with close to 100 AFL games is probably a good standard setter. And this week is definitely a chance to see if he can take more responsibility on his shoulders.

Whether Robbo can develop a strong body to be that 3rd tall back is a question. Sometimes guys put on more weight after 25. From memory Dempster wasn't as solid as he is now until his later 20's. And someone like Dawson was never huge but developed muscles.


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613553Post saintsRrising »

Long term it is not Robo vs Goddard (or Carlisle).

Goddard is being groomed as a key defender. Robbo will be on the flank.

However right here and now Goddard is being developed and is deemed no quite ready for a regular spot. If his tank is suspect then at the very long WACA he would struggle.

In addition it will probably be good for Robbos development that he have some big tasks. I mean if we are say ina big final and Goddard or Carlisle go down with injury (or even if they are just havinga bad day and the coach needs to try someone else on their opponent) do you want Robbo then learning how to cover a big forward?


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
Bluthy
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4068
Joined: Wed 29 May 2013 8:05pm

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613662Post Bluthy »

saintsRrising wrote:Long term it is not Robo vs Goddard (or Carlisle).

Goddard is being groomed as a key defender. Robbo will be on the flank.

However right here and now Goddard is being developed and is deemed no quite ready for a regular spot. If his tank is suspect then at the very long WACA he would struggle.

In addition it will probably be good for Robbos development that he have some big tasks. I mean if we are say ina big final and Goddard or Carlisle go down with injury (or even if they are just havinga bad day and the coach needs to try someone else on their opponent) do you want Robbo then learning how to cover a big forward?
as

Players can suprise you as they develop and get experience and bigger bodies. Who saw Dempster becoming a key back? My issue with Robbo is I don't know if he's got that consistently good kicking to be a a really damaging rebounding back. But his run might be really valuable if he is playing as that third tall - could be that Gibson type that peels off his man straight away to go to the contest and run it out to launch attacks. That then lets us fit one more of Savage, Webster, White, Rice and McKenzie in the team as we have a plethora of these guys and its going to be a struggle to fit them all in.

Lee would be a bit more the traditional third tall - a bit bigger and slower but with great marking and kicking. Its great to have options and see who develops. Two yeas ago we didn't seem to have anyone to replace Demps and Fish.


loris
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 4581
Joined: Tue 22 Jan 2008 5:41pm
Has thanked: 369 times
Been thanked: 450 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613665Post loris »

saintsRrising wrote:
However right here and now Goddard is being developed and is deemed no quite ready for a regular spot. If his tank is suspect then at the very long WACA he would struggle.

Cricket season is over sRS, footy hasn't been played at the WACA since last century!!! :wink: :wink: :wink:

AFL is played at Subiaco Ground - which has very WIDE wings.

Couple more years and footy will be played closer to the WACA, the currently being built stadium at Burswood.

It's oval size will be exactly the same size as the MCG....... just a bit of trivia for you :wink: :wink: :wink:


User avatar
saintsRrising
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 30069
Joined: Mon 15 Mar 2004 11:07am
Location: Melbourne
Has thanked: 707 times
Been thanked: 1223 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613671Post saintsRrising »

loris wrote:
saintsRrising wrote:
However right here and now Goddard is being developed and is deemed no quite ready for a regular spot. If his tank is suspect then at the very long WACA he would struggle.

Cricket season is over sRS, footy hasn't been played at the WACA since last century!!! :wink: :wink: :wink:

AFL is played at Subiaco Ground - which has very WIDE wings.

Couple more years and footy will be played closer to the WACA, the currently being built stadium at Burswood.

It's oval size will be exactly the same size as the MCG....... just a bit of trivia for you :wink: :wink: :wink:

My bad on the name :oops: ...as I was thinking Subie but wrote WACA.

Subiaco: 175.6 metres x 122.4 metres

MCG: 160 metres x 141 metres

So Subi is longer (hence my comment) than the G or Docklands 159.5 metres x 128.8 metres


Flying the World in comfort thanks to FF Points....
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7838
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 564 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613679Post magnifisaint »

BigMart wrote:Shows you how much AR rates Lee

Roberton - not a key defenders A Hole is bought straight back in after 4 weeks out and no VFL walks past Lee
geez you are full of it. What do you know that others don't.

Roberton is a good defender


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
User avatar
magnifisaint
Saintsational Legend
Posts: 7838
Joined: Sun 02 May 2004 2:52am
Has thanked: 209 times
Been thanked: 564 times

Re: Team v Eagles

Post: # 1613680Post magnifisaint »

Bluthy wrote:
WellardSaint wrote:Waking up to rain in Perth
Maybe Richo and co consulted the forecast and went with less talls because of the rain. Is there no end to their foresight?
Aint raining no. Will be a fast track. Saints have been moving the ball well. Subi should suit their game plan.


Posting 20 years of holey crap!
Post Reply